Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003597C070205
Original file (20060003597C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        11 October 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060003597


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Beverly A. Young              |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Patrick McGann                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. David Gallagher               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Roland Venable                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, as the father of the deceased service member (SM),
requests his daughter’s Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity.

2.  The applicant states that his daughter was on active duty at the time
of her death and she had no spouse or dependent children.  He states that
no one received the SBP annuity at the time of his daughter’s death.  He
also states he is the next of kin.

3.  The applicant provides an SGLV-8283 Form (Claim for Death Benefits); a
DD Form 1300 (Report of Casualty); the SM’s Certificate of Death; and the
SM’s Chronological Statement of Retirement Points.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The SM was born on 24 January 1964.  After having had prior enlisted
service, the SM was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer on 20 May
1988, in the rank of second lieutenant.

2.  The SM was ordered to active duty in an Active Guard Reserve (AGR)
status on 5 December 1993.

3.  She was promoted to the rank of major on 19 June 2002.

4.  The SM died on 3 December 2005 while she was serving on active duty in
an AGR status.  The death certificate shows her marital status as divorced.
 The applicant is identified as the father of the SM.

5.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that
military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide
for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

6.  Public Law 107-107, enacted 28 December 2001, provided expanded
benefits under the SBP for the qualified survivors of eligible members who
die while serving on active duty.  These benefits are effective for a death
on or after 10 September 2001.  A qualified death under the provisions of
Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1448(d), as amended by Public Law 107-107, is
a death of a member on active duty who died in the line of duty or who died
not in the line of duty but was retirement eligible.


7.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(d)(6)(A) states that, in the case of
an eligible member who dies in the line of duty while serving on active
duty, the Secretary concerned may, if no other annuity is payable on behalf
of the member under this provision (i.e., if there is no eligible spouse,
child, or former spouse beneficiary), pay an annuity to a natural person
who has an insurable interest in such member.  The Secretary concerned may
pay such an annuity under this paragraph only in the case of a person who
is a dependent of that member (as defined in section 1072(2) of this
title).

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1072(2)(E) defines as a “dependent” a
parent or parent-in-law who is, or was at the time of the member’s or
former member’s death, in fact dependent on the member for over one-half of
his or her support and residing in the member’s household.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(d)(6)(A) is applicable in the case of
an eligible member who dies in the line of duty while serving on active
duty.  The Secretary concerned may pay such an annuity under this paragraph
only in the case of a person who is a dependent of that member.

2.  However, there is no evidence to show the applicant has met the
statutory definition of a dependent.

3.  Regrettably, in view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting
the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

PM______  DG______  RV______  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.




                                  Patrick McGann________
                                            CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060003597                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20061011                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |137.0000                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002747

    Original file (20120002747.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM's record contains and the applicant submitted a DD Form 1300, which shows the FSM was killed in action on 19 September 2005, in Iraq. The available evidence in this case shows the FSM was on active duty when he died. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned by corrected by: a. showing the applicant completed and returned a DD Form 2656-7 and related documents to the proper office on 20 September 2005 and that they were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004649

    Original file (20070004649.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the military records of her deceased spouse, an active duty Soldier who died while on active duty be corrected to show the applicant is the beneficiary for all Survivor Benefit Plan annuities. In the divorce decree presented to the Board, there is no discussion nor was it adjudged that the applicant, the former spouse of the deceased Soldier, was awarded benefits under the SBP. On 14 September 2006, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007333

    Original file (20120007333.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of: * DD Form 1300 (Report of Casualty) dated 15 January 2010 * DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 1 February 2010 * FSM's Death Certificate, State of Texas, issued 8 February 2010 * Daughter's Certificate of Death, issued 11 January 2012 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant clearly states that she waived her right to the SBP annuity in favor of their child, who was born with serious medical conditions. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020079

    Original file (20140020079.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, USC, Chapter 73, Section 1448d, provides for an optional annuity for dependent children of members who died on active duty after 7 October 2001, and for whom there is a surviving spouse eligible for an annuity. The applicant, the spouse of a deceased FSM, requests SBP benefits for the FSM's children. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned by corrected by: * showing the applicant completed and returned a DD Form 2656-6...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009526C070208

    Original file (20040009526C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Carmen Duncan | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage. The applicant married on 2 August 1998.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025983

    Original file (20100025983.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the ex-spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) benefits for the FSM's son. The available evidence in this case shows the FSM was on active duty when he died. Therefore, it would be appropriate to show the applicant signed and submitted an application (DD Form 2656-7) on behalf of the FSM's son on 28 December 2001, thereby entitling the son to the SBP annuity.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001912

    Original file (20150001912.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her late husband's records to show she applied for Active Duty Death Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for child-only coverage in a timely manner. Given the circumstances surrounding this case, and based on the applicant's eligibility for Active Duty Death SBP at the time of the FSM's death and her desired SBP election, it would be equitable to correct the FSM's records to show she applied for Active Duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088931C070403

    Original file (2003088931C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too). Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(4) states that a person who elects to provide an annuity for a former spouse may, at the time of the election, elect to provide coverage under that annuity for both the former spouse and a dependent child if the child resulted from the person's marriage to that former spouse. Records at DFAS-CL show the FSM divorced Virginia in 1999,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003719

    Original file (20090003719.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 1 September 1979, the FSM authenticated a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) that shows he was married, that he elected spouse only coverage, that he elected to provide an annuity based on the full amount of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017320

    Original file (20060017320.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, as the son of a service member (SM), requests that his father’s military records be corrected by canceling his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election for spouse coverage. The SM attempted to revoke his RSFPP election in 1961. The SM had a 1-year option from 17 May 1998 to 18 May 1999 to terminate his participation in the SBP.