| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann Langston | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Ronald J. Weaver | Member | |
| Mr. Arthur a. Omartian | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).
2. The applicant states that his company clerk failed to put in the necessary paperwork for him to receive the CIB and he would like to have it because it means a lot to him.
3. The applicant provides a photocopy of a citation for the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on 19 October 1969. The application submitted in this case is dated 15 May 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. He was inducted in Cincinnati, Ohio, on 16 November 1967. He completed his basic combat training at Fort Benning, Georgia, and his advanced individual training (AIT) at Fort Gordon, Georgia. Upon completion of his AIT, he was transferred to Fort Polk, Louisiana, and was promoted to the pay grade of E-5.
4. He remained at Fort Polk until he was transferred to Vietnam on 21 October 1968, where he was assigned to B Troop, 2nd Squadron, 1st Cavalry Regiment for duty as a light weapons infantryman and squad leader.
5. He remained in Vietnam until 19 October 1969, when he was transferred to Oakland Army Base, California, for release from active duty (REFRAD) as an overseas returnee. He had served 1 year, 11 months and 4 days of total active service and his report of separation (DD Form 214) issued at the time of his REFRAD indicates that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign. He also had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service.
6. A review of the photo-copied ARCOM citation provided by the applicant indicates that the applicant was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service as a track commander during the period of October 1968 to September 1969. The citation does not contain any authentication or orders to verify its authenticity. The award is also not documented in his records.
7. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, established the criteria for award of the CIB. It states, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for the CIB, an individual must be an infantryman with an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS) and must perform duty as an infantryman, as a member of an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size, during any period in which that unit was engaged in ground combat. Battle participation credit alone is not sufficient.
8. That regulation also established the criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM was established by Executive Order 8809, 28 June 1941 and was amended by Executive Order 9323, 1943 and by Executive Order 10444, 10 April 1953 and is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM.
9. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s units were subsequently awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation during the period he was assigned to the units. It also shows that the applicant participated in four campaigns during his assignments in Vietnam and is authorized four bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded VSM.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board; however, the evidence of record fails to show that during his assignment in Vietnam he performed the duties of an infantryman in an infantry unit that engaged in ground combat against the enemy. Therefore, in accordance with the applicable regulations governing award of the CIB, he is not entitled to be awarded that badge.
2. Additionally, the Board cannot determine the authenticity of the ARCOM certificate provided by the applicant. Therefore, absent orders authorizing that award, there is no basis to add that award to his DD Form 214.
3. However, the applicant was entitled to be awarded the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation and four bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded VSM. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to do so at this time.
4. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 16 November 1967 through 19 October 1969. This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.
5. The Board found that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he served. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time.
BOARD VOTE:
Jl _____ aao_____ rjw_____ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003091450 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20040122 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 107.0111 | 157/CIB |
| 2. 107.0094 | 140/RVNGC |
| 3. 107.0095 | 141/RVNCAHM |
| 4. 107.0056 | 102/AGCM |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011791
He had served 2 years and 10 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and his marksmanship awards. Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the CIB effective 23 October 1969 and the AGCM for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011812
This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083977C070212
The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 1 September 1966 through 27 July 1969. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002115
On 12 August 1970, General Orders Number 824, issued by United States Army Support Command QUI NHON awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for the period of September 1969 to August 1970. A review of the available records fails to show any indication that the applicant was awarded the CIB or that he engaged the enemy in combat while assigned as an infantryman to an infantry unit in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018250
The applicant states that he was awarded all of those awards and they were omitted from his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM. Adding the following awards to his DD Form 214: * BSM with 1OLC and V Device * ARCOM with 1OLC...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018776
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service medal, to include the Vietnam Service Medal, for each credited campaign participation. After carefully examining the applicants record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 7 May 1969 through 4 April 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091247C070212
Although the evidence does not clearly establish the date the applicant was promoted to the pay grade of E-5, documents contained in his records that are dated as early as 16 August 1969 and all the way through the date of his REFRAD, indicate his rank as that of a sergeant. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 28 November 1967 through 13 August 1970. As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002427
Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award him the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 9 July 1968 through 20 April 1970, and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board believed that the evidence concerning the Army Commendation Medal, i.e., the award certificate, was insufficient without corroborating orders to support...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090343C070212
On 6 November 1963, he transferred to Vietnam with his unit. While in Vietnam, his commander submitted a recommendation to award the applicant the award of the Silver Star for gallantry in action in Vietnam on 2 and 3 March 1964. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded the BSM with "V" Device that was not included on his DD Form 214 at the time of separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009359
The applicant has failed to show through evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that he engaged the enemy in combat while assigned to an infantry unit or that he was awarded the CIB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following awards to his DD Form 214: the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation, and four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded...