RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 15 April 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080001315
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Director
Analyst
The following members, a quorum, were present:
M
Chairperson
M
Member
M
Member
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that at one time he had orders awarding him the Purple Heart for his actions in Vietnam on 27 February 1968 and he thought the award was on his DD Form 214; however, he has recently discovered that it is not and he desires it to be added at this time.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and a copy of an order awarding him the Bronze Star Medal with V Device that indicates that he was wounded in the engagement on 27 February 1968.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in Richmond, Virginia on 8 February 1960 for a period of 3 years under the airborne enlistment option. He completed his training as a light weapons infantryman and airborne training and he remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments. He served an overseas tour in Germany, the Dominican Republic, Alaska, and two tours in Vietnam from 7 April 1967 to 22 April 1968 and from 3 July 1969 to 13 July 1970.
3. On 31 August 1984, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) and was transferred to the Retired List in the pay grade of E-8, effective 1 September 1984. He had served 24 years, 6 months, and 23 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD indicates that he was awarded the Army Service Ribbon, the Overseas Service Ribbon, the National Defense Service Medal, the Master Parachutist Badge, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Army Commendation Medal with one oak leaf cluster and V Device, the Bronze Star Medal with two oak leaf clusters and V Device, the Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon, and the Good Conduct Medal (8th award).
4. A review of the applicants official records fails to show any indication that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart. His name is also not contained on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. However, his record does show that he was a patient in the 249th General Hospital in Japan on 15 March 1968 and that he was medically evacuated to Dewitt Army Hospital at Fort Belvoir, Virginia on 27 April 1968.
5. His record also shows that during his first tour in Vietnam he was assigned to the 503rd Infantry Regiment and during his second tour in Vietnam he was assigned to Company C, 75th Ranger Battalion.
6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
7. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicants unit was subsequently awarded the Valorous Unit Award (VUA), the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC), and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation during the periods he was assigned to the units. Additionally, he participated in nine campaigns while assigned to Vietnam and is entitled to be awarded one silver and four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded VSM.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although there are no orders in the available record showing that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart, there is sufficient evidence to establish that he was wounded in action against the enemy on 27 February 1968 and that he was subsequently hospitalized. Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that he was in fact awarded the Purple Heart and that the orders were never filed in his official record. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to add the award of the Purple Heart to his record at this time.
2. The evidence of record also establishes that the applicant is entitled to awards of the VUA, the PUC, the MUC, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation, and one silver and four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded VSM to denote his campaign participation in Vietnam.
BOARD VOTE:
__PHM __ __KSJ__ __JGH__ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart and by awarding him the VUA, the PUC, the MUC, the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation, and one silver and four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded VSM.
2. The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.
___ PHM ___
CHAIRPERSON
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080001315
4
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA 22202-4508
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019824
There is no evidence in the available records to show that the FSM was ever awarded more than one Purple Heart. A review of the FSM's official records shows that in addition to the awards listed on his DD Form 214 at the time of his retirement, he was also awarded the CIB, the Purple Heart, the Korean Service Medal (KSM), the United Nations Service Medal (UNSM), the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp, and the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) with one oak leaf cluster. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000683
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect that the last four digits of his social security number (SSN) is 5456 and that he was awarded the Silver Star. The applicant states that the last four digits of his SSN on his DD Form 214 are incorrect and that his award of the Silver Star is not reflected on that form. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005185C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to reflect awards of four bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal (RVNCAHM) Unit Citation, the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Automatic Rifle and M-16 Rifle bars, the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), the Valorous Unit Award (VUA) and any other awards and decorations to which he is entitled. On 2 May...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003459C070206
The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the GCMDL. The applicant has failed to show through evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record, sufficient evidence to establish his entitlement to the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002544
The applicant requests that the records of her deceased father, a former service member (FSM) be corrected to reflect his multiple awards of the Purple Heart and all other awards to which he is entitled. His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Army Commendation Medal and the Bronze Star Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003376C070206
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his awards of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and Purple Heart. This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the RVNCM and by showing that he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004435C070206
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 29 June 1966 through 10 May 1968. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him four bronze service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015901
The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM with V Device for heroism in the RVN on 9 May 1968 and this award was announced and authorized in GOs issued by the 199th Infantry Brigade, as evidenced by an entry in item 41 of his DA Form 20. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080933C070215
He further states that his commander recommended him for the Silver Star and he should have also received the Purple Heart for his wounds. Army Regulation 15-185, the regulation under which this Board operates, states that the Board will not consider any application if it determines that the applicant has not exhausted all administrative remedies available to them. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077114C070215
The Soldier’s Medal is awarded to any person of the Armed Forces of the United States or of a friendly foreign nation who, while serving in any capacity with the Army of the United states, distinguished himself or herself by heroism not involving actual conflict with the enemy. The evidence of record fails to show that the applicant was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action. Additionally, there is no evidence that the applicant was recommended for an award of the Soldier’s Medal...