Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606369C070209
Original file (9606369C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to show that he served on or about 1 ½ years of active duty, and that his NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service) be corrected to show that he served 5 years of inactive service.  He also requests that his medical evaluation board (MEB) be corrected to show that his disqualifying condition did not exist prior to service, that he be given a medical retirement with all back pay, and that his reentry (RE) code be corrected on both his DD Form 214 and his NGB Form 22).  He states that the active service listed on his DD Form 214 does not take into consideration his time in the Army National Guard (ARNG), nor the “multipliers” required to calculate active service (8 or 9 days for every day of active duty served and 2 ½ days for every day served in the ARNG).  He also states when the reason for his discharge is corrected, his RE code must be corrected to reflect that change.

PURPOSE:  To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the ARNG on 27 August 1977 in pay grade E-1 and entered on his initial active duty for training (IADT) on 20 November 1977 to complete basic combat training and training for his military occupational specialty.

While attended training, on 1 December 1977 an MEB was initiated to determine the applicant’s medical qualifications for enlistment and retention.  The MEB determined that he had high myopia, a condition which was disqualifying for enlistment but not for retention.  The MEB also determined that the condition existed prior to his entry on active duty and recommended that he be discharged without disability compensation for his failure to meet established physical standards of enlistment.  The applicant concurred with those findings and recommendation.

Accordingly, he was honorably discharged from active duty on 20 December 1977 and returned to his ARNG unit due to his medical disqualification.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows that he served 1 month and 1 day of active service and was assigned an RE code of RE-N/A.

As a result of the applicant’s release from active duty, he was discharged as a guardsman and as a reserve of the Army on 16 January 1978 for failure to meet medical standards.  The NGB Form 22 he was issued shows that he had a total of 4 months and 19 days of inactive service in the ARNG.  

Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-9, in effect at the time, provided for the involuntary separation of soldiers who do not meet procurement medical fitness standards due to conditions which did not disqualify them under retention medical fitness standards, and the unfitting conditions existed prior to their entry on active duty.  Those disqualification’s must be identified within 4 months of these soldiers entry on active duty.

Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covered eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribed basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter included a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.  Reservists being released from IADT and returned to their ARNG or USAR units are not assigned RE codes, and the entry “N/A” (not applicable) is to be entered in the space provided for the RE code.

Army Regulation 140-185, Training and Retirement Point Credits and Unit Level Strength Accounting Records, provides guidance for awarding retirement points.  This regulation specifies that a reservist or guardsman receives one day of pay and retirement point credit for every day served on active duty.  For inactive (drill) duty, the reservist or guardsman receives 1 day of pay and retirement point credit for every 4 hour unit training assembly attended.
Army Regulation 635-5 provides the guidance for what entries to make on a DD Form 214.  It states that only periods of active duty will be entered in the space provided on a DD Form 214 to record active service.

Title 10, United States Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while performing active or inactive (weekend drill) duty.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION:  The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 20 December 1977, the date he was released from active duty.  The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 20 December 1980.

The application is dated 3 June 1996 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION:  The subject application was not submitted within the time required.  The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.

BOARD VOTE:

                      EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

                      GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                      CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION




		Karl F. Schneider
		Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002463

    Original file (20090002463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He responded by reiterating his request to be issued a 15 year letter certifying his eligibility for retired pay at age 60, and further requests that he be given 20 additional inactive duty points for RYE 12 June 1998 for completion of the Army Sales and Management Training Course which would give him a total of 53 retirement points for that year; and he requests that he be given 4 months credit for the months he was assigned to different units between 28 June 1992 to 27 June 1993. While...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510220C070209

    Original file (9510220C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    After he stopped attending drills, he was discharged for medical disqualification upon the advice of the ARNG State Surgeon even though he had been found physically fit to perform his duties by a physical evaluation board (PEB). This paragraph requires a member who is determined to be medically disqualified for retention to be discharged or transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired) (regardless of years of service), unless the member requests, and is granted, a waiver of the medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610294C070209

    Original file (9610294C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An NGB Form 23, Army National Guard Retirement Credits Record, show that the applicant had qualifying years of service from the date of his enlistment on 2 December 1970 to the date of his discharge on 1 December 1980, for a total of 10 qualifying years of service for retired pay. The Adjutant General stated that the applicant has only completed 14 qualifying years of service for retired pay. Those 2 years, plus his 2 years of active duty, plus his 10 years of continuous service in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104809C070208

    Original file (2004104809C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he completed 20 qualifying years for a non-regular retirement. The advisory opinion noted that the Retirements and Annuities Section attempted to obtain additional documentation from the Alabama ARNG but, as of 9 April 2004, no additional documentation had been provided, in part, because the retirement section of the Alabama ARNG had been eliminated. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009954

    Original file (20100009954.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His military records contain a Report of Medical Examination, dated 28 December 2005, for the purpose of his retention, that shows a temporary profile was recommended until a cardiac evaluation was completed. An SF 507 (Medical Record), dated 10 May 2006, shows he was advised on 16 March 2006 of his abnormal EKG and additional information was requested.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508744C070209

    Original file (9508744C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his administrative medical discharge from the ARNG be corrected to a medical retirement. On 17 March 1993 the applicant submitted a letter to his commander requesting that he be discharged due to his shoulder problems, stating that he would not be able to perform his military duties. Accordingly, on 1 July 1993 the applicant was honorably discharged from the ARNG and as a reserve of the Army due to medical disqualification.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058582C070421

    Original file (2001058582C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The resultant pressure of the internal tissue through the gap in the abdominal wall in the groin area is called an inguinal hernia. The NGB denied the applicant’s appeal, stating that a review of the medical records by the NGB Chief Surgeon determined that the applicant’s hernia was a preexisting condition which was probably related to colectomy surgery the applicant underwent in 1986. The OTSG stated that based on the available records, none of the applicant’s subsequent hernias were the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021413

    Original file (20140021413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the TXARNG on 17 April 1971 for 6 years. c. An ARPC Form 606-E, dated 21 March 1995, showing no retirement points for the years 1975 through 1977. d. A DA Form 3918-R, dated July 1996, in which a MOC was provided five pages of unidentified documents pertaining to the applicant from the ARPC. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the TXARNG on 17 April 1971, for 6 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022139

    Original file (20110022139.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He remained in the IRR until his discharge on 21 May 1995. d. Several years later he received a letter from the U.S. Army Retired Reserve Personnel Command (correctly known as the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) at the time) asking him whether he wanted to receive his final discharge or be placed in the Retired Reserve. b. Paragraph 2-9 states that active status in the Ready Reserve, the Standby Reserve, and the Active National Guard after 30 June 1949, but insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003586

    Original file (20130003586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was injured while entitled to basic pay * his DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated February 2003, shows he was referred to an MEB; but, his MEB was never completed * there is no evidence showing he was properly counseled about his right to an MEB/PEB * he was issued an administrative honorable discharge instead of being referred through the PDES * it was the responsibility of his commander and the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) leadership to ensure he...