Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001306C070205
Original file (20060001306C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        7 NOVEMBER 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060001306


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Gale J. Thomas                |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Patrick McGann                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Richard Sayre                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. David Haasenritter            |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected by showing he was
promoted to the pay grade of E-4.

2.  The applicant states that he was promoted to the pay grade of E-4 on
15 August 1960, as shown on his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).


3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DA Form 20 and a copy of his DD
Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or
Discharge) in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 12 January 1961.  The application submitted in this case is
dated14 January 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 March 1958, for a
period of 3 years, in the pay grade of E-1.

4.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-2 and E-3 on 19 July 1958 and
3 December 1958, respectively.

5.  The applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record), covering the period 19
March 1958 to 12 January 1961, shows his highest rank as E-3.

6.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was promoted to
Specialist Four, effective 15 August 1960.  However, his Enlisted Personnel
Data Sheet, dated 2 November 1960, shows his grade as Private First Class
(PFC),
E-3.


7.  The applicant's expiration term of service Report of Medical
Examination and his Report of Medical History show his grade as PFC, E-3.

8.  The applicant was honorably discharged on 12 January 1961, under the
provisions of Army Regulation 635-205, to attend school.  His DD Form 214
indicates he was separated in the grade and rank of PFC, E-3.  The
applicant signed his DD Form 214 authenticating its accuracy.

9.  U.S. Army Reserve transfer documents and assignment orders published
after his separation shows his grade as E-3.

10.  There is no documentation to include pay vouchers in the applicant's
records to confirm that he was recommended for or promoted to pay grade E-
4.

11.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations), in effect at the time,
provided that all available records will be used for preparing the DD Form
214, including the DA Form 24 (Service Record), and the DA Form 20
(Enlisted Qualification Record).  The individual being separated will sign
in item 34 of the DD Form 214 in the presence of the officer signing in
item 35b.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant provided a copy of his DA Form 20 that lists in item
33 (Record of Assignments) his grade as Specialist Four, with an effective
date of 15 August 1960.  However, there are no promotion orders or other
documents to substantiate this promotion.

2.  There is no evidence, such as a leave and earning statement, to verify
that the applicant was in fact promoted to E-4 on 15 August 1960.  Further,
there are several documents dated after 15 August 1960 that show his grade
as E-3 and not E-4.

3.  The applicant signed his DD Form 214 at the time of his separation,
attesting to its accuracy which showed his grade as PFC (P) E-3.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in
error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would
satisfy that requirement.




5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 12 January 1961; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on
11 January 1964.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of
limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to
show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to
timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___PM __  __RS ___  ___DH __  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  _____Patrick McGann________
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060001306                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20061107                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |131.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017768

    Original file (20120017768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided Elvis Presley's (SGT Presley) DD Form 214 which shows SGT Presley was drafted into the Army of the United States on 24 March 1958. Additionally, he states he had a better service record than SGT Presley. The ABCMR considers cases based on the evidence in an applicant's service record and the evidence they provide to support and strengthen the case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006291

    Original file (20120006291.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states the following new facts are not reflected in his Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceeding nor are they reflected in his military records (DA Form 24 (Service Record) and DD Form 214): a. He provides his DA Form 24, prepared on 22 January 1962, for the period 28 October 1955 to 26 October 1957; and his DA Form 20. His record contains: * DA Form 24 for the period 28 October 1955 to 25 October 1957 which shows he was promoted to SP3 (T) on 24 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000031

    Original file (20090000031.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The FSM's military personnel record contains an AGPZ Form 27 (Statement of Service Enlisted Personnel - Retirement), dated 6 June 1960, which was completed for the FSM during his retirement processing. He held the rank of SFC and pay grade E-6 on the date of his REFRAD for the purpose of retirement, 31 May 1961, and he was appropriately placed on the Retired List in that rank and pay grade on 1 June 1961.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017884

    Original file (20140017884.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that his DD Form 214 correctly shows the rank/grade (i.e., SGT/E-5) that he held on the date he was REFRAD. The evidence of record shows that the applicant's discharge orders correctly show the rank/grade (i.e., SSGT/E-6) that he held on the date he was discharged from the USAR. Further, his military personnel records, including his DD Form 214 and USAR discharge orders, correctly show his rank/ grade at the time of his separation from active duty and also at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058920C070421

    Original file (2001058920C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted on 16 October 1956 and served on active duty through 19 August 1958, a period of 1 year, 9 months, and 25 days, plus 9 days lost time. On 27 March 1962, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army and served continuously until retirement as a First Sergeant, pay grade E-8, on 31 July 1985, with 23 years, 4 months, and 5 days creditable active service. By letter dated 27 April 2001, the NPRC, Military Personnel Records, St. Louis,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009465

    Original file (20070009465.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show that he reenlisted on 13 January 1950 in the grade of Technician 5th Grade instead of private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3, as reflected in his personnel record. The applicant contends that he is entitled to correction of his records to show that he reenlisted on 13 January 1950 in the grade of Technician 5th Grade instead of private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3, as reflected on his personnel record. Evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066562C070402

    Original file (2002066562C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The FSM’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains an Application for Retirement (DA Form 2339), dated 9 January 1961, which confirms that he requested voluntary retirement, in the rank of SFC and pay grade of E-6, on 31 March 1961. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that the FSM’s record should be corrected to reflect the pay grade E-7 corresponding to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011288

    Original file (20110011288.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 18...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040006089C070208

    Original file (040006089C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his 11 August 1961 honorable discharge certificate from the United States Army Reserve be corrected to show that his pay grade was E-7 and not E-6. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. On 16 September 1958, at the conclusion of the applicant’s 1955 service contract, an honorable discharge certificate was issued which indicated that the applicant was discharged in the rank of MSgt (master sergeant), grade E-7.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075617C070403

    Original file (2002075617C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his records be corrected to show he enlisted in pay grade E-5 or at least E-4 and that he receive back pay and interest. ...