| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Rosa M. Chandler | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Ms. Marla J. Troup | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that the $4,038.12 debt that she incurred as a result of being erroneously paid by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) be remitted or cancelled.
3. The applicant states that she should not be held liable for a debt that was incurred as a result of an obvious administrative error made by a third party. She states that she enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) in May 1996, and, in August 1996, she was ordered to active duty for training. On 17 October 1996, she was separated from active duty by reason of pregnancy after 7 weeks of basic training. On 8 June 2000, she enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) and she provided her recruiter all of the pertinent documents from her prior service at the time of enlistment. However, her basic active service date (BASD) was entered incorrectly as June 1996 at the military processing station or during basic training. Her unit's administrative section informed her that her BASD was incorrect. She would have brought the error to the attention of DFAS, had she known about it. She is a single parent and she cannot afford to be without a paycheck. The applicant submits in support of her request an undated memorandum, Notification of Indebtedness to the U.S. Government; a DD Form 139 (Pay Adjustment Authorization); memoranda, dated 3 January 2002 and 16 May 2002; a DA Form 3508-R (Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness); a Leave and Earnings Statement; and a DA Form 1506 (Statement of Service-for Computation of Length of Service for Pay Purposes).
4. The applicant’s military records show that, prior to the period of service under review, she served in the USAR in an active duty status from 29 August 1996 until she was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, due to failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards (pregnancy) with an uncharacterized discharge on 17 October 1996.
5. On 8 June 2000, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years; for military occupational specialty (MOS) 92Y, Unit Supply Specialist; for a cash bonus of $6,000.00; the Army College Fund; and in pay grade E-4. The applicant is currently assigned to the United States Army Armor Center, Fort Knox, Kentucky.
6. In October 2001, the DFAS, Military Pay Office, Fort Knox, Kentucky, informed the applicant that her BASD was changed from 8 June 1996 to 8 June 2000. She was also provided a pay adjustment authorization, which indicated that she owed the U.S. Government the difference of $1,738.92 in pay for the period 8 June 2000-31 December 2000 and the difference of $2,299.20 for the period from 1 January 2001-31 August 2001. The sum total of the debt incurred equaled $4,038.12.
7. On 3 January 2002, the applicant’s commander signed her Application for Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness. On the same date, he forwarded a memorandum to DFAS, Fort Knox and further recommended that the applicant's request for remission/ cancellation of indebtedness be approved. The applicant's commander stated that the debt was a burden unfairly placed on the applicant; that the applicant was not at fault; that the reception battalion incorrectly entered her BASD and caused overpayment; that when the applicant was informed of the overpayment, she attempted to correct the problem; that DFAS continued to over pay her for an additional 3 months; that it was the Government's responsibility to avoid placing soldiers in financial hardship; that the applicant had never been disciplined for failure to pay bills or for poor conduct; and that she understood the Army's policy on credit obligations. The applicant's commander also recommended that, if DFAS determined the applicant was responsible for part or all of the debt, repayment be made over a 24-month period.
9. On 16 May 2002, the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), Alexandria, Virginia, approved the applicant's request for remission or cancellation of a partial amount of the debt incurred $2,019.06. PERSCOM stated that it was determined that there were no grounds to remit or cancel the remaining portion of the debt on the basis of injustice or hardship. The applicant was also advised that she should contact DFAS to arrange for repayment of the outstanding balance of $2,019.06.
10. Army Regulation 600-4 (Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness for Enlistee Members), serves as the authority for processing applications for remission or cancellation of indebtedness. It states, in pertinent part, that a debt to the government may be canceled if it is determined that, based on the information received, an injustice or hardship, or both exists. It also states that the soldier's awareness of policy and procedures will be considered as well as whether or not the soldier inquired of proper authority and was told that the payment was correct.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. This Board concludes that the applicant's debt in the amount of $4,038.12 to the government was a valid debt.
2. The Board has noted that the evidence available indicates that the applicant was erroneously overpaid $4,038.12 and that PERSCOM remitted or cancelled $2,019.06 of the debt.
3. The Board finds that the applicant was a newly enlisted soldier; that most likely, she would not have known that she was being overpaid until she was informed; and that the error was due to no fault of her own. Therefore, in the interest of equity, the remaining portion of the debt in the amount of $2,019.06 should be remitted or cancelled.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant's debt to the US Government in the amount of $2,019.06 is remitted or cancelled.
BOARD VOTE:
__rvo___ __aao___ __mjt___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr.
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002074808 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020116 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 128.1000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086768C070212
The Board considered the following evidence: He states he had numerous discussions with DFAS personnel, promotions personnel, and the Criminal Investigation (Division) Command (CID) about his promotion to SSG. In order to remain an applicant for the ASAC program, the applicant formally declined the promotion.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073826C070403
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. She was also informed that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058615C070421
On 19 March 2001, the DFAS Disbursing Officer, Fort Meade, Maryland, forwarded the applicant’s DA Form 3508-R to PERSCOM and confirmed the applicant was indebted to the government in the amount of $3362.82 and requested remission or cancellation of the debt based on hardship and injustice. It indicated that had the applicant still been on active duty when his request for remission or cancellation of indebtedness was received at PERSCOM, favorable consideration would have been granted. In...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059889C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be reimbursed $6,702.67 collected from his earnings to pay back a debt to the government for overpayment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH). The applicant was also informed by the letter that $6,702.67 of the debt collected prior to the commander’s suspension of the debt collection, could not be considered for remission or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005075
The applicant states, in effect, she has been told she owes the military a debt for 2 weeks of active duty pay; however, she does not believe she owes this debt. The applicant's record shows she enlisted in the ARNG for 8 years on 10 May 2006. The evidence shows that the applicant received pay and allowances for active duty service she did not perform after her unscheduled release from active duty on 9 November 2006 and that this overpayment resulted in the subject debt.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012532
The applicant states she submitted a request to adjust her Pay Entry Basic Date (PEBD) based on her time in the Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) program. A DD Form 785 (Record of Disenrollment from Officer Candidate - Type Training) and Headquarters, Air Reserve Personnel Center, Denver, CO, Reserve Order CC-926, dated 21 September 2004, that show the applicant was disenrolled from AFROTC and honorably discharged from the U.S. Air Force Reserve, effective 16 July 2004. c. A...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009551
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, that upon her return from deployment she completed the Reverse Soldier Readiness Process (RSRP) on 23 July 2013 to include finance in order to stop her combat pay entitlements. Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to grant the applicants request to remit or cancel the remainder of her debt.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062175C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant provided a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004278
The applicant requests repayment of salary withheld by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in October, November, and December 2011; unpaid leave; back pay from a basic active service date (BASD) adjustment; and remitted debt. While he was still on active duty, DFAS collected $49,777.31 from his pay as noted on his October, November, and December 2011 DFAS Military Leave and Earnings Statements (LES). In an email, dated 24 October 2012, Ms. J______, DFAS, explained to the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090619C070212
The applicant requests cancellation or remission of his debt for overpayment of family separation allowance (FSA). His family separation housing (FSH) and BAH Type II without dependents rate were used to calculate his OHA. The amount of BAH for a member will vary according to the pay grade in which the member is assigned or distributed for basic pay purposes, the dependency status, and the geographical location of the member.