| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Elzey J. Arledge | Member | |
| Mr. Richard T. Dunbar | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his correct amount of service in Vietnam.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that his report of separation (DD Form 214) does not accurately reflect his service in Vietnam.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted in Phoenix, Arizona, on 21 September 1967. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 4 March 1968, for duty as a light weapons infantryman. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 7 June 1968.
5. On 24 August 1968, he was seriously wounded by an enemy grenade booby trap and was evacuated for treatment. He was subsequently evacuated to Japan on 20 September 1968, and then to William Beaumont General Hospital (WBGH) in El Paso, Texas, on 29 September 1968. He remained at WBGH until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) and was transferred to the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) on 20 June 1969. On 1 February 1972, he was placed on the Permanent Disability Retired List (PDRL) with a 50% disability rating.
6. At the time of his REFRAD, his DD Form 214 reflected that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Vietnam Service Medal. It also indicates that he only served 1 year and 9 months of total active service and that he only served 24 days of foreign service in Vietnam.
7. The applicant’s records also show that he was authorized awards of the Purple Heart and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal; however, those awards were omitted from his DD Form 214. His records indicate that he had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and there is no record of any derogatory information contained therein.
8. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that the applicant’s unit was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation, during the period he served with the unit.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 outlines the criteria for award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). It states, in pertinent part, that the GCMDL is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. It is awarded on a selective basis to each soldier who distinguishes him or herself from among their fellow soldiers by their exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity throughout their service. There is no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander has approved the award and the award has been announced in permanent orders. Separation transfer points will review records of enlisted personnel being separated to determine whether they qualify for award of the GCMDL. Where possible, a reasonable effort will be made to contact the unit commander prior to awarding the medal to qualified members.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant clearly served in Vietnam from 4 March 1968 until he was evacuated to Japan on 20 September 1968. Accordingly, his records should be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and his overseas service from 4 March 1968, until he was evacuated to WBGH on 29 September 1968.
2. The applicant was also awarded the Purple Heart and the RVNCM that were omitted from his DD Form 214 at the time of his separation. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to add them to his DD Form 214 at this time.
3. The applicant was also entitled to be awarded the PUC, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the oversight at this time.
4. The Board also finds that the applicant’s service was exemplary and can find no disqualifying factor that would prevent him being awarded the GCMDL. Accordingly, the Board finds that it would be in the interest of justice to award him the GCMDL for his service during the period of 21 September 1967 through 20 June 1969.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:
a. by showing that the individual performed foreign service from 4 March to 29 September 1968 and that he served in Vietnam from 4 March to 20 September 1968.
b. by showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart and the RVNCM; and
c. by awarding him the PUC, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation and the GCMDL for the period of 21 September 1967 through 20 June 1969.
BOARD VOTE:
___rtd___ __mkp __ __eja____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Margaret K. Patterson___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001065933 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/04/11 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT PLUS |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 189 | 110.0000/CORR 214 |
| 2. 61 | 107.0015/PH |
| 3. 77 | 107.0031/puc |
| 4. 102 | 107.0056/gcmdl |
| 5. 134 | 107.0088/rvncm |
| 6. 140 | 107.0094/rvngc/rvncahm |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066812C070402
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM). Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the RVNCM. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010648C070208
The applicant’s medical records were not available for review by the Board. Inasmuch as the wound must be documented as being the result of enemy action and the documents do not substantiate either that fact or the date of occurrence, the applicant has failed to show through the evidence presented with his application or the evidence of record, that he meets the prerequisites of the applicable regulations for award of the Purple Heart at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003459C070206
The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the GCMDL. The applicant has failed to show through evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record, sufficient evidence to establish his entitlement to the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004435C070206
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 29 June 1966 through 10 May 1968. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him four bronze service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073599C070403
He was initially assigned to the A Battery, 6 th Battalion, 29 th Artillery , 4 th Infantry Division as a cannoneer. Although the applicable regulation provides that the CIB is only awarded to personnel who possess an infantry military occupational specialty who are assigned to an infantry unit that engages in ground combat against an enemy; there were exceptions made through a published supplement which clearly indicates that radio operators who served as advisors in infantry or infantry...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082331C070215
He had served 2 years of total active service and his DD Form 214 indicates that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. The regulation outlines the criteria for award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and provides, in pertinent part, that the GCMDL is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. RECOMMENDATION : That all of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003111C070206
This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002477C070206
A review of the available records which included the results of records searches conducted in 1970 and in 1995 of medical records, hospital/aid station admission and treatment records and unit morning reports fail to document that the applicant was treated for any of the injuries he asserts qualifies him for award of the Purple Heart. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 3...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050016517C070206
He completed his BCT and was transferred to Fort Lee, Virginia, to undergo his advanced individual training (AIT) as a petroleum storage specialist. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart and by awarding him the GCMDL for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004633C070206
Scott W. Faught | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the GCMDL. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the...