RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 22 November 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050002562
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Thomas A. Pagan | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Eric N. Andersen | |Member |
| |Mr. Joe R. Schroeder | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states that he received shrapnel wounds to his left thigh
during his second tour in Vietnam and a report was completed by the medic
who treated him in the field; however, he never received his award of the
Purple Heart. He continues by stating that he served as an advisor with
the Mobile Advisory Team (MAT) #47 and was wounded in August 1970.
3. The applicant provides a self-authored letter explaining the
circumstances surrounding his being wounded and his departure from Vietnam.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 31 March 1979. The application submitted in this case is dated
19 January 2005 and was received on 16 February 2004.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. He enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 29 March 1957
and continued to serve in the USAR until 19 August 1958 when he enlisted in
the Regular Army. He served as a light weapons infantryman and served in
Vietnam from April 1966 to July 1966. He was returned from Vietnam and was
honorably discharged in the rank of staff sergeant on 15 July 1966, when he
was discharged as an early overseas returnee. He had served 5 years, 11
months and 15 days of active service and was awarded the National Defense
Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Combat Infantryman
Badge (CIB) and the Good Conduct Medal.
4. He again enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 February 1967 and remained
on active duty through continuous reenlistments. He was transferred to
Vietnam on 14 October 1969 and was assigned as a heavy weapons advisor with
the United States Army Military Advisory Command – Vietnam (USAMACV). He
departed Vietnam on 8 October 1970, for duty at Fort Dix, New Jersey, as a
drill sergeant.
5. He was reclassified to the military occupational specialty (MOS) of a
counterintelligence agent on 8 November 1972 and was promoted to the pay
grade of E-7 on 1 March 1973.
6. He continued to serve until he was honorably released from active duty
(REFRAD) on 31 March 1979 and was transferred to the Retired List effective
1 April 1979, due to having sufficient service for retirement. He had
served 20 years and 26 days of active service and was awarded the Bronze
Star Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Good Conduct Medal (6th
award), the CIB, the Drill Sergeant Identification Badge, the VSM, the
Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross
with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor
Medal – First Class Unit Citation.
7. A review of the applicant’s records as well as the Vietnam Casualty
Listing fails to show any indication that he was wounded in Vietnam or that
he was treated for any wounds in Vietnam.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple
Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.
Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a
result of hostile action, that the wound must have required treatment by a
medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of
official record.
9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign
Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist
commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the
eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit,
assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam
Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet
indicates that subsequent to the applicant’s departure from Vietnam, his
unit was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) for the period he
served with the unit. Additionally, he participated in six campaigns
during his assignments to Vietnam and therefore is entitled to be awarded
one silver and one bronze service star for wear on his already awarded VSM.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s contention that he was wounded in Vietnam as a result
of enemy action and that he was treated for that wound has been noted.
However, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his
application or the evidence of record sufficient evidence to support that
contention. Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to award him the
Purple Heart at this time.
2. However, the evidence of record does establish that he is entitled to
be awarded the MUC and one silver and one bronze service star for wear on
his already awarded VSM to denote his campaign participation.
3. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative
error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore,
administrative correction of the applicant's records will be accomplished
by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as
outlined by the Board in paragraph 3 of the BOARD
DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.
4. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 31 March 1979; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on 30 March 1982. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-
year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation
or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
failure to timely file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__tap___ __ena___ __jrs___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
2. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law. Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.
3. The Board determined that administrative error in the records of the
individual should be corrected. Therefore, the Board requests that the
CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual
concerned by awarding him the MUC and one silver and one bronze service
star for wear on his already awarded VSM.
Thomas A. Pagan
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20050002562 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20051122 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |(DENY w/note) |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES |61/ph |
|1.107.0015 | |
|2.107.0034 |80/muc |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005774
The citation for his BSM with V Device clearly indicates that he was wounded as a result of enemy action on 15 March 1971. The applicant served in six campaigns in Vietnam and thus is entitled to wear one silver and one bronze service star on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and to have them entered on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019824
There is no evidence in the available records to show that the FSM was ever awarded more than one Purple Heart. A review of the FSM's official records shows that in addition to the awards listed on his DD Form 214 at the time of his retirement, he was also awarded the CIB, the Purple Heart, the Korean Service Medal (KSM), the United Nations Service Medal (UNSM), the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp, and the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) with one oak leaf cluster. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001315
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Although there are no orders in the available record showing that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart, there is sufficient evidence to establish that he was wounded in action against the enemy on 27 February 1968 and that he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010813
Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action, and that he was treated for wounds incurred as a result of hostile action which was made a matter of official record, there is no basis to grant award of the Purple Heart to the applicant in this case. Evidence shows that the applicants records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077699C070215
The applicant’s military records show that he initially enlisted on 19 July 1961 and served as a cook, until he was honorably discharged on 3 September 1964. Upon departing Vietnam, he was transferred to Fort Huachuca, Arizona, where he served as a cook, was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 6 July 1967 and then served as a mess steward. The evidence of record fails to show that the applicant was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action or that he was treated for such.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020485
The applicant requests that his deceased father be awarded two Silver Stars and two additional awards of the Bronze Star Medal; however, there are no orders or other evidence in his Official Military Personnel File authorizing these awards. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that during his service with the Heavy Mortar Company of the 180th Infantry Regiment in Korea, this unit was awarded the Distinguished Unit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009550
The applicant requests the following awards: * Purple Heart * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device 1960 * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) 2. His military service records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 1 November 1966. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the VSM from item 24 of his DD Form 214; and b. adding to item 24...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010717C070208
However, he has failed to show through evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that he was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action and that treatment was rendered by medical personnel at the time and made a matter of official record. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002350C071029
However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that the wound was treated by military medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The applicant's record is void of any medical treatment records showing that he was ever treated for a combat-related wound or injury while serving in the RVN, and the PH is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028538
The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service) he was credited with service in Vietnam from 19 May 1969 through 16 July 1970; b. item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned for duty in Vietnam with: * Company D, 1st Battalion, 7th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), in duty MOS 11B from 23 May to 19 June 1969 and from 9 August 1969 to...