RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        19 October 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050005752


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Maria C. Sanchez              |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Barbara J. Ellis              |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Hubert O. Fry, Jr.            |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Robert Rogers                 |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that several training courses be added to his DD
Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with the
separation dates of 26 May 1976, 26 January 1981, and 31 March 1996.

2.  The applicant states that his DD Forms 214 does not reflect all the
military training taken throughout his service.

3.  The applicant provides three DD Forms 214, an award certificate for the
Meritorious Service Medal, a Certificate of Achievement, a Certificate of
Appreciation, and 14 training certificates in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 31 March 1996, the date of his retirement.  The application
submitted in this case was received on 14 April 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  On 31 March 1996, the applicant was released from active duty, for the
purpose of retirement.  At the time of his separation, he had completed a
total of 20 years, and 20 days of active military service, and he held the
rank of staff sergeant (SSG).

4.  Item 14 (Military Education) of the applicant’s DD Form 214, with the
separation date of 31 March 1996, shows that he completed the following
courses:  USAR Supply Course (1988) and USAR Supply Course (1990).

5.  Item 14 of the applicant's DD Form 214, with the separation date of
26 January 1981, shows that he completed Materiel Control and Accounting
Specialist (8 weeks November 1976).

6.  Item 27 (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 214, with an effective
date of 26 May 1976, does not contain any entries regarding military
training/education.

7.  The applicant provided copies of training certificates that show he
completed training courses:  Supplyman Course, Unit and Organization Supply
Specialist and Armorer Course, DSH/GSH Mechanized Stock Control Course,
Level I, Platoon Trainers Workshop Battalion Training Management System,
Unit Movement Officers Course, USAR Supply Course (1988), 16 Hours of
Supply Certification/Testing, Fifth Army Supply Certification, 16 Hours
Supply Certification Training/Testing Program, USAR Supply Course (1990),
Unit Supply Specialist (76Y30) Class 4-91, 926th Engineer Group Food
Service Program Workshop, Hazardous Material Certification Course and
Modual 9 of the Army Commercial Drivers License Program.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separations Document) prescribes the separation
documents that must be prepared for soldiers on retirement, discharge,
release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It
establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form
214.  Paragraph 2-4 contains item by item instructions for preparing the DD
Form 214.  The Item 14 (Military Education) instructions states, in
pertinent part,  that courses entered will be taken from the Enlisted
Record Brief (ERB) and that only formal in-service (full-time attendance)
training courses successfully completed during the period of service
covered by the DD Form 214 will be entered.

9.  The applicant's DD Form 214 issued to him on the date of his retirement
shows in item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign
Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) that he earned the following awards:  Army
Good Conduct Medal (4th Award), National Defense Service Medal (2nd Award),
Armed Forces Reserve Medal, Army Service Ribbon, and the Overseas Service
Ribbon.  This form does not show award of the Meritorious Service Medal.

10.  The applicant submitted a copy of an award certificate for the
Meritorious Service Medal, dated 15 July 1996.  This certificate shows the
applicant was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal for exceptional
meritorious achievements during the period 6 July 1992 through 31 March
1996.

11.  The applicant's service records do not contain orders for award of the
Meritorious Service Medal.



12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent
part, that the Meritorious Service Medal is awarded to members of the Armed
Forces of the United States or of a friendly foreign nation who distinguish
themselves by outstanding meritorious achievement or service in a noncombat
area.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval
through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.
Recommendations must be made within 2 years of the event or period of
service and the award must be made within 3 years.  There are regulatory
provisions for lost recommendations but not for late recommendations,
reconsideration, nor for upgrading to a more prestigious award.  The
regulation also provides that there is no automatic entitlement to an award
upon departure either from an assignment or from the service.

13.  The applicant submitted a Certificate of Achievement, dated 15 April
1984, and a Certificate of Appreciation, dated 20 July 1991.  These
certificates are not listed on the applicant's DD Forms 214.

14.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs preparation of
the DD Form 214.  This regulation provides that item 24 of the DD Form 214
will reflect decorations, medals, badges, citations and campaign ribbons
awarded or authorized for all periods of service.  This regulation further
states that certificates of achievement, letters of commendation, and
similar documents are not recorded on the DD Form 214.

15.  Review of the applicant's personnel records indicates that he is
entitled to an additional award that was not shown on his DD Form 214.

16.  Headquarters Fort McPherson Permanent Orders 007-00015, dated
15 January 1993, show that the applicant was awarded the Good Conduct Medal
Clasp (5th Award) for the period of service 31 August 1989 through 30
August 1991.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Forms 214 do not show all of the
military training and education courses he completed.





2.  The applicant's contention that several training courses should be
added to the list of courses entered in Item 14 of his 31 March 1996 DD
Form 214 was carefully considered.  However, the training certificates
provided fail to identify the courses as formal in-service (full-time
attendance) training courses that qualify for entry in Item 14 of the DD
Form 214.  Thus, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support
granting this requested relief.

3.  The applicant provided a copy of an award certificate for the
Meritorious Service Medal, dated 15 July 1996.  This award was given to him
for meritorious achievements for the period 6 July 1992 through 31 March
1996.  The certificate is sufficient evidence to support the applicant's
request.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his separation
document to show this award.

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 does not permit entries for certificates of
achievement or certificates of appreciation on the DD Form 214.  Therefore,
there is no basis to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to include these
certificates.

5.  Permanent orders in the applicant's service records show he was awarded
the Good Conduct Medal Clasp (5th Award) which is not shown on his final DD
Form 214.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his separation
document to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

_RR_____  __BJE__  _HOF___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely
file.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army
records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Meritorious
Service Medal and the Good Conduct Medal Clasp (5th Award).


2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
the addition of training courses and certificates of
achievement/appreciation to the DD Forms 214 of the individual concerned.




                                _Barbara J. Ellis_____
                                      CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050005752                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051019                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT PARTIAL                           |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.  23   |103.0000/military education             |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]