| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Member | |
| Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his debt be cancelled and he be refunded the monies already collected from him.
3. The applicant states that he tried for seven years to get the problem caused by the miscalculation of his pay entry basic date (PEBD) and basic active service date resolved.
4. The applicant’s military records show that after having had prior service, he reenlisted in the Regular Army on 22 June 1994. A Statement of Service For Computation of Length of Service for Pay Purposes, DA Form 1506, was prepared on four occasions and each form calculated a different PEBD on the applicant.
5. Around March 1997, the applicant was notified he was in debt to the government as a result of his PEBD miscalculation. He submitted a request for remission and/or cancellation of indebtedness to Fort McPherson, GA. The debt may have been suspended at this time but apparently the packet was lost or otherwise not acted upon.
6. Another debt was created based upon the incorrect dates on the DA Form 1506. The debt was suspended for a time and then reinstated. In December 2000, the applicant’s chain of command requested it be suspended again while the applicant initiated another request for remission/cancellation of the debt. On 3 March 2001, the applicant completed and his commander signed an Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness, DA Form 3508-R. At that time he owed two debts totaling $4,496.80 due to overpayment of his pay and allowances when his PEBD was calculated incorrectly, $1,198.88 of which had been collected.
7. Records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Indianapolis Center (DFAS-IN) indicate that although a debt for $2,466.61 was established on 1 April 1997 and a debt for $2,030.19 (for a total debt of $4,496.80) was established on 16 April 1998, no collections were made on this debt until about July 2000.
8. On 3 August 2001, the Special Actions Branch, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) approved remission or cancellation of the applicant’s indebtedness in the amount of $3,297.92. The $1,198.88 that had been collected prior to the commander’s signature on the application could not be considered by PERSCOM for remission or cancellation.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. On four different occasions, appropriate military officials calculated the applicant’s PEBD and came up with four different PEBDs. This resulted in DFAS establishing two debts on the applicant based upon these errors in the calculation of his PEBD – a debt for $2,466.61 was established on 1 April 1997 and a debt for $2,030.19 (for a total debt of $4,496.80) was established on 16 April 1998. No collections were made on this debt until about July 2000.
2. PERSCOM approved remission or cancellation of the applicant’s indebtedness for $3,297.92 of that debt but was prohibited from considering the remaining $1,198.88 that had been collected prior to the commander’s signature on his application for remission or cancellation.
3. The evidence shows that the applicant took immediate action to satisfy the requirement for submitting an application for remission or cancellation of his indebtedness when his indebtedness first became known in 1997 (prior to the establishment of his second debt). The packet was lost for an unknown reason although it appears collection of the debt had been suspended since it was not until 2000 that efforts were again initiated to collect the debt. At that time, the applicant again took steps to resolve the issue.
4. While the Board recognizes that the Army is not liable for the erroneous actions of its officers, agents, or employees, even though committed in the performance of their duties, the Board believes that it would be in the interest of justice and equity to grant the full relief requested.
5. The Board believes that had the PERSCOM acted upon the applicant’s request for remission or cancellation of this indebtedness prior to any collections being made by DFAS, PERSCOM would have remitted or cancelled the entire debt.
6. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:
a. showing the applicant completed and his commander signed a DA Form 3508-R on 1 June 1998 requesting remission or cancellation of his indebtedness for a total amount of $4,496.80; and
b. showing that the DA From 3508-R was received and processed by the appropriate office at PERSCOM and approved for remission or cancellation of the total amount of $4,496.80 prior to any collection being made by DFAS.
2. That, as a result of the above corrections, any collections made by DFAS for this indebtedness be refunded to the applicant as an erroneous collection.
BOARD VOTE:
__slp___ __sk____ __eja___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Shirley L. Powell
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001065380 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020319 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 128.10 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066095C070421
The applicant claims that several incorrect Department of the Army (DA) Forms 1506 (Statement of Service-Computation of Length of Service for Pay Purposes) were submitted on him and that one prepared on 1 December 1998, resulted in the erroneous debt. On 13 July 2000, the applicant submitted an application for remission or cancellation of indebtedness (DA 3508-R) and on 14 August 2000, the applicant’s unit commander recommended approval of the application. Further, the applicant’s unit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102870C070208
A DA Form 1506 dated 13 May 2003 determined the applicant's PEBD to be 24 October 1991 and indicated that he had a complete break in service during the period 14 June 1997 through 27 June 1999. On 12 August 2003, the applicant requested remission or cancellation of his debt. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records might contain an administrative error which does not require action by the Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067423C070402
That office stated that the applicant’s DA Form 3508-R was apparently lost several times. a. showing the applicant completed and his commander signed a DA Form 3508-R on 1 December 2000 requesting remission or cancellation of his indebtedness for a total amount of $6,050.16; and b. showing that the DA From 3508-R was received and processed by the appropriate office at PERSCOM and approved for remission or cancellation of the total amount of $6,050.16 prior to any collection being made by DFAS.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073826C070403
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. She was also informed that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076096C070215
In support of his application, he submits copies of his: DA Form 3508-R (Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness) with supporting documents; a memorandum from Chief, Special Actions Branch, Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM); a notice of indebtedness from the installation finance office with supporting documents; an e-mail notification; and a copy of his May 2002 leave and earnings statement (LES). The letter also informed the applicant that $2,348.60 of the debt...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058615C070421
On 19 March 2001, the DFAS Disbursing Officer, Fort Meade, Maryland, forwarded the applicant’s DA Form 3508-R to PERSCOM and confirmed the applicant was indebted to the government in the amount of $3362.82 and requested remission or cancellation of the debt based on hardship and injustice. It indicated that had the applicant still been on active duty when his request for remission or cancellation of indebtedness was received at PERSCOM, favorable consideration would have been granted. In...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079383C070215
In October 2001, the applicant’s unit commander in Germany submitted a memorandum to the finance officer requesting that the applicant’s debt be cancelled. By regulation, if a soldier decides to submit an application for remission or cancellation of indebtedness, and properly notifies unit and finance officials, the debt collection process should be suspended until a final decision is made on the application. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060263C070421
He subsequently received a letter from the finance office at Fort Jackson on 20 January 1997, which indicated that the evacuation allowances would cease effective 5 December 1996 and that his dependents needed to submit a final voucher. Accordingly, it was reasonable for him to presume that the allowances being provided directly to his dependents would cease once he provided documentation to show that they were no longer his dependents. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076560C070215
By regulation, if a soldier decides to submit an application for remission/cancellation of indebtedness and properly notifies unit and finance officials, the debt collection process should be suspended until a final decision is made on the application. In the opinion of the Board, the applicant’s record should be corrected to show that his application for remission/cancellation of indebtedness of $18,1460.65 due to an overpayment of OHA and BAQ was approved in full, as if the collection of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090619C070212
The applicant requests cancellation or remission of his debt for overpayment of family separation allowance (FSA). His family separation housing (FSH) and BAH Type II without dependents rate were used to calculate his OHA. The amount of BAH for a member will vary according to the pay grade in which the member is assigned or distributed for basic pay purposes, the dependency status, and the geographical location of the member.