Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003914C070206
Original file (20050003914C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:          8 December 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050003914


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Jessie B. Strrickland         |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Richard T. Dunbar             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. James B. Gunlicks             |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Scott W. Faught               |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Good Conduct Medal
(GCMDL).

2.  The applicant states that he served 4 years of good conduct and should
have received an award of the GCMDL after 3 years of service.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on
8 February 1986.  The application submitted in this case is dated 8 March
2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  He enlisted in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on 9 February 1982, for a period
of 4 years, training as a cannon crewman, assignment to Europe, and a
$5,000 cash enlistment bonus.  He completed his one-station unit training
(OSUT) at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, and was transferred to Germany on 28 May
1982.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 15 August 1983.

4.  He departed Germany on 27 May 1985 for assignment to Fort Lewis,
Washington, where he remained until he was honorably released from active
duty on 8 February 1986, due to the expiration of his term of service.  He
had served 4 years of total active service and was awarded the Army
Achievement Medal, the Army Service Ribbon, and the Overseas Service
Ribbon.

5.  A review of his records fails to reveal any derogatory information that
would serve to disqualify him for award of the GCMDL and there is no
evidence that his commander took steps to disqualify him for that award.


6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides the criteria for award of the Army
Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL).  It states, in pertinent part, that the GCMDL
was established by Executive Order 8809, 28 June 1941 and was amended by
Executive Order 9323, 1943 and by Executive Order 10444, 10 April 1953 and
is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active
Federal military service.  The regulation also states, in pertinent part,
that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June
1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year
qualifies for award of the GCMDL.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board
has determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his
service from 9 February 1982 through 8 February 1985.  This conclusion is
based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information,
which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the GCMDL, and the
lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify
him from receiving the award.

2.  The Board found that the applicant not receiving the GCMDL was likely
the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of
a conscious disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he
served.  Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that
this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the GCMDL
at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

__rtd___  __jbg___  __swf___  GRANT RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION








BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the period
from 9 February 1982 through 8 February 1985 and providing him a separation
document to reflect this change.



                 Richard T. Dunbar
            ______________________
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050003914                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051208                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |(GRANT)                                 |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES                  |102/GCMDL                               |
|1.107.0056              |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003662C070206

    Original file (20050003662C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with “V” Device and that he be awarded the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 4 October 1966 through 3 October 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004633C070206

    Original file (20050004633C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Scott W. Faught | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the GCMDL. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021010

    Original file (20090021010.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the GCMDL, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the GCMDL at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065933C070421

    Original file (2001065933C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Where possible, a reasonable effort will be made to contact the unit commander prior to awarding the medal to qualified members. Accordingly, his records should be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and his overseas service from 4 March 1968, until he was evacuated to WBGH on 29 September 1968. Accordingly, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to award him the GCMDL for his service during the period of 21 September 1967 through 20 June 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015803

    Original file (20070015803.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Certificate of Release or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show award of the Overseas Service Ribbon, Cold War Ribbon, and the Army Lapel Button. Records show that the applicant served a qualifying period of service for award of the Overseas Service Ribbon and the Army Lapel Button. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090165C070212

    Original file (2003090165C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 31 July 1980 to 15 July 1983. a. by showing that the individual concerned was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 (SP4) on 1 February 1982, that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012808

    Original file (20070012808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (First Award) for the period 3 March 1982 through 2 March 1985. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015034

    Original file (20060015034.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Commendation Medal, Army Achievement Medal, Cold War Medal, and Korea Defense Service Medal. The applicant provides a copy of VA Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim), dated 6 September 2006; DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with an effective date of 7 August 1982; DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards), dated 15 November 1996; 3 DA Forms 3686 (JUMPS - Army, Leave and Earnings (LES)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03098031C070212

    Original file (03098031C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 1 May 1967 the sentence was affirmed and the bad conduct discharge ordered to be executed. The record of trial by general court-martial is not available to the Board; however, absent evidence to the contrary the applicant's conviction for larceny and conspiracy to commit larceny, his sentence to confinement, and his bad conduct discharge are correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010795C070208

    Original file (20040010795C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show these awards. He completed 7 years, 1 month, and 5 days active military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by awarding him the GCMDL for the period 22 January 1985 through 21 January 1988; b. by adding the entry "SWA SERVICE: 11FEB91-16MAR91 to item 18 on his DD Form 214;" c. by showing he was awarded the SWASM with one bronze service...