SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 23 August 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050011905
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual. A quorum was present during the
further consideration and deliberation. The findings appearing in
proceedings dated 9 August 2005 were affirmed. The following
additional findings, conclusions, and recommendations were adopted by the
Board.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos | |Analyst |
The Board convened at the call of the Director on the above date to
reconsider the conclusions and recommendation appearing in proceedings
dated 9 August 2005.
| |Ms. Kathleen A. Newman | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. William D. Powers | |Member |
| |Ms. Marla J. Troup | |Member |
The Board considered the following additional evidence:
Exhibit C – (show the identifying data for the original Record of
Proceedings)
CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE:
9. On 18 August 2005, new information was received from the applicant in
regard to the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records
(ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20050009314 dated 9 August 2005. He stated it
appeared his meals and incidental per diem for his TDY period had not been
calculated into the allowances he requested he be reimbursed.
10. The evidence submitted consists of an email dated 18 August 2005 from
the Compensation and Entitlements Division, Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1,
which verified the applicant's TDY expenses included an additional
$1,560.00 in meals and incidental per diem.
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
5. At the time of the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20050009314
dated 9 August 2005, it was the intent of the ABCMR to make the applicant’s
record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the
time.
6. The ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR20050009314 failed to address
the applicant's eligibility for additional TDY allowances for meals and
incidental per diem in the amount of $1,560.00.
BOARD VOTE:
__kan___ __wdp___ _mjt____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
amendment of the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military
Records set forth in Docket Number AR20050009314 dated 9 August 2005 to
amend paragraph c of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION to read:
c. paying to him all TDY expenses (in the approximate amount of
$6,053.04) he incurred during the period 3 April through 2 May 2005.
__Kathleen A. Newman__
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20050011905 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20050823 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |Mr. Schneider |
|ISSUES 1. |128.00 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051454C070420
He also concluded that no reimbursement exists because there was no evidence of “official” travel supported by official orders for the period of time the applicant was attached for duty at Fort Bragg. k. The DOHA, based on Comptroller General decisions and provisions of the JFTR, denied the applicant reimbursement for per diem for the period the applicant was attached and was present at Fort Bragg because it was determined to be disciplinary travel. c. Notwithstanding the determination...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009314C070206
Since a member is not authorized per diem for travel or TDY performed within the limits of the PDS, the applicant was forced to incur nonreimbursable TDY expenses that would not have been incurred had he not been scheduled for PCS reassignment to the Pentagon area before his TDY was completed. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his new PCS orders included the sentence “If officials at Fort Campbell, KY permit you to ship your household goods, move your dependents, or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011490
Although the documentation is not available, the available evidence indicates the applicant was denied reimbursement for lodging because he had stayed with a friend. In this opinion it is noted that JFTR, paragraph 4129E is clear, in that lodging costs reimbursement is not authorized for a member who stays with a friend or relative while on TDY. While the applicant was authorized by his command to stay with a friend, the JFTR precludes reimbursement for any amount paid out in such an arrangement.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003635C070208
By memorandum dated 25 June 2004, the Chief, Defense Military Pay Office, Fort Benning, GA recommended the applicant be reimbursed $8,260.90 for his TDY travel expenses. The applicant's calculations of his out-of-pocket expenses did not include the $1,878.50 for his rental car because DFAS reimbursed him for that particular TDY expense. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his PCS and TDY orders were amended to include the sentence “If officials at Fort Benning, GA...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003636C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to allow him to be paid for the temporary duty (TDY) expenses he incurred while TDY at Fort Benning, GA. 2. In response to a request for information, DFAS provided the Board amounts of entitlements that would have been due the applicant under different circumstances (had he been properly allowed to sign in to Fort Benning as permanent party or had he actually been TDY at Fort Benning enroute to a different PDS). The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009652
The applicant requests, in effect, reimbursement for the auto rental, postal, and lodging cost, he incurred, after re-deployment, at Fort Bliss, Texas. The G1 stated that the applicant incurred auto rental and lodging cost while at Fort Bliss, Texas, his PDS. The applicant has provided no orders authorizing travel in and around Fort Bliss, Texas, his duty station prior to reassignment back to Fort Drum.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018512
The applicant states she was ordered to active duty from North Carolina where she resided in December 2006 to perform a contingency operations temporary tour of active duty (COTTAD) in support of Operation Noble Eagle with duty at the Pentagon. DFAS's multiple letters stated her claim for per diem for meals was not authorized since she resided within commuting distance to the Pentagon. She maintained residency in both a local address her HOR in Maryland and the residence in North...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01560
Several requests were made to amend the orders to reflect his entitlement to government meals, but were never completed. On 2 Apr 02, the applicant’s request for remission of his indebtedness of $3,553.00 was considered and denied by the Director, Air Force Review Boards Agency (AFRBA) (Exhibit B). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/DPPCC noted that as a result of non-availability, the applicant's orders were amended to read "Members...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03103-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to Family Separation Allowance (FSA) and per diem for the period 30 January 2005 through 17 January 2007. RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. c. Petitioner was “authorized payment...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065130C070421
He goes on to state that the two other warrant officers were paid TDY per diem. In support of his letter, he submits information from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) that his claim for travel payment was denied; DD Forms 1351-2 (Travel Voucher or Subvoucher) for the period 24 February 1992 through 13 May 1992; DD Form 1610, dated 31 March 1992; a letter, dated 10 January 2001, from the Board for Correction of Military Records; DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of...