RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 12 January 2006
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050005984
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Robert J. McGowan | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Ms. Linda D. Simmons | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Rodney E. Barber | |Member |
| |Ms. Rea M. Nuppenau | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests she be refunded $2,012.96 collected from her to
satisfy a debt.
2. The applicant states the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)
made a pay adjustment error that resulted in a basic pay overpayment from
May through December 2002. She states she discovered the error while in
Iraq and was not able to correct the problem until she returned to the
United States. The debt totaled $4,298.16. She repaid $2,012.96 before
the US Army Human Resources Command (HRC), Alexandria, Virginia cancelled
the remaining indebtedness.
3. The applicant provides:
a. A statement of support from the Commander, 230th Finance
Battalion, Fort Hood, Texas, dated 28 March 2005.
b. DA Form 3508-R (Application for Remission or Cancellation of
Indebtedness), dated 10 March 2005.
c. DA Form 2823 (Sworn Statement), dated 10 March 2005
d. Various emails seeking to resolve debt.
e. Various DFAS 702 (Military Leave and Earning Statement).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant was a Soldier serving on active duty as a Sergeant (SGT/E-
5) when she submitted her application for correction of her military
records. She has since left active duty.
2. The applicant's Pay Entry Basic Date (PEBD) was 21 September 2000, and
her Basic Active Service Date (BASD) was 21 September 2001. In 2002, she
was a Specialist (SPC/E-4) under 2 years earning $1,443.60 per month. On
22 September 2002, her pay increased to $1,517.70 per month as an E-4 over
2 years.
3. In May 2002, DFAS incorrectly changed her rate of basic pay to that of
an E-4 over 6 years and began paying her $1,752.30. This overpayment
continued until 31 December 2002 and caused a debt of $4,298.16. The debt
was imposed in 2004 while the applicant was serving in Iraq. She attempted
to resolve it, but was not successful until returning to the United States
and Fort Hood. DFAS initiated recoupment action and the applicant sought
remission or cancellation of her debt.
4. On 31 March 2005, the HRC remitted the unpaid portion of the
applicant's debt ($2,285.20), but could not act on the portion already
collected ($2,012.96).
5. The Commander, 230th Finance Battalion, Fort Hood, acknowledges a
mistake on the part of DFAS and states the applicant made a good faith
effort to resolve the problem as soon as she became aware of it. The
Commander recommends granting the applicant's request.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was a young Soldier with less than 2 years of service.
She was being properly paid until DFAS generated a mistake and increased
her basic pay. The applicant was due a slight increase for going over 2
years during the period of her overpayment; she was not aware of DFAS-
generated mistake until 2004 when she was informed of her debt.
2. The applicant paid approximately half of the debt ($2,012.96) before
HRC-Alexandria remitted the remainder. Unfortunately, HRC could not remit
that portion already paid and referred the applicant to this Board.
3. The Commander, 230th Finance Battalion supports the applicant and
acknowledges she was the victim of an accounting error by DFAS.
4. Based upon the above facts it would be appropriate to correct the
record to show the applicant timely filed for relief of the $4,298.16 debt
through her chain of command and that the request was approved by the
proper authority, thereby making the establishment of the debt erroneous.
Therefore, the $2,012.96 erroneously collected should be refunded to the
applicant.
BOARD VOTE:
__lds___ __reb___ __rmn___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to
show the applicant timely filed for relief of the $4,298.16 debt through
her chain of command and that the request was approved by the proper
authority, thereby making the establishment of the debt erroneous.
Therefore, the $2,012.96 erroneously collected should be refunded to the
applicant.
Linda D. Simmons
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20050005984 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20060112 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |(GRANT) |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |128.1400 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003872
COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-4 (Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness for Enlisted Members) states Soldiers must make sure their financial accounts are correct. The fact that the applicant was not found guilty of stealing, falsifying documents, or committing other criminal activities to obtain the overpayments has no bearing on whether he was overpaid.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086768C070212
The Board considered the following evidence: He states he had numerous discussions with DFAS personnel, promotions personnel, and the Criminal Investigation (Division) Command (CID) about his promotion to SSG. In order to remain an applicant for the ASAC program, the applicant formally declined the promotion.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105346C070208
In a 10 September 2003 sworn statement a military pay technician for the United States Property and Fiscal Office (USPFO), North Dakota National Guard stated that information on the applicant, married to an active duty Air Force member, was erroneously loaded [in the finance system] in October 2002 at the BAH with dependents rate. The applicant, herself, however, did not so request in her application to this Board. As a result, the Board recommends that the record be corrected to show that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079383C070215
In October 2001, the applicant’s unit commander in Germany submitted a memorandum to the finance officer requesting that the applicant’s debt be cancelled. By regulation, if a soldier decides to submit an application for remission or cancellation of indebtedness, and properly notifies unit and finance officials, the debt collection process should be suspended until a final decision is made on the application. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011545
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: self-authored statements; U.S. Army Human Resources Command (USAHRC) memorandum, dated 6 March 2009; U.S. Central Command, Joint Security Office memorandum, dated 26 November 2008; 9th Financial Management Company Memorandum for Record, dated 11 December 2008; DD Form 139 (Pay Adjustment Authorization), dated 11 December 2008; D Company, 230th Financial...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03097611C070212
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In an undated memorandum, the applicant’s battalion commander reiterated the applicant’s claim that she was told not to worry about her excess household goods and that she had been informed that if she was charged at all she would received notification “well ahead of time.” He confirmed that the applicant submitted an application for remission/cancellation of her debt on the same day she...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002065380C070402
On 3 March 2001, the applicant completed and his commander signed an Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness, DA Form 3508-R. At that time he owed two debts totaling $4,496.80 due to overpayment of his pay and allowances when his PEBD was calculated incorrectly, $1,198.88 of which had been collected. The Board believes that had the PERSCOM acted upon the applicant’s request for remission or cancellation of this indebtedness prior to any collections being made by DFAS,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074808C070403
On the same date, he forwarded a memorandum to DFAS, Fort Knox and further recommended that the applicant's request for remission/ cancellation of indebtedness be approved. The applicant's commander also recommended that, if DFAS determined the applicant was responsible for part or all of the debt, repayment be made over a 24-month period. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant's debt to the US Government in the amount...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04101211C070208
The applicant states that he was provided the incorrect form in November 2000 when he applied for remission of his debt and consequently, the money was taken from his pay. That command indicated that PERSCOM had returned the applicant's request for remission or cancellation of indebtedness in July 2001 because it was incomplete and stated that the application provided to them with the request for an advisory opinion was also incomplete. His March 2003 LES indicates that his indebtedness...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014517
The applicants unit commander prepared a Memorandum for Record, dated 5 August 2009, confirming the following: a. e. HRC-St. Louis should submit pay documents for the applicant and publish a discharge order effective after the date of her last drill. As a result, the Board recommends that DFAS waive the debt incurred by the applicant based on the erroneous payment of allowances for Reserve drills performed between 7 August and 5 November 2007 in the interest of equity.