Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008932
Original file (20100008932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  12 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100008932 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect,

	a.  that the DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show his retired rank/grade as that of command sergeant major (CSM)/E-9 instead of sergeant major (SGM)/E-9; and

	b.  that the FSM's burial plaque be corrected to show his date of death as 2 September 2008 and his rank/grade as CSM/E-9.

2.  The applicant states her deceased husband's burial plaque shows an incorrect rank/grade and an incorrect date of death.  She would like both corrected.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the FSM's DD Form 214 and a copy of the FSM's death certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant requests that her deceased husband's burial plaque reflect his correct date of death.  This issue is not within the jurisdiction of this Board.  The applicant is advised to contact cemetery administrative officials regarding this issue.  Therefore, the issue of his date of death will not be discussed further in the Record of Proceedings.

3.  Having had prior service in the Army National Guard, the FSM's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 4 September 1953.  He subsequently executed several reenlistments in the RA, served in various staff and leadership positions within and outside continental United States, and held military occupational specialties (MOS's) 13Z (Field Artillery Cannon Senior Sergeant) and 71L (Administrative Specialist).

4.  The FSM was promoted through the ranks to SGM/E-9 on 23 November 1975.  On 1 November 1978, he was reassigned in MOS 13Z5H as an advisor to the U.S. Army Readiness Region, Fort Meade, MD, with duty in Raleigh, NC.

5.  On 1 August 1979, the FSM requested voluntary retirement.  On his application, he indicated his rank and pay grade as SGM/E-9 and his date of rank and MOS as 23 November 1975 and 13Z5L respectively.

6.  Subsequent to approval of the FSM's request, Headquarters, Fort Meade, published Orders 223-194 reassigning him to the separation transfer point for the purpose of separation outprocessing.  The orders list his rank as SGM.

7.  The FSM was honorably retired on 31 January 1980 and placed on the Retired List in his retired rank of SGM on 1 February 1980.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed over 26 years of creditable active service.  Items 5a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) of this form show the entries "SGM" and "E-9" and item 6 (Date of Rank) shows the entry "75  11  23."

8.  There is no indication in the FSM's service records he was appointed to CSM.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  The active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation is entered in items 5a and 5b and the effective date of promotion to the current pay grade (from the most recent promotion or reduction order) is entered in item 6.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record confirms the FSM was promoted to SGM/E-9 on 23 November 1975.  He held this rank/grade until his retirement on 31 January 1980.  There is no evidence he was appointed to CSM during his military service. 
At the time of his release from active duty and retirement, he held the rank of SGM, not CSM, and this rank is correctly shown on his DD Form 214.  There is neither an error nor an injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008932



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR201000089

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069609C070402

    Original file (2002069609C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the military records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to read the grade title of command sergeant major (CSM). Special Orders Number 96, dated 15 May 1986, issued by Headquarters, Department of the Army, authorized the FSM’s REFRAD for the purpose of retirement on 30 June 1968. The evidence of record confirms that the FSM was appointed to the grade title of CSM and was awarded MOS 00Z50, effective 1 February 1968,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006052

    Original file (20090006052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was appointed to the rank of command sergeant major (CSM)/pay grade E-9 and that he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of CSM (E-9). The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 2 (Grade) the entry "SGM E-9"; b. item 3 (Date of Rank) the entry "29 SEP 67"; c. item 31 (Foreign Service) that he served overseas in USAREUR in Germany from 10 September 1966 through 17 September 1969; d. item 33...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023324

    Original file (20100023324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), to show his rank as captain (CPT). He was honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank of CPT effective 13 December 1973. In accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 635-5, he was released from active duty in the rank of 1LT/pay grade O-2 with a date of rank of 1 September 1966.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012177

    Original file (20090012177.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's service as a battalion CSM in Korea is not in question. However, the evidence of record shows that at the time of his release from active duty and retirement, the applicant held the rank of SGM, not CSM, and that this rank is correctly shown on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020072

    Original file (20100020072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was laterally appointed/promoted to command sergeant major (CSM)/pay grade E-9. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 2 (Grade) - "SGM E9"; b. item 3 (Date of Rank) - "23 Nov 66" (i.e., 23 November 1966); c. item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties [MOS]) he was awarded primary MOS 13Z5O and secondary MOS 15E5O (Pershing Missile Crewman) on 23 November 1966; d. item 33 (Appointments and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012611

    Original file (20140012611.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * the FSM died on 1 February 2013; he had paid into the SBP for his mentally handicapped son for 30 years * before his death, he appointed his daughter Victoria as his surrogate (a person in charge of probate, inheritance, and guardianship) * the handicapped son began receiving monthly annuity payments in August 2013 but those payments suddenly stopped in November 2013 * when payments stopped, officials at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) demanded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013859

    Original file (20090013859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show two awards of the Bronze Star Medal, three awards of the Purple Heart, and the Silver Star. Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of the FSM's DA Form 2-1 does not list awards of the Purple Heart or the Bronze Star Medal. In this case, there are no general orders that show the FSM was awarded the Purple Heart; there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016579

    Original file (20120016579.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the records of her (now deceased) husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he: * elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage * was promoted to sergeant major (SGM) 2. The evidence of record shows that at the time of retirement, on 11 September 1992, the FSM held the rank of MSG/E-8. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017029

    Original file (20070017029.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the applicant’s last appointed grade was “staff sergeant major” [SSM/E-9 (P)] in accordance with the Department of the Army Message 864767, dated 20 May 1968. Therefore, the applicant's rank at the time of his retirement was that of a Staff Sergeant Major (SSM) and this rank is correctly shown on his records. With respect to the applicant's rank at the time of entry into the period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011598

    Original file (20120011598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's earlier request that the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding...