Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066562C070402
Original file (2002066562C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 16 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002066562

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright Chairperson
Ms. Melinda M. Darby Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show a corresponding pay grade of E-7 to his rank title of sergeant first class (SFC).

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that the FSM was not granted a corresponding pay grade of E-7 when he was promoted to SFC.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM’s military records show:

On 31 March 1961, the FSM was released from active duty (REFRAD) for the purpose of retirement after completing a total of 20 years and 9 days of active military service. The separation document (DD Form 214) issued to and authenticated by the FSM on the date of his separation confirms, he held the rank and pay grade of SFC/E-6 on his separation date.

The FSM’s Service Record (DA Form 24), which documents his record of service from 22 July 1949 through 31 March 1961, confirms in Section I (Appointments, Promotions, or Reductions), that the FSM was promoted to the rank of SFC with a corresponding pay grade of E-6 on 29 October 1956, and that this was the highest rank and pay grade he held and served in while on active duty.

The FSM’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains an Application for Retirement (DA Form 2339), dated 9 January 1961, which confirms that he requested voluntary retirement, in the rank of SFC and pay grade of E-6, on
31 March 1961. It also verifies that his grade at retirement would be SFC/E-6. In addition, there is an Office of the Adjutant General (OTAG), Department of the Army (DA), letter, dated 24 February 1961, on file that approved the FSM’s retirement. Enclosed with this letter, is an extract of DA Special Orders Number 48, which authorized the FSM’s retirement in the rank of SFC and pay grade of E-6, and his placement on the Retired List in that rank and pay grade on
1 April 1961. A Certification of Information for Retirement Pay (DD Form 424) on file also verifies that the grade in which the FSM was retired was SFC/E-6.

In 1958, the Army changed the enlisted rank structure. This resulted in the rank title of master sergeant (MSG) corresponding with the pay grade of E-8; the rank title of SFC corresponding to the pay grade E-7; and the rank title of staff sergeant (SSG) corresponding to the pay grade E-6. However, this structure change did not impact either the rank title or the pay grade of personnel that had been promoted prior to the change, which is the operative policy in this case. In other words, unless subsequently promoted under the new system, members who had been promoted to MSG and SFC prior to the 1958 change retained those rank titles and the pay grades that were applicable prior to the change, which were E-7 for MSG and E-6 for SFC.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that the FSM’s record should be corrected to reflect the pay grade E-7 corresponding to his retired rank title of SFC. However, it finds insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2. At the time of the 1958 change to the Army’s enlisted structure, the governing policy provided for members, who had been promoted to MSG and SFC prior to the 1958 change, to retain those rank titles and the pay grades that were applicable prior to the change, which were E-7 for MSG and E-6 for SFC, unless they were subsequently promoted under the new system.

3. The evidence of record confirms that the FSM was promoted to the rank of SFC with a corresponding pay grade of E-6 on 29 October 1956, and that this is the highest rank and pay grade he held on active duty. It also verifies that he was not promoted subsequent to the 1958 Army enlisted rank structure change. He held the rank of SFC and pay grade E-6 on the date of his REFRAD for the purpose of retirement, 31 March 1961, and was placed on the Retired List in that rank and pay grade on 1 December 1961. Therefore, the Board finds no propriety or equity basis for changing the pay grade of E-6 that is currently recorded in the FSM’s record.

4. In view of the fact that the FSM’s record accurately reflects his rank title with the applicable corresponding pay grade, there appears to be no effective relief that could be provided by the Board. However, although no tangible benefits would result, the applicant may wish to contact any Army organization that incorrectly lists the FSM’s rank title as SSG and request that they change their mailing lists to reflect his proper rank title of SFC, as accurately reflected in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). A copy of this decisional document may be used to support any of these requests the applicant wishes to make.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__INW__ __MMD__ __JTM___ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2002066562
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2002/04/16
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1961/03/31
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200
DISCHARGE REASON Retirement
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 302 129.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000031

    Original file (20090000031.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The FSM's military personnel record contains an AGPZ Form 27 (Statement of Service Enlisted Personnel - Retirement), dated 6 June 1960, which was completed for the FSM during his retirement processing. He held the rank of SFC and pay grade E-6 on the date of his REFRAD for the purpose of retirement, 31 May 1961, and he was appropriately placed on the Retired List in that rank and pay grade on 1 June 1961.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008424C070208

    Original file (20040008424C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the retired pay grade of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to E-7. Therefore, there is no error or injustice related to the FSM’s retired grade of SFC/E-6 and no basis to changing it at this time. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 31 August 1964, the date of the FSM’s separation for retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004539C070208

    Original file (20040004539C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 April 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040004539 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was promoted to the rank of SFC with a corresponding pay grade of E-6 on 1 September 1951. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was REFRAD and placed on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078747C070215

    Original file (2002078747C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant’s Service Record (DA Form 24), covering his period of service from 21 July 1949 through his retirement date of 31 January 1956, confirms in Section I (Appointments, Promotions, or Reductions) that on 8 August 1955, he was promoted to rank and pay grade of SFC/E-6, which was the rank he held on the date of his separation for the purpose of retirement. Further, current regulatory policy mandates that in order to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010532

    Original file (20080010532.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's contention that the FSM's retired pay should be based on the pay grade of E-8 because he held the rank title of MSG was carefully considered. In this case, the evidence of record confirms the FSM was transferred to the Retired Reserve in the rank title of PSG/SFC and the pay grade of E-7.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001064C070205

    Original file (20060001064C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains an Application for Retirement (DA Form 2339), dated 12 December 1963, which confirms that he requested voluntary retirement, in the rank of SFC and pay grade of E-6, on 31 March 1964. Enclosed with this letter, is an extract of DA Special Orders Number 34, which authorized his retirement in the rank of SFC and pay grade of E-6, and his placement on the Retired List in that rank and pay grade on 1 April 1964. The evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010167C070208

    Original file (20040010167C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show that he served and retired in the rank of master sergeant/pay grade E-8. The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. The preponderance of the available evidence shows that the applicant was promoted to the rank of SFC with a corresponding pay grade of E-7, and that this is the highest rank and pay grade he held on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072147C070403

    Original file (2002072147C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. This document confirms in Item 9 (Grade In Which Retired), that the applicant’s authorized retired rank and pay grade was MSG/E-7. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was promoted to the rank of MSG with a corresponding pay grade of E-7 on 20 May 1948, and that this is the highest rank and pay grade he held on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005285

    Original file (20120005285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An AGUZ Form 658 (Determination of Grade for Retirement, Advancement, Separation or Retirement Pay), dated 14 May 1974, shows the FSM was promoted to MSGT (E-7) on 24 January 1953 and reduced to SFC (E-6) on 16 December 1957 (per orders). Records show the FSM held the grade of E-6 when he was retired from active duty on 31 May 1964 and he was placed on the Retired List in that grade. Records show the FSM was advanced on the Retired List to the grade of SFC (E-7), effective 16 May 1974,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000694

    Original file (20140000694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), to show he retired in the rank/pay grade of master sergeant (MSG)/E-8. These orders show the FSM's rank as M/Sgt and pay grade as E-7. The evidence of record clearly shows the FSM was promoted to the rank of M/Sgt in pay grade E-7 effective 11 September 1956.