Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085863C070212
Original file (2003085863C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


                  IN THE CASE OF:
        


                  BOARD DATE: 9 October 2003
                  DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003085863

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. Chairperson
Mr. Robert J. Osborn, II Member
Ms. Eloise C. Prendergast Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that her records be corrected to validate her 21 June 1999 reenlistment in the US Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Individual Mobilization Augmentee). She also requests orders be published to assign her from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to a troop program unit.

APPLICANT STATES: That since she had a current physical examination, taken on 14 June 1995, she was fully eligible to reenlist on 21 June 1999. She was given the oath of reenlistment, taken to her unit and introduced to the members of that unit. However, she never received orders assigning her to that unit. Her recruiter told her to be patient, that orders would be forthcoming. However, those orders never materialized.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

She enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years in pay grade E-1 on 16 October 1961. She was honorably released from active duty on 25 February 1964.

She had a break in service until her enlistment in the USAR for 1 year in pay grade E-4 on 9 November 1973. She was honorably discharged on 26 November 1974.

On 13 March 1976, she reenlisted in the USAR with a break in service. She reenlisted for 1 year in pay grade E-4.

On 13 March 1977, she immediately reenlisted for 1 year.

On 13 March 1978, she extended her 13 March 1977 reenlistment for 2 years.

On 12 March 1980, she was honorably discharged in pay grade E-5.

On 20 November 1980, she reenlisted in the USAR with a break in service. She reenlisted for 1 year in pay grade E-5.

On 27 October 1981, she reenlisted for 3 years.

On 15 October 1983, she enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) for 3 years in pay grade E-5.






On 12 October 1984, she was discharged from the ARNG and assigned to the USAR Control Group.

On 14 October 1986, she enlisted in the USAR for 6 years in pay grade E-5.

On 10 December 1992, she extended her 14 October 1986 reenlistment for one year (this extension was executed after the expiration of her term of service [ETS]).

On 1 May 1992, she was promoted to pay grade E-6.

On 14 October 1993, she reenlisted for 6 years in pay grade E-6. This reenlistment contract was signed on 21 April 1994, and was antedated with the approval of the Commanding General, Army Reserve Personnel Command.

On 21 June 1999, the applicant extended her 14 October 1993 reenlistment for 1 year.

On 23 June 1999, orders were published assigning the applicant from the USAR Control Group to a troop program unit. The applicant was serving in pay grade E-7 at that time.

On 9 July 1999, the orders assigning the applicant from the USAR Control Group to a troop program unit were revoked.

On 14 November 2000, the applicant was honorably discharged.

The (then) Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) Soldier Management System (SMS) for the applicant (a computerized summary of the actions which are taken on a soldier) shows that on 18 June 1999, the applicant was told she was ineligible to reenlist or extend her enlistment because she could not complete 20 qualifying years of service before she turned age 60.

On 8 July 1999, the AR-PERSCOM sent the applicant a certified letter informing her that her extension was erroneous and had been revoked because she was unable to earn 20 qualifying years of service before she turned age 60. She had 13 qualifying years of service and was age 55. This letter was returned as undeliverable due to the forwarding order having expired.






On 3 May 2000, the applicant’s promotion to pay grade E-7 was revoked since she was in a non-promotable status when she was promoted.

Army Regulation 140-111, U.S. Army Reserve Reenlistment Program, Table 2-1, Rule A, Age, states that a Reservist unable to complete 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay is disqualified for reenlistment. Table 4-2 of this regulation, Nonwaivable moral and administrative disqualifications, Rule F, is “Unable to complete 20 qualifying years of service for retired pay by age 60.”

Army Regulation 135-178, paragraph 11-1c, states that when, through administrative error a soldier is not discharged on the actual date of completion of term of enlistment, reenlistment, or date of completion of statutorily obligated service, the soldier will be retained beyond his or her normal discharge date for the convenience of the Government.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant was not qualified to execute a reenlistment or extension contract prior to the 13 October 2000 expiration of her term of service (ETS) because she could not earn 20 qualifying years of service prior to reaching age 60.

2. As such, she was properly discharged. While she should have been discharged on 13 October 1999 because her extension was revoked, she was discharged on the earliest date her discharge could be effected after her status had been resolved. She was retained beyond her normal discharge date for the convenience of the Government.

3. Because the applicant could not earn 20 qualifying years of service prior to reaching age 60, her assignment order to the troop program unit was also revoked. She was in the process of being discharged. There is no error or injustice in that revocation.

4. It would appear that the applicant has mistaken her 21 June 1999 1-year extension of her 14 October 1993 reenlistment with a multiple year reenlistment. The date she says she reenlisted is the same date of her extension.







5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___ecp___ ___rvo __ ____rjo _ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003085863
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20031009
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017511

    Original file (20130017511.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * she served on active duty as well as the Army National Guard (ARNG) and the USAR; she was denied promotion to LTC * her promotion packet was pulled due to the erroneous belief that she did not have enough retirement points/qualifying years for promotion * she was slotted in an Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) slot and worked for Army Broadcasting from 1 July 1995 to 1 March 2003 * the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) erroneously listed her in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007076C070205

    Original file (20060007076C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the US Army, in pay grade E-1, effective 23 May 1978, for 3 years. The applicant's records do not contain his separation document and do not show he requested transfer to the Retired Reserve. It would now be equitable and just to correct his military records by revoking his transfer to the USAR Control Group on 20 May 2002, and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective the same date, with entitlement to retired pay upon his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003436C070205

    Original file (20060003436C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her discharge be revoked and that she be transferred to the Retired Reserve. At the time of her request for discharge, the applicant was afforded the option to request transfer to the Retired Reserve based on her 20-Years Letter and completion of more than 20 years of service with no derogatory information. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. revoking the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012388

    Original file (20130012388.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DA Form 1574 (Report of Proceedings by Investigating Officer/Board of Officers), dated 13 December 1992, and related documents * DA Form 4697 (Department of the Army Report of Survey), dated 6 January 1993, and related documents * DA Form 4651-R (Request for Reserve Component Assignment or Attachment), dated 24 January 1993 * an undated memorandum to the applicant, subject: Reduction Under Army Regulation 140-158 (Enlisted Personnel Classification, Promotion, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010894C070206

    Original file (20050010894C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that she be issued a 20-year letter and that she be transferred to the Retired Reserve. The applicant states that she maintained an active status in the Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) from 4 April 1979 until August 1997, when she transferred to a United States Army Reserve (USAR) unit. The evidence in this case suggests that the applicant was discharged because she had reached the expiration of her term of service (ETS) and had not taken steps to reenlist.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011272

    Original file (20100011272.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 April 2000, the 63rd Regional Support Command, Los Alamitos, CA, published Orders 00-108-005, transferring her from her TPU to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) for personal cogent reasons. The evidence of record in this case confirms the applicant completed a total of 15 years of qualifying service for non-regular retirement between 15 August 1984 and her transfer to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) on 17 April 2000. She was issued an order transferring her to the Retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087890C070212

    Original file (2003087890C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her record be corrected to show that she was transferred to the Retired Reserve instead of being discharged. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the Army Reserves in 1978 and has served continuously with the Army Reserves until her discharge in January 2003. The applicant's Reserve command discharged her because she was well past her ETS, and they did not have the necessary documents from her requesting transfer to the Retired Reserves.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017853

    Original file (20120017853.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was told by the 102nd U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Command that he would be retired from the USAR due to unit inactivation with entitlement to pay and benefits at age 60. The applicant provides Orders 117-018 transferring him to the Retired Reserve. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Showing he was eligible for retired pay at age 60 * Showing his application for retired pay at age 60...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060711C070421

    Original file (2001060711C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    PROCEEDINGS BOARD DATE: 18 December 2001 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001060711 The applicant requests that her honorable discharge from the Reserve be voided and that she be transferred to the Retired Reserve. The applicant was eligible to be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009503

    Original file (20100009503.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show she enlisted in the USAR on 11 April 1991 for 8 years. She contends that her USAR discharge date should be changed to 10 April 2000 on Orders 08-128-000002 to coincide with her ETS date and that she attended UTA's on 8 and 9 April 2000. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Orders 08-128-000002, dated 7 May 2008, to show an effective date of 10 April 2000, by...