Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009526C070208
Original file (20040009526C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           17 May 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040009526


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John N. Slone                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Robert Duecaster              |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Carmen Duncan                 |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he elected
to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for
spouse coverage.

2.  The applicant states that when he received his notification of
eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) he was not
married.  When he did marry, he was unaware that he could have enrolled in
the RCSBP within his first year of marriage.  He discovered this error
while at his mobilization station.  Even though the error was discovered in
December 2003, they decided to wait until he was home on leave and able to
sign all the forms himself.  He is aware that while he is on active duty
his wife is automatically protected under the SBP.  He will be deploying
again in June 2005.

3.  The applicant provides his 20-year letter; his marriage certificate; a
DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending
22 November 1978; a DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 October 2004; a
copy of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record); a printout of his
Soldier Data from the U. S. Army Human Resources Command website; and a DD
Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) dated 27 July 2004.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 27 April 1957.  He was released from active
duty with the Regular Army on 22 November 1978 and transferred to the U. S.
Army Reserve.

2.  The applicant's 20-year letter is dated 12 March 1997.  His 20-year
letter informed him he was entitled to participate in the RCSBP and
provided detailed information with the letter.  He apparently was not
married at the time and did not make an RCSBP election.

3.  The applicant married on 2 August 1998.  He was promoted to command
sergeant major on 1 November 1999.

4.  The applicant provided a DD Form 1883 dated 27 July 2004 indicating he
desired spouse only RCSBP coverage, full base amount, option C.

5.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way
for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60
to
provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age
60.  Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline enrollment and
choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B)  elect that a
beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment
of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C)  elect that a
beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age
60.

6.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is
not married or has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate
in the SBP but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to
participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the
person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within
one year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that
dependent child.

7.  Public Law 107-107, enacted 28 December 2001, provided expanded
benefits under the SBP for the qualified survivors of eligible members who
die in the line of duty while serving on active duty.  These benefits are
effective for a death on or after 10 September 2001.  A qualified death
under the provisions of Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(d), as amended
by Public Law 107-107, is a death of a member on active duty who died in
the line of duty or died not in the line of duty but was retirement
eligible.

8.  The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 establishes
an Open Season to be conducted 1 October 2005 to 30 September 2006.  It
required that enrollees live two years from the effective date of election
for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity.  The retiree must pay
monthly premiums starting on the date of enrollment and a buy-in premium
covering all the costs that would have been paid for the election if it had
been made at the first opportunity to do so.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was a senior noncommissioned officer, had received
detailed information on the RCSBP about 18 months earlier, and should have
known to inquire about enrolling in the RCSBP for spouse coverage after his
marriage.  In addition, he was in an active status and could have inquired
from his unit what financial steps he should be considering since he had
married.

2.  The applicant will deploy again shortly and, as he understands, his
spouse will have automatic SBP protection should he die while on active
duty.

3.  As for the RCSBP, the applicant will have a one-year opportunity
beginning on 1 October 2005 during which he may enroll.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jns___  __rd____  __cd___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.




            ___John N. Slone____
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040009526                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050517                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |137.02                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013725C070206

    Original file (20050013725C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022079

    Original file (20100022079.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his records be corrected to show he elected "spouse" Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage instead of "children only" coverage. The evidence of record shows that the applicant made his initial RCSBP election on 20 September 1991, after he became retirement eligible. Since he married his spouse in February 1997, he's had three opportunities to add his spouse to his RCSBP coverage: 4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009413

    Original file (20100009413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his military records be corrected by changing his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election from children only to spouse coverage. The applicant married in September 2000 and he had one year from his date of marriage to enroll in the RCSBP for spouse coverage. Since there is no evidence which shows the applicant attempted to enroll in the SBP within one year of his marriage, regrettably, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023506

    Original file (20110023506.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election that shows the applicant married Pamela R. R----, on 6 October 2007; that he had no dependent children; and he elected to participate in the SBP with spouse only coverage, based on full gross retired pay, with the full enrollment premium amount deducted from his retired pay in 24 monthly installments. The applicant married on 6 October 2007; however, there is no evidence that he elected RCSBP spouse coverage within 1 year of the marriage date. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001813

    Original file (20120001813.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to change his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election from "children" to "spouse" only." The evidence of record shows the applicant executed a DD Form 1883 on 28 May 1991, electing "children only" coverage under option C (immediate coverage). In this case, the applicant and his spouse were married on 10 October 1991.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001368C071029

    Original file (20070001368C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 3 April 1996, the applicant completed a DD Form 1883 and elected to participate in the RCSBP for child only coverage (for a child born on 1 January 1978), full base amount, option C. He was not married at the time. The applicant was not married when he completed his original DD Form 1883 in April 1996 and elected to participate in the RCSBP for child...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069754C070402

    Original file (2002069754C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The applicant was married to the FSM for over 20 years of his military career. That the applicant be paid an annuity based upon the FSM’s election to participate in the RCSBP retroactive to the date of his death.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012389

    Original file (20090012389.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He indicates that if his records are corrected to show he elected spouse coverage he should not owe back pay for 10 years, only 2 years. The applicant provided a DD Form 2656-6, dated 18 July 2006, which shows he elected to change his SBP election from child only to spouse only. The applicant married on 30 May 1998 and he had one year from his date of marriage to enroll in the SBP for spouse coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005892

    Original file (20080005892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that she and the FSM married on 29 December 2003 and that they made application for retired pay at age 60 on 8 November 2005. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008620

    Original file (20090008620.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This letter notified the FSM that he had completed the required years of service and he would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. The FSM's records indicate that he had no eligible dependents at the time he made his election and declined to participate in the RCSBP 3. Although the FSM had two opportunities during which to enroll the applicant in the RCSBP, his record is devoid of any evidence and the applicant has failed to provide any evidence that the FSM attempted to...