RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 4 December 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070009465
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano
Director
Mr. Mohammed R. Elhaj
Analyst
The following members, a quorum, were present:
Ms. Linda D. Simmons
Chairperson
Ms. Eloise C. Prendergast
Member
Mr. James R. Hastie
Member
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show that he reenlisted on 13 January 1950 in the grade of Technician 5th Grade instead of private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3, as reflected in his personnel record.
2. The applicant states that upon reenlisting on 14 January 1947, he reenlisted for a period of 3 years in the Regular Army in the grade of Technician 5th Grade. He further states that he was not provided a copy of enlistment record, so he did not know that he could have reenlisted in the grade of Technician 5th Grade. He also states that Soldiers at the time did not always receive a copy of their discharge and/or enlistment records and that this oversight prevented him from receiving pay in the higher grade and subsequent promotion based on his 14 January 1947 date of rank. Therefore, he adds, he was not able to compete for promotion with his peers and that his war time record and previous opportunities to get promoted were overlooked, which ultimately impacted his final retired grade of Specialist 6/pay grade E-6 instead of one or two grades higher.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation), dated 15 February 1946; a copy of his Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 15 February 1946; a copy of his WD AGO Form 21 (Enlistment Record, Regular Army), dated 14 January 1947; and a copy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's records show that he was inducted in the Army of the United States on 24 June 1943. He was honorably discharged in the grade of Technician 4th Grade on 15 February 1946.
3. He reenlisted in the Regular Army on 14 January 1947 for a period of 3 years. His enlistment record shows that he enlisted in the grade of Technician 5th Grade. He was honorably discharged on 13 January 1950 in the grade of private first class (PF)/pay grade E-3.
4. The applicant subsequently had a series of reenlistments in the Regular Army. He was relieved from active duty on 31 October 1973 and placed on the retired list effective 1 November 1973 in the grade of Specialist 6/pay grade E-6.
5. Item 33 (Appointment Reductions) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows the following entries for his grade and date of rank:
PFC E3 14 January 1947
CPL E4 21 September 1950
SGT E5 24 June 1954
SP5 E5 24 June 1954
SP6 E6 5 June 1969
6. Prior to 1 November 1954, the Army used WD AGO Form 20 (Soldier's Qualification Card) to record a Soldier's personnel data. However the use of the form continued until it became obsolete and was replaced with the DA Form 20. The DA Form 20 was governed by Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System) and was used effective 1 November 1954. However, on 1 April 1965, this form was further revised to consolidate the DA Form 20 (1 November 1954) and the DA Form 24 (1 June 1961).
7. The Enlisted Grade Structure in the Army has changed several times since 1942. Prior to 1 September 1942, the Army followed the following enlisted grade structure:
Grade 1 Master Sergeant
Grade 2 Technical Sergeant and First Sergeant
Grade 3 Staff Sergeant and Technician 3rd Grade
Grade 4 Sergeant and Technician 4th Grade
Grade 5 Corporal and Technician 5th Grade
Grade 6 Private First Class
Grade 7 Private
8. During the period 1 September 1942 through 1 August 1948, the Army followed the following enlisted grade structure:
Grade 1 Master Sergeant
Grade 2 Technical Sergeant
Grade 3 Staff Sergeant and Technician 3rd Grade
Grade 4 Sergeant and Technician 4th Grade
Grade 5 Corporal and Technician 5th Grade
Grade 6 Private First Class
Grade 7 Private
9. During the period 1 August 1948 through 30 September 1949, the Army changed the enlisted grade structure as follows:
Grade 1 Master Sergeant
Grade 2 Sergeant First Class
Grade 3 Staff Sergeant and Technician 3rd Grade
Grade 4 Corporal
Grade 5 Private First Class
Grade 6 Private
Grade 7 Recruit
10. There were other changes on 1 October 1949, 21 January 1951, and 1 July 1958. However, on 1 June 1958, the Army changed the enlisted rank structure to the one we know today, as follows:
E-9 Sergeant Major (Specialist Nine)
E-8 First/Master Sergeant (Specialist Eight
E-7 Sergeant First Class/Platoon Sgt (Specialist Seven)
E-6 Staff Sergeant (Specialist Six)
E-5 Sergeant (Specialist Five)
E-4 Corporal or Specialist Four
E-3 Private First Class
E-2 Private
E-1 Private or Recruit
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that he is entitled to correction of his records to show that he reenlisted on 13 January 1950 in the grade of Technician 5th Grade instead of private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3, as reflected on his personnel record.
2. Evidence of record shows that the applicant did in fact reenlist on 14 January 1947 in the grade of Technician 5th Grade as indicated on both his WD AGO 21 (Enlistment Record) and his Honorable Discharge Certificate.
3. Upon transferring the applicant's personnel data from the old WD AGO Form 20 to the new DA Form 20 in 1965, the applicant's grade was recorded as "PFC" in Item 33 of the DA Form 20 to correspond with the new enlisted grade structure in the Army. In 1947, when the applicant enlisted, he was a Technician 5th Grade, or Grade 5. This grade corresponded to a Private First Class (PFC) after
1 August 1948, and was ultimately recorded on his DA Form 20 (dated 1965) as such.
4. This structure change did not impact either the rank title or the pay grade of personnel that had been promoted prior to each change, which is the operative policy in this case. In other words, unless subsequently promoted under the new system, members who had been promoted to the higher grade prior to the effective date of the change of grade structure retained those rank titles and the pay grades that were applicable prior to the change. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__lds___ __ecp___ __jrh___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
Linda D. Simmons
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
CASE ID
AR20070009465
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED
20071204
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
(DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
100.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120004185
The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to show his rank as a Technician Fourth Grade (T-4) instead of corporal (Cpl). The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The Enlisted Grade Structure in the Army has changed several times since 1942.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014974
The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to show his rank as a Sergeant First Class (SFC) instead of a Technical Sergeant (T/Sgt). The evidence of record shows the FSM served on active duty from 20 January 1944 through 5 June 1946. The rank "SFC" did not exist during his military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011335
The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable) to show his grade as Technical Sergeant (T/Sgt) instead of "PFC" (Private First Class). All enlisted and noncommissioned ranks were reduced from 128 different insignias and several pay grades to only seven rank insignias and seven pay grades, which were numbered in seniority from 1st Grade (highest) to 7th Grade (lowest). ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017664
His DA Form 20 (Soldier's Qualification Record) shows he held the grade of Sgt upon enlistment in and discharge from the USAR. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in an active duty status from 23 September 1946 to 4 August 1948. However, a few days before his discharge, the Army changed the rank structure.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018013C070206
The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, there is no basis for granting his requests to correct item 3 on his WD AGO Form 53 or his Honorable Discharge Certificate to show his grade as private first class. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017339
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Service) to show the rank of corporal (CPL) instead of the rank of private first class (PFC). The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he held the rank of PFC at the time of separation and the highest rank he held while on active duty was CPL.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019948
The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his father's WD AGO Form 53 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) to show his father was separated from active duty in the rank of corporal versus private first class (PFC). The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. ______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005575
The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 4 October 1954 to 24 September 1957.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020023
The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests the FSM's grade be changed from "T/3" [Technician Third Grade] to "Sergeant." There is no evidence in the available records which shows the FSM held the rank of "Sergeant" prior to his discharge on 29 August 1946. All enlisted and noncommissioned ranks were reduced from 128 different insignias and several pay grades to only 7 rank insignias and 7 pay grades, which were numbered in seniority from 1st Grade...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009876
The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. _____________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.