Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000322C070205
Original file (20060000322C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            03 AUGUST 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR20060000322


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Deyon D. Battle               |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Margaret Patterson            |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Michael Flynn                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Gerald Purcell                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD
Form 214) be corrected to show the character of his service as honorable.

2.  The applicant states the "N/A" currently reflected on his DD Form 214
proved to be unacceptable to the Maryland Department of Veteran Affairs for
submitting an application for interment in a Maryland State Veterans
Cemetery.  He states that having retired as a lieutenant colonel with over
20 years of Reserve military service and receiving military retirement pay,
he desires to obtain a completed DD Form 214 that reflect his character of
service as honorable.  He states that receiving a completed DD Form 214
would entitle him to burial rights in a National Cemetery.  He states that
he was ordered to active duty per special order number 23 dated 5 April
1968 and that he was released from active duty per general order number 73
dated 17 April 1968.  He states that the explanation currently reflected in
the remarks section of his DD Form 214 is considered as insufficient and
unacceptable by the Maryland Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) for
burial rights purposes.  He concludes by stating that he visited the
District of Columbia National Guard Archives office on 14 July 2004, with
his request and supporting documents and that he was later telephonically
advised that his request could not be addressed.

3.  The applicant provides in support of his application a copy of a letter
from the DVA dated 4 February 2004 and a copy of his chronological
statement of retirement points dated 29 June 1994.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 15 February 2000.  The application submitted in this case
is dated 28 December 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  He enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 12 November
1963.  Special orders published on 3 December 1967, appointed the applicant
as a second lieutenant.  At the time, he was assigned to the
114th Engineering Company, in the District of Columbia Army National Guard
(DCARNG).

4.  The available records show that the applicant was assigned to the 163rd
Military Police Battalion, DCARNG, when special orders were published on
5 April 1968, ordering him to active duty for an indefinite period and
until relieved by appropriate orders.

5.  On 17 April 1968, orders were published releasing him from active
military service effective 16 April 1968, and reverting his unit to
National Guard control at the home armory.  He had completed 12 days of net
active service and he was furnished a DD Form 214 that reflects his release
from active duty.  On the DD Form 214 the character of his service is
reflected as "N/A".

6.  On 15 February 2000, the applicant retired from the United States Army
Reserve and he was placed on the retired list in the rank of lieutenant
colonel.  He had completed 21 qualifying years for retirement.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of
the DD Form 214.  It states, in pertinent part, a DD Form 214 will be
issued to members for periods on active duty totaling 90 days or more.  It
further states that the information contained on the DD Form 214 will apply
only to the period of service covered by the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  According to Army Regulation 635-5, the applicant was erroneously
furnished a DD Form 214 at the time of his release from active duty on
17 April 1968.

2.  The applicant's contentions have been noted.  However, he was initially
ordered to active duty effective 5 April 1968.  He was not on active duty
for a period of 90 days or more prior to his being released from active
duty on 17 April 1968.  Therefore, he should not have been furnished a DD
Form 214.

3.  Inasmuch as the applicant should not have been furnished the DD Form
214 in question, it would be inappropriate for this Board to correct a
document that was erroneously issued, to reflect the character of his
service as honorable.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is unjust.
 The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this
requirement.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the
applicant's request.

6.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 15 February 2000; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on 14 February 2003.  The applicant did not file within
the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling
explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice
to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___MP__  ____MF__  ___GP__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  ____Margaret Patterson____
                                            CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060000322                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060803                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |HD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |20000215                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |NGR 600-100                             |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |RETIREMENT (Non-Regular)                |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |AR 15-185                               |
|ISSUES         1.  189  |110.0000/SEPARATION DOCUMENTS           |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009203

    Original file (20090009203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 19 (Current Active Service Other than by Induction) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows in 19a (Source of Entry) he was ordered to ACDUTRA. Therefore, items 19a and 32 of his DD Form 214 dated 11 April 1961 correctly show that he entered active duty for training during this period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008932

    Original file (20100008932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed over 26 years of creditable active service. At the time of his release from active duty and retirement, he held the rank of SGM, not CSM, and this rank is correctly shown on his DD Form 214. ___________x______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012561

    Original file (20130012561.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show: a. he was honorably discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) after serving 2 years of active duty; b. he was honorably discharged from the USAR and Army National Guard (ARNG) after serving 5 years; and c. his service number as "0x 7xx 4xx." The applicant's request to correct his military records to show he was honorably discharged from the USAR after serving 2 years of active duty was noted. His request to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020058

    Original file (20120020058.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides in support of her application: * statement from a retired U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) major * Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) documents * DA Form 3349, dated 8 August 2003 * Two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * NGB Form 55 (Discharge Certificate) * Clinical Assessment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005961

    Original file (20110005961.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 3 August 1994 to show the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. The applicant's enlisted service record is not available for review; however, his interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) file contains Permanent Orders 302-023, issued by Third Army, U.S. Army Central – Area Support Group – Qatar, dated 3 November 2011, that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005912C080213

    Original file (20070005912C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provided a copy of the DD Form 2807-1 and annotated this document, “Final Medical Exam – Passed!” This document noted that he suffered from numerous medical conditions including sleep apnea, hearing loss, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). On 26 April 2006, the applicant requested a PEB. As the advisory opinion noted, Reserve Component Soldiers with nonduty related medical conditions who are pending separation for failing to meet the medical retention standards are eligible to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008692

    Original file (20090008692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Court noted that the applicant filed eight applications with the ABCMR. With his eighth application, the ABCMR determined, in part, that the applicant should have signed a DA Form 1058-R (Application for Active Duty for Training, Active Duty for Special Work, and Annual Training for Soldiers of the Army National Guard and U. S. Army Reserve) prior to entering active duty in an ADSW status and, in the absence of that form, the ABCMR presumed administrative regularity and assumed that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007008

    Original file (20130007008.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his general, under honorable conditions, discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) be upgraded to honorable. Orders D-02-013623, USAR Personnel Center, dated 20 February 1985, discharged the applicant from the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) effective upon his MSO of 27 February 1985 with a general characterization of service. Army Regulation 135-178 (ARNG and Army Reserve - Separation of Enlisted Personnel), in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014465

    Original file (20080014465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he served 2 years of active duty in the Army of the United States, and that he be issued a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for his active duty service. The applicant's military records contained a National Archives (NA) Form 13038 (Certification of Military Service), issued on 15 October 1998, which essentially shows that the applicant served on active duty as a member...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019791

    Original file (20100019791.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the processing of this application a staff advisory opinion was obtained from NGB which opines that the applicant's medical records should be referred to a Military Occupational Specialty Medical Review Board (MMRB) and then through the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) before a determination is made on his discharge. Prior to the applicant's discharge from the DCARNG, the applicant was being processed for an FFD board and possible processing under the PDES. As a result, the...