Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009652
Original file (20060009652.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  8 February 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060009652 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Mr. Carl W. S. Chun

Director

Ms. Joyce A. Wright

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Jeffrey C. Redmann

Chairperson

Mr. David K. Haasenritter 

Member

Mr. Ronald D. Gant

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, reimbursement for the auto rental, postal, and lodging cost, he incurred, after re-deployment, at Fort Bliss, Texas. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was attached to a National Guard (ARNG) unit, 42nd Infantry Division, in Iraq from 10 November 2004 to 2 November 2005.  When he returned home, they made him demobilize at Fort Bliss, Texas, because he was an Active duty officer.  He was there from 4 November 2005 to 19 December 2005.  While there, he accrued several living expenses and was told he would be reimbursed on his next travel voucher.  He was told that he could file all expenses on his next travel once he arrived at Fort Drum, New York, on 16 January 2006.  However, he was told that the Regular Army was not responsible for these expenses but the ARNG was responsible for reimbursement. 

3.  The applicant provides several copies of receipts and documentation in support of his request. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the rank and pay grade of first lieutenant (lLT/O-2).

2.  On 19 December 2003, Headquarters, United States Army Cadet Command, Orders 353-23-A-2759 were published ordering the applicant to active duty with assignment to HHC (Headquarters and Headquarters Company), 10th Infantry Mountain Division, Fort Drum, New York, with a reporting date of 20 August 2004.  He was required to perform temporary duty (TDY) at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. 

3.  On 13 July 2004, those orders were amended assigning the applicant to  116th Engineer Battalion Combat Corps, Fort Bliss, Texas, with a reporting date of 4 August 2004.  The unit was reassigned to US Army Garrison, Fort Bliss, for onward assignment to Coalition Forces Land Component Command, Kuwait, with duty in Iraq, in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and return, with a deployment date of 1 October 2004.

4.  On 10 November 2005, orders were published reassigning the applicant to Fort Drum, New York, with a reporting date of 31 March 2006.


5.  The applicant provides copies of several receipts for his auto rental, postage, and lodging.  He also provides a detailed summary for each item of expense which shows that he spent $1,076.47 for auto rental expenses, $245.94 for postage, and $686.96 for lodging expenses.  The summary shows that he received $841.00 for BAH (Basic Allowance for Housing) for the month of November 2005.

6.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was requested of the Chief, Compensation and Entitlement Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G1.  

7.  On 13 December 2006, the G1 provided the Board an advisory opinion.  The G1 stated that after a careful review of the facts surrounding the applicant's case, they recommended that the Board retroactively authorized the applicant reimbursement for the auto rental and postal cost he incurred.  The G1 did not recommend reimbursement for the lodging cost he is claiming reimbursement for. 

8.  The G1 stated that the applicant incurred auto rental and lodging cost while at Fort Bliss, Texas, his PDS.  He was not away from his PDS on TDY.  Therefore, there is no authority to grant reimbursement for these costs.  However, prior to the applicant's deployment, the only reason he was sent to Fort Bliss was to deploy with an ARNG unit to Iraq.  His original PCS (permanent change of station) orders were to Fort Drum which were subsequently amended for Fort Bliss prior to his deployment.  After his re-deployment, the intent was to permanently reassign the applicant back to Fort Drum which was accompanied by issuing PCS orders to Fort Drum on 10 November 2005.  However, they believe the applicant was misinformed and thought he would be reimbursed for costs he incurred while at Fort Bliss after re-deployment.  

9.  The G1 states, that as a result, they supported reimbursement of the auto rental cost, he incurred at Fort Bliss totaling $1,076.47.  Additionally, prior to re-deployment, the applicant incurred $245.94 in postal cost for shipping items back from Iraq to his address in New York.  The G1 supports reimbursement for these costs too since the items he shipped included his TA-50, Regulations, and Army files.  He would not have had access to these items for a significant period of time had he sent them back with the rest of his unit, (a ARNG unit), because his follow-up assignment was to Fort Drum, New York.  The G1 did not support reimbursement for the lodging costs the applicant incurred at Fort Bliss that totaled $686.96 because he was paid BAH, at the without dependent rate, of  $841.00 for November 2005 to cover his lodging costs. 


10.  The applicant was provided a copy of the favorable opinion for possible comment prior to consideration of this case.  The applicant responded within the timeframe allotted and concurred on 9 January 2007.

11.  Title 37 (Pay and Allowances of the Uniform Services), United States (US) Code Section 404 provides, in pertinent part, that under regulations prescribes by the Secretaries concerned, a member of the Uniform Service is entitled to travel and transportation allowances for travel performed or to be performed under orders, without regard to the comparative cost of the various modes of transportation such as upon a change of permanent station, or otherwise, or when away from their designated post of duty regardless of the length of time they are away from that post.

12.  The JFTR (Joint Federal Travel Regulation), paragraph U4100 states that a per diem allowance is designated to offset the cost of lodging, meals, and incidental expenses incurred by a member while performing travel, and/or TDY (temporary duty) away from the member's permanent duty station (PDS). 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows that the applicant was mobilized to Fort Bliss, Texas, as an active duty officer.  His unit was deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  Upon his return from deployment he incurred several expenses while at Fort Bliss, such as auto rental, postal, and lodging.  

2.  The G1, after a careful review of the evidence, supported reimbursement of the applicant's auto rental expenses, in the amount of $1,076.47, and postal expenses in the amount of $245.94.  However, the G1 did not support reimbursement of his lodging expenses in the amount of $686.96, because he was paid BAH, at the without dependent rate, in the amount of $841.00, for November 2005, to cover his lodging costs.

3.  The applicant has provided no orders authorizing travel in and around Fort Bliss, Texas, his duty station prior to reassignment back to Fort Drum.  He has failed to provide a statement of non-availability for Government quarters, during his re-deployment.  He was authorized BAH at his PDS.  





4.  It is noted in the applicant's case, that as a matter of propriety he is not entitled to reimbursement for his auto rental and postal cost.  However, in view of the circumstances, it would be appropriate, as a matter of fairness and equity, to reimburse the applicant for his auto rental expenses in the amount of $1,076.47, and postal expenses in the amount of $245.94.  The Board does not support reimbursement of his lodging expenses in the amount of $686.96, because he was paid BAH, at the without dependent rate, in the amount of $841.00, for November 2005, to cover his lodging costs.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__RDG__  __JCR __  __DKH__  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by authorizing the applicant's reimbursement of $1,076.47 for auto rental expenses and $245.94 for postal expenses.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to reimbursement of lodging expenses in the amount of $686.96.  




____Jeffrey C. Redmann____
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060009652
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20070208
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . active duty
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
GRANT//DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
128
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


__

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003635C070208

    Original file (20040003635C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    By memorandum dated 25 June 2004, the Chief, Defense Military Pay Office, Fort Benning, GA recommended the applicant be reimbursed $8,260.90 for his TDY travel expenses. The applicant's calculations of his out-of-pocket expenses did not include the $1,878.50 for his rental car because DFAS reimbursed him for that particular TDY expense. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his PCS and TDY orders were amended to include the sentence “If officials at Fort Benning, GA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015994

    Original file (20130015994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If he had not received counseling by that Army official he would not have shipped his POV at his own expense. A review of the available evidence fails to reveal any evidence showing that the applicant was misinformed by Army officials regarding shipment of his POV. The applicant is not authorized reimbursement for shipment of his POV within the CONUS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018586

    Original file (20110018586.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment and to date no response has been received by the staff of the Board. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the proper officials accepted his documented itemized costs, approved payment of $820.25 for lodging per diem associated with his TDY from 16 –...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005033

    Original file (20120005033.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Orders Number BL-119-0004, dated 29 April 2010 * U-Haul Contract, dated 23 May 2011 * Montana Vehicle Registration receipt and statement, dated 12 November 2010 * Texas Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), Registration Renewal receipt, dated 1 December 2010 * Orders Number 167-62, dated 16 June 2011 * Orders Number 168-59, dated 17 June 2011 * Morale, Welfare, and Recreation (MWR) Auto Crafts Repair Center receipt, dated 24 June 2011 * Credit card statement, dated 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000170

    Original file (20070000170.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was given orders to PCS to Fort Hood with a report date of 15 September 2006, and a deployment date of 23 October 2006. Given the applicant moved his family members in good faith based on the information contained in his PCS orders, this DA official recommends the Army Board of Corrections to Military Records (ABCMR) grant authorization to the applicant for the following: movement of dependents at Government expense (including authority for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020924

    Original file (20110020924.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    a. Paragraph 1-6 states the EFMP allows AHRC to consider the special education and medical needs of exceptional family members during the assignment process and reassigns Soldiers, when readiness does not require a specific reassignment, to an area where the family member's needs can be accommodated. The evidence shows the applicant complied with his assignment instructions and reported to Fort Huachuca as directed; however, he left his family in Hawaii due to his wife's enrollment in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022235

    Original file (20110022235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). From June 2005 to December 2005, the applicant submitted requests for reimbursement for lodging costs in the amount of $1,650.00 per month. Since he had been granted an SNA and authorized reimbursement in the amount of $1,650.00 (the per diem rate for the San Antonio area was over $3,000.00 per month and his payment to Washington Mutual Bank was $1,742.42 per month), he thought his residence was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003636C070208

    Original file (20040003636C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to allow him to be paid for the temporary duty (TDY) expenses he incurred while TDY at Fort Benning, GA. 2. In response to a request for information, DFAS provided the Board amounts of entitlements that would have been due the applicant under different circumstances (had he been properly allowed to sign in to Fort Benning as permanent party or had he actually been TDY at Fort Benning enroute to a different PDS). The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051454C070420

    Original file (2001051454C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also concluded that no reimbursement exists because there was no evidence of “official” travel supported by official orders for the period of time the applicant was attached for duty at Fort Bragg. k. The DOHA, based on Comptroller General decisions and provisions of the JFTR, denied the applicant reimbursement for per diem for the period the applicant was attached and was present at Fort Bragg because it was determined to be disciplinary travel. c. Notwithstanding the determination...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03022

    Original file (BC 2013 03022 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03022 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed $1,293.13 to offset Temporary Lodging Expenses (TLE) incurred with her Permanent Change of Station (PCS) assignment to Ramstein Air Base (AB), Germany. A request was submitted to the Secretary of the Air Force Financial...