Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010813
Original file (20060010813.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  27 February 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060010813 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


X
	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded two awards of the Purple Heart (PH w/1OLC). 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he received a head injury in December 1969 and was slightly wounded in the head in May 1970 and was told by his commander that he would be receiving the Purple Heart; however, he has never received those awards.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his report of separation (DD Form 214) and a letter from the National Archives explaining that a search of the applicant’s unit in Vietnam failed to reveal any daily journals for the period of October 1969 through September 1970.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  He was inducted in Cincinnati, Ohio on 12 March 1969 and was transferred to Fort Dix, New Jersey to undergo his training.  He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 24 August 1969.  

2.  He was assigned to Company B, 2nd Battalion, 22nd Infantry Regiment, 25th Infantry Division for duty as a rifleman.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 25 August 1969, to the pay grade of E-4 on 7 November 1969 and was promoted to the rank of sergeant on 12 June 1970.  

3.  He departed Vietnam on 15 August 1969 and was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas, where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) at his request on 28 December 1970, for the purpose of entering or returning to college, university or equivalent educational institution.  He had served 1 year, 9 months and 17 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with one bronze service star, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Bronze Star Medal with one oak leaf cluster (1OLC) and “V” Device, the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the National Defense Service Medal.    

4.  A review of the available records as well as the Vietnam Casualty listing fails to show that the applicant was wounded, that he was treated for wounds or that he was reported as a casualty.  However, the available records do show that the applicant was awarded (subsequent to his REFRAD) an individual award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star that was not added to his DD Form 214.

5.  Additionally, the applicant’s records show that he participated in five campaigns in Vietnam instead of the one campaign indicated on his DD Form 214 and thus is authorized one silver service star for wear on his VSM instead on one bronze service star.  He also was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Action Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation.        

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a result of hostile action, that the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.  This regulation also provides that there are no time limitations on requests for award of the Purple Heart.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the Board does not doubt the veracity of the applicant’s claim to have sustained injuries and wounds while serving in Vietnam, there is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not provide any evidence to corroborate his claim.  Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action, and that he was treated for wounds incurred as a result of hostile action which was made a matter of official record, there is no basis to grant award of the Purple Heart to the applicant in this case.  

2.  However, the available records do show that he is entitled to have awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation and one silver service star for wear on his VSM in lieu of the one bronze service star currently reflected on his DD Form 214.  

3.  Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.  Therefore, administrative correction of the applicant’s records will be accomplished by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined by the Board in paragraph 2 of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.

4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 28 December 1970; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 
27 December 1973.  The applicant did not file within the three-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X ___  __X__  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board determined that administrative error in the records of the individual should be corrected.  Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation and one silver service star for wear on his VSM in lieu of the one bronze service star currently reflected on his DD Form 214. 




______X________
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060010813
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20070227
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(DENY w/note)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.107.0015
61/ph
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014533

    Original file (20060014533.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. A review of his official records shows no record of the applicant being awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant’s contention that he was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart has been noted; however, the applicant has not provided orders to show two awards of the Purple Heart and the evidence of record contains evidence of only one incident of his being wounded.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087226C070212

    Original file (2003087226C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart; however, an administrative oversight at the time of separation resulted in one award being omitted from his DD Form 214. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 21 March 1967 through 11 January 1970. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083623C070212

    Original file (2003083623C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the available records fails to show any indication that the applicant was wounded or that he was recommended for award of the Purple Heart. The applicant participated in six campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. Although the standard evidentiary documentation required for awarding the Purple Heart is not present in this case, the Board finds that the statements submitted by three former members of the applicant's unit at the time, of which one was the first sergeant at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007102

    Original file (20090007102.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was wounded in action in Vietnam on 15 September 1968. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, Bronze Star Medal (BSM), National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080677C070215

    Original file (2002080677C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect his second award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device, that he be issued the second award of the BSM and that he be awarded the Purple Heart. Accordingly, the Board finds that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for his injury on 23 February 1969. b. by correcting his records to show that he was awarded the BSM with "V" Device and issuing him a "V" Device for wear on his already awarded BSM; and

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002544

    Original file (20080002544.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the records of her deceased father, a former service member (FSM) be corrected to reflect his multiple awards of the Purple Heart and all other awards to which he is entitled. His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Army Commendation Medal and the Bronze Star Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019355

    Original file (20090019355.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was wounded in action in Cambodia in June 1970 and received the Purple Heart; however, it was not reflected on his records at the time of his release from active duty. However, there is no evidence in the available records to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding of the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star Medal with one oak leaf cluster,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000307C070205

    Original file (20060000307C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    John Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant sustained shrapnel wounds in Vietnam and that he was treated by medical personnel at the time; however, it appears that an administrative oversight resulted in his not being awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080587C070215

    Original file (2002080587C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he believes that he should have been awarded the Purple Heart for a wound he received in Vietnam when a piece of shrapnel hit him in the inner left thigh. The Board finds that there is sufficient evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was in fact wounded in Vietnam and should have been awarded the Purple Heart for his wound. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078526C070215

    Original file (2002078526C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the evidence of record has failed to show that the applicant was wounded in action against the enemy and that the treatment of his wound was made a matter of record, the statement from the company commander at the time, as well as records from the National Archives to corroborate the attack, is sufficiently convincing enough to show that he was in fact wounded on 11 January 1969 and that the failure to record the treatment and award him the Purple Heart was the result of...