RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        22 May 2007
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060014895


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz            |     |Acting Director      |
|     |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance            |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Hubert O. Fry                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Thomas E. O;Shaughnessy       |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. James R. Hastie               |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 25 (Authority for
Separation), Item 26 (Separation Code) and Item 28 (Narrative Reason for
Separation) of his
27 July 2006 separation document be corrected.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the reason for his separation was
to attend Warrant Officer Candidate (WOC) school and to accept a Warrant
Officer (WO) appointment, and not because he completed his required period
of service, as is indicated on the DD Form 214 in question.  He claims that
as a result of these erroneous entries on the DD Form 214, he has incurred
a debt with the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS).  He claims
recoupment of a reenlistment bonus is not required if a member is being
separated to enter a program leading to a WO appointment.

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his
application:  Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United
States
(DD Form 4); Memorandum of Acceptance to WOC School; WO Accessions Board
Results; Personnel Action (DA Form 4187) Request for Release From Active
Duty (REFRAD), dated 28 March 2006; Command Action Form
(AHRC Form 2631-3); Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis. Missouri (AHRC-
St. Louis) Orders Number C-05-690867, dated 8 May 2006;
AHRC-St. Louis Orders Number C-05-690868, dated 8 May 2006; ALARACT Message
045/2006, Subject:  Consolidated Policy for Selective Reenlistment Bonus
(SRB) for Army Reserve (USAR) Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Soldiers; AHRC-St.
Louis Orders Number T-07-809522, dated 10 July 2006; Separation Documents
(DD Forms 214), dated 27 July 2006 and 6 September 2006; Oath of Office; WO
Appointment Memorandum, dated 7 September 2006;
AHRC-St. Louis Orders Number R-06576129, dated 7 June 2005; Headquarters,
United States Army Aviation Center and Fort Rucker, Fort Rucker, Alabama,
Orders Number 236-0521, dated 24 August 2006; AHRC-St. Louis Orders Number
C-05-690867AO1, dated 1 November 2006; and DFAS Letter, dated
27 October 2006.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 20 May 2005, the applicant reenlisted in the Army Reserve for 6
years, in the rank of sergeant first class (SFC).  In connection with this
reenlistment, he was authorized to receive a SRB.

2.  On 21 March 2006, the WO Accession Board results were published by the
AHRC and the applicant was selected in specialty 420A.
3.  On 28 March 2006, the applicant submitted a DA Form 4187 requesting to
be REFRAD to attend the WOC school.

4.  On 8 May 2006, AHRC-St. Louis Orders Number C-05-690868 were published
directing the applicant's REFRAD on 27 July 2006, and he was honorably
separated on that date.

5.  The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on 27 July 2006, shows he was
separated under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, by
reason of completion of required active service and that he was assigned a
corresponding Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of MBK.

6.  On 10 July 2006, AHRC-St. Louis Orders Number T-07-809522 ordered the
applicant to active duty to attend the WOC school.  He successfully
completed the course and was REFRAD to accept a WO appointment on 6
September 2006.

7.  On 7 September 2006, the applicant was appointed a Reserve WO in the
grade of WO1.

8.  On 27 October 2006, a DFAS Military Pay Technician from the Denver
Center responded to the applicant's inquiry regarding his SRB debt.  This
DFAS official indicated that a reexamination of the applicant's account
resulted in a determination that the debt of $10,509.49 was still valid and
would remain valid until proper documentation to cancel it was received by
DFAS.  It further indicated that once DFAS received a correction to his DD
Form 214 (DD Form 215), a further determination on the validity of his debt
would be made.

9.  On 1 November 2006, AHRC-St. Louis published an amendment to the
applicant's separation order (C-05-690868) and added additional
instructions that confirmed the applicant was REFRAD based on his
acceptance into the WOC program and that he was authorized to retain his
SRB in accordance with ALARACT Message 045/2006, Subject:  Consolidated
Policy for Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for Army Reserve (USAR)
Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Soldiers.

10.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Administrative Separations) contains the
policy for enlisted separations from the Army.  Chapter 16 contains
guidance on separation for selected changes in service obligations.
Paragraph 16-2 authorizes early separation for acceptance into a program
leading to a commission or warrant officer appointment.  It states, in
pertinent part, that Soldiers may be discharged for the purpose of entering
a program leading to a commission or warrant officer appointment in any
branch of the Armed Forces.
11.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities
(regulatory or directive), reasons for separating soldiers from active
duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It states, in
pertinent part, that the SPD code of KGX was the appropriate code to assign
to Soldiers separated under the provisions of paragraph 16-2, Army
Regulation 635-200, to enter an officer training program.

12.  ALARACT Message 045/2006, Subject:  Consolidated Policy for Selective
Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for Army Reserve (USAR) Active Guard Reserve (AGR)
Soldiers contains implementation guidance and announce additional
provisions to the SRB for USAR AGR Soldiers.  It states, in pertinent part,
that recoupment of an unearned bonus is not required if the Soldier is
separated to permit acceptance of a commission or warrant officer
appointment or to enter a program leading to a commission or warrant
officer appointment provided the Soldier serves a minimum of 12 months of
the bonus contracted period.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant received a SRB
in conjunction with his 20 May 2005 reenlistment and that he was separated
over a year later on 27 July 2006, to enter WOC school, which ultimately
led to his appointment as a WO.

2.  Army policy does not require recoupment of an SRB from an AGR Soldier
if he/she is separated to enter a program leading to a commission or
warrant officer appointment provided the member has completed 12 months of
the bonus contracted period.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to amend
the applicant's 27 July 2006 DD Form 214 as follows:  Item 25 - delete the
current entry and replace it with the entry "Paragraph 16-2, Army
Regulation 635-200"; Item 26 - delete the current entry and replace it with
the entry "KGX"; and Item 28 - delete the current entry and replace it with
the entry "Enter Officer Training Program."

3.  As a result of this correction, it would also be appropriate for the
DFAS to remove the debt incurred by the applicant based on the recoupment
of his SRB and by reimbursing him any amount of this debt that has already
been collected.

BOARD VOTE:

___HOF    __TEO __  __JRH__  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
amending his 27 July 2006 DD Form 214 as follows:

      a.  Item 25 - delete the current entry and replace it with the entry
"Paragraph 16-2, Army Regulation 635-200";

      b.  Item 26 - delete the current entry and replace it with the entry
"KGX"; and

      c.  Item 28 - delete the current entry and replace it with the entry
"Enter Officer Training Program."

2.  That the Defense Finance and Accounting Service remove the debt he
incurred based on the recoupment of his SRB and reimburse him any amount of
this debt that has already been collected.




                                  _____Hubert O. Fry_______
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060014895                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |2007/05/22                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |HD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |2006/07/27                              |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR 635-200                              |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |Comp of Req Svc                         |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schwartz                            |
|ISSUES         1.       |110.0200                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]