Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003245C070206
Original file (20050003245C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        22 November 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050003245


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. David S. Griffin              |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Thomas A. Pagan               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Eric N. Andersen              |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Joe R. Schroeder              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his reentry (RE) code RE-3,
assigned upon discharge from the Ohio Army National Guard (ARNG), be
upgraded.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that:

      a.  he was forced to resign from the Ohio ARNG before completing his
5 year enlistment because another Soldier claimed he was being harassed by
the applicant;

      b.  he has 12 years of military service and he wants to be able to
compete for fair federal employment;

      c.  that his discharge was supposed to be over his claimed impulsive
behavior;

      d.  that he was promoted twice and received numerous awards;

      e.  that the administrative process was abused; and

       f.  that his military service listed in the Defense Enrollment
Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) is incorrect.

3.  The applicant provides excerpts from his military service records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military records show that he initially enlisted in the
U.S. Navy on 20 December 1989.  He was released from active duty on 18
November 1997 due to completion of required active service.  He had
completed 7 years,
10 months, and 29 days of active service that was characterized as
honorable.

2.  On 8 June 1998, the applicant enlisted in the Ohio ARNG.  The records
show that he was discharged on 15 January 1999 due to enlistment in another
component.

3.  The records show that on 15 January 1999, the applicant enlisted in the
U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for a period of 3 years.

4.  On 25 April 1999, the applicant was discharged from the USAR due to his
enlistment in other active component.  There is no indication in the
records of which active component the applicant enlisted in.
5.  On 16 March 2000, the applicant enlisted in the Ohio ARNG.  He was
promoted to specialist/pay grade E-4 effective 1 November 2002.

6.  On 3 April 2003, the applicant was awarded the Ohio Award of Merit, the
Ohio Faithful Service Ribbon/Medal, the Army Reserve Component Achievement
Medal, and the Armed Forces Reserve Medal.

7.  On 4 May 2003, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of
paragraph 8-26i of National Guard Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel
Management), expiration of service obligation.

8.  The facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge are
not on file.

9.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records)
prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records
by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  The regulation
provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the
presumption of administrative regularity. The applicant has the burden of
proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

10.  National Guard Regulation 600-200 governs procedures for enlisted
personnel of the Army National Guard.  Paragraph 8-26 covers reasons,
applicability, codes, and board requirements for administrative discharges
from the Reserve of the Army and/or the State ARNG.  Paragraph 8-26i refers
to Army Regulation 135-178, Chapter 11, for discharge at expiration of term
of service and states that a RE-3 is assigned if an approved bar to
reenlistment or extension is in effect, or the Guardsman is ineligible for
extension due to overweight, Army Physical Fitness Test failure, or a
positive urinalysis, but is not barred at the time of expiration of term of
service.  Table 8-1 of this regulation states that a RE-3 will be assigned
when the Guardsman being separated is eligible for reenlistment only with a
waiver.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his reentry (RE) code RE-3 should be
upgraded so that he can compete for fair federal employment.

2.  The applicant further contends that his discharge was supposed to be
over his claimed impulsive behavior, that he was promoted twice, and that
he received numerous awards.

3.  Without the applicant's military records, the reason he was assigned a
RE-3 cannot be determined.  As such, the Board must presume administrative
regularity and that the applicant was discharged at the expiration of his
term of service with a waivable disqualification for reenlistment.

4.  The ABCMR does not correct records solely for the purpose of
establishing eligibility for benefits.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must,
or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or
unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy
that requirement.

6.  The applicant is advised that although his RE-3 code was properly
assigned, this does not mean that he is totally disqualified from returning
to military service. The disqualification upon which the RE-3 codes were
based may be waived for enlistment purposes.  The applicant is advised that
if he desires to enlist, he should contact a local recruiter who can best
advise him on his eligibility for returning to military service.  These
individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the
service at the time and may process enlistment waivers for the applicant’s
RE code.

7.  The applicant also contends that his military service listed in the
Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) is incorrect.

8.  The DEERS does not fall within the purview of the ABCMR.  To update
DEERS records, the applicant should contact Defense Manpower Data Center
Support Office (DSO) at 1-800-538-9552.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jrs ____  ___ena__  ____tap__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.





                                  ________Thomas A. Pagan___
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050003245                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051122                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004221C070206

    Original file (20050004221C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that after her unit was activated for deployment, she requested to be honorably discharged based on having to care for her 7 year old daughter. The NGB Form 22 issued to the applicant on the date of her discharge, 14 June 2003, confirms she received an honorable conditions discharge (HD) and that based on the authority for her discharge, she was assigned a reenlistment eligibility code of RE-4. Based on the authority and reason for the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001993

    Original file (20130001993.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records contain documentation which shows he requested a 6-month extension in February 2005 because he was pending an MMRB to determine his eligibility to continue his military service. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base granting his request for a medical discharge under Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060424C070421

    Original file (2001060424C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: Normally, a soldier will be discharged or REFRAD on the date he or she completes the period for which enlisted or ordered to active duty.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008805

    Original file (AR20080008805.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record of evidence indicates the Applicant was discharged from the US Army Reserve with an honorable discharge on 020820, Orders D-08-233703, period of service NIF. The record also contains a California Army National Guard Form 600-2R (draft), Request for Discharge of Enlisted Members, dated 3 October 1999, indicating the Applicant was AWOL having missed 9 drills, and recommending the Applicant be discharged with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The record contains a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005495C070208

    Original file (20040005495C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command promotion memorandum, dated on 16 August 2001, shows the applicant was selected for promotion to Major, USAR with a DOR of 19 July 2000. National Guard Bureau Special Orders Number 7 AR dated 8 January 2002 granted the applicant Federal Recognition effective 26 September 2001 for the purpose of transfer from USAR. As a result, the Board recommends that the state Army National Guard records and the Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010783

    Original file (20070010783.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Stone Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's records show that she initially enlisted in the Kentucky Army National Guard (KYARNG) on 7 July 1978 for a period of 3 years in the grade of private/E-1. There are no medical records contained in the applicant's military personnel file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606369C070209

    Original file (9606369C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB also determined that the condition existed prior to his entry on active duty and recommended that he be discharged without disability compensation for his failure to meet established physical standards of enlistment. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017857

    Original file (20120017857.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he had 20 creditable years of service for retired pay purposes and payment of any benefits that flow from that change. The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM's retirement points statement incorrectly reflects that the FSM did not have 20 qualifying years of service for retired pay purposes. The FSM's official records also show no evidence to indicate he was ever issued a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068816C070402

    Original file (2002068816C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders Number 018-010, dated 18 January 2001, issued by the Military Department of Indiana, directs that the applicant be discharged from the ARNG and as a Reserve member of the Army, effective 18 December 2000. Further, the Board finds an unintentional injustice was served upon the applicant as a result of her never being properly counseled on the service remaining requirement for her to be transferred to the USAR, and because she was never afforded the opportunity to take the necessary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053043C070420

    Original file (2001053043C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 July 1996, 17 July 1997, and 27 May 1998, the applicant was notified by letter, signed by the IDARNG Adjutant General, that he had been considered by annual selective retention boards which recommended him among the best qualified for continued retention in the IDARNG. The National Guard Bureau Personnel Division rendered an opinion that the applicant’s record was properly reviewed by a State Adjutant General Selective Retention Board and he was not selected for retention. ...