Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004011C070205
Original file (20060004011C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            26 September 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR20060004011


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Jessie B. Strickland          |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Marla Troup                   |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Chester Damian                |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Edward Montgomery             |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be
corrected to reflect his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his award of the CIB was omitted
from his DD Form 214 at the time of his release from active duty (REFRAD).


3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 24 December 1968.  The application submitted in this case is
dated 8 March 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant enlisted in Boston, Massachusetts, on 27 September 1965
for a period of 3 years, under the airborne training option.  He completed
his basic and advanced individual training (light weapons infantryman) at
Fort Dix, New Jersey and his airborne and pathfinder training at Fort
Benning, Georgia, before being assigned to Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

4.  He was advanced to the rank of corporal (CPL) on 20 October 1966 and on
30 May 1967, he was transferred to Vietnam.  He was initially assigned to
Company A, 1st Battalion (Airborne), 503rd Infantry Regiment for duty as a
fire team leader in military occupational specialty 11B4P.

5.  While not specified in the available records, the applicant was
wounded/injured on 3 July 1967 and was awarded the Purple Heart for those
injuries.  He remained assigned to the United States Army Vietnam (USARV)
Patient Casualty Company until he was returned to his unit on 17 August
1967.

6.  On 14 October 1967, he was reassigned to the 145th Combat Aviation
Battalion for duty as a pathfinder.  He was promoted to the rank of
sergeant on 18 November 1968 and he departed Vietnam on 22 December 1968.
He was transferred to Oakland Army Base, California, where he was honorably
REFRAD on 24 December 1968 as an overseas returnee.  He had served 3 years,

2 months and 28 days of total active service and had served 1 year, 6
months and 25 days of service in Vietnam.  His DD Form 214 issued at the
time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service
Medal, the Parachutist Badge, the Pathfinder Badge, the Republic of Vietnam
Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Air Medal, the Purple
Heart and the Good Conduct Medal.  A review of his records fails to reveal
any orders awarding him the CIB.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part,
that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to
enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry military
occupational specialty (MOS).  They must have served in active ground
combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade,
regimental or smaller size.  The Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human
Resources Command (formerly known as the Total Army Personnel Command) has
advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the Combat
Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and
served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

8.  Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit
Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel
officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual
members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit
citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict.  Table 1 (Army Units
in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was
subsequently awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm
(RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions
Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation during the period he
was assigned to the unit.  Additionally, he participated in six campaigns
and thus is authorized to wear one silver and one bronze service star on
his already awarded VSM.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant’s records are absent orders awarding him the
CIB, it is reasonable to presume that he was awarded the CIB based on the
award of the Purple Heart for wounds/injuries received on 3 July 1967,
while he was assigned to an infantry company in Vietnam.  Accordingly, it
would be in the interest of justice to add the award of the CIB to his
records at this time.
2.  The evidence of record also establishes that the applicant’s unit was
subsequently awarded the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and the RVNCAHM-FC Unit
Citation for the period he was assigned to the unit.  Accordingly, those
awards should also be added to his records at this time.

3.  Additionally, the applicant participated in six campaigns while
assigned to Vietnam and therefore is eligible to be awarded one silver and
one bronze service star for wear on his already awarded VSM.

4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 24 December 1968; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on 23 December 1971.  The applicant did not file within
the 3-year statute of limitations; however, based on the available
evidence, it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to
timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

___MT __  ___CD__  ___EM __  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the CIB,
the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation and by
awarding him one silver and one bronze service star for wear on his already
awarded VSM




                            ______Maria Troup______
                                      CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060004011                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060926                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD)                                    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |19681224                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR 635-200, Ch 5, Sec VII               |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |REFRAD                                  |
|BOARD DECISION          |(GRANT PLUS)                            |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |AR 15-185                               |
|ISSUES         1.       |157/CIB                                 |
|107.0111                |                                        |
|2.107.0094              |140/RVNGC                               |
|3.107.0095              |141/RVNCAHM                             |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003376C070206

    Original file (20050003376C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his awards of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and Purple Heart. This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the RVNCM and by showing that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001705

    Original file (20090001705.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and any other awards to which he may be entitled. He had served 3 years, 4 months and 2 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091209C070212

    Original file (2003091209C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Although the available records do not contain evidence that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for his 19 June 1967 wound in Vietnam, the evidence of record clearly establishes his entitlement to that award. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066812C070402

    Original file (2002066812C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the RVNCM. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012458

    Original file (20100012458.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his awards of the Purple Heart, the Air Medal, the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and any other awards not included. He had served 2 years, 8 months and 12 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). A...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091450C070212

    Original file (2003091450C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 16 November 1967 through 19 October 1969. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083977C070212

    Original file (2003083977C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 1 September 1966 through 27 July 1969. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083623C070212

    Original file (2003083623C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the available records fails to show any indication that the applicant was wounded or that he was recommended for award of the Purple Heart. The applicant participated in six campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. Although the standard evidentiary documentation required for awarding the Purple Heart is not present in this case, the Board finds that the statements submitted by three former members of the applicant's unit at the time, of which one was the first sergeant at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078375C070215

    Original file (2002078375C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, established the criteria for award of the CIB. Although the evidence of record does show that the applicant was an infantry second lieutenant while assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam, there is no evidence to show that he met the criteria for award of the CIB. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015603

    Original file (20100015603.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Purple Heart, the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), and three Overseas Service Bars. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided for temporary and permanent award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all...