Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002287C070206
Original file (20050002287C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        6 October 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050002287


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Curtis L. Greenway            |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Richard T. Dunbar             |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. LaVerne V. Berry              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC)
debt be waived.

2.  The applicant states he received a 2-year scholarship with the
provision of serving at least 1 year of active duty military service for
each year of financial support.  He has now been serving honorably as an
active duty U. S. Air Force officer for more than 4 years, thus fulfilling
his requirement towards the scholarship contract.

3.  The applicant provides a proof-of-service letter, an undated letter
from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), and an Account
Statement dated 3 April 2000.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant apparently enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR)
(ROTC Control Group) around the fall of 1996 and enrolled as an ROTC
scholarship cadet effective around the same time.  His DA Form 597-3 (Army
Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract), is not available.  Paragraph 7d
would have stated if he were disenrolled from the ROTC Program for any
reason or if he failed to accept a commission, the Secretary of the Army
could order him to active duty as an enlisted Soldier or, in lieu of being
ordered to active duty, could require him to reimburse the United States
through repayment of an amount of money, plus interest, equal to the entire
amount of financial assistance paid by the United States for his advanced
education.

2.  Paragraph 12 of the applicant’s DA Form 597-3 would have stated he
understood and agreed if he voluntarily or because of misconduct failed to
begin or failed to complete any period of active duty he may have incurred
under the contract, he would be required to reimburse the United States an
amount of money, plus interest, that is equal to or bore the same ratio to
the total cost of the financial assistance provided him as the unserved
portion of such duty bore to the total period of such duty he was obligated
to serve.

3.  On an unknown date, the applicant was dismissed from Advanced Camp for
failing the Army Physical Fitness Test.

4.  By letter dated 5 March 1999, the applicant was notified he was in
breach of his scholarship contract based on his dismissal from Advanced
Camp and failing the Army Physical Fitness Test.  He was notified the Army
had the right to order him to active duty as a Private, E-1 to fulfill his
contractual obligations; however, he was given the opportunity to repay the
cost of the scholarship financial assistance he had received (in the amount
of $26,575.00) in lieu of being ordered to active duty.  He could repay the
debt in full or elect to initiate a repayment plan.  He failed to respond
to the notification letter.

5.  On 19 March 1999, the applicant completed an Air Force Reserve Officer
Training Corps Contract for a 1-year scholarship.  The contract indicated
he would be commissioned in May 2000.

6.  As of 3 April 2000, the applicant's Army ROTC debt was $27,893.64.

7.  The applicant was commissioned a second lieutenant in the U. S. Air
Force on or about 29 September 2000 and entered active duty on 15 October
2000.  As of September 2005, he was still on active duty with the U. S. Air
Force.

8.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from
the      U. S. Army Cadet Command.  The advisory opinion noted the terms of
the scholarship contract required a cadet to either repay the debt
monetarily or agree to be ordered to active duty through ROTC channels
based on the needs of the Army.  The applicant was offered those options
but did not return the choice of options and instead "chose active duty
through an Air Force recruiter."  His decision to breach the terms of his
ROTC contract was a voluntary action.  His service in the Air Force is not
an authorized remedy for debt repayment under the terms of the ROTC
contract.  The U. S. Army Cadet Command recommended disapproval of the
applicant's request.

9.  A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for
comment or rebuttal.  He stated that at the time he did not differentiate
between the different branches of the Department of Defense because he did
not know anything about the Department of Defense structure.  Army ROTC was
the only military program that had real visibility on campus and he
naturally approached that office with the desire to enter active duty.  As
he became more knowledgeable, he came to realize he would be far more
valuable to his country as an aviator in the U. S. Air Force than in the
Army.  He provided a letter of support from his commander.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence of Government error or injustice in this case.
The applicant was properly disenrolled from ROTC for failing the Army
Physical Fitness Test and being dismissed from Advanced Camp.

2.  However, the applicant's September 2000 appointment as a second
lieutenant in the U. S. Air Force and his service on active duty serves the
same purpose as his successful completion of Army ROTC would have done.
The Department of Defense is still getting the benefits of his service,
albeit in a different service.  As a matter of equity it would be
appropriate to consider his September 2000 appointment as a commissioned
officer in the U. S. Air Force to have met the military service obligation
required by his Army ROTC scholarship contract.

BOARD VOTE:

__clg___  __rtd___     __lvb___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
showing he completed a DA Form 597-3 on 1 September 1996 and it showed that
he would satisfy the service obligation under the original terms of the
ROTC contract as a U. S. Air Force officer, thereby negating any
requirement to recoup the cost of his Army ROTC scholarship.




                                  __Curtis L. Greenway__
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050002287                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051006                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.       |128.10                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100455C070208

    Original file (2004100455C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Instead of suspending the debt until he came off active duty and counting his active time against his debt, they have been taking two-thirds of his active duty pay since August 2003. If the applicant fails to complete a 3-year period of active duty obligated as a result of his ROTC scholarship either voluntarily, because of misconduct, or because he is released from active duty before completing 3 years of active duty, his ROTC debt would be required to be recouped on a pro-rated basis. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010515C070208

    Original file (20040010515C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He rebutted that he was aware the terms presented to him for repayment were either immediate repayment or enlistment (emphasis added) into the Regular Army at the time of disenrollment from ROTC. When he was disenrolled, his disenrollment letter gave him three options, one of which was to request to be ordered to active duty. Instead, he enlisted in the Regular Army in May 2004 in pay grade E-4 and for two bonus options ($20,000 for the Cash Bonus alone) and for the Loan Repayment Program...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010508C070208

    Original file (20040010508C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    That command stated that the applicant voluntarily breached the terms of her ROTC contract, and also voluntarily enlisted in the Army; however, her voluntary enlisted service in the Army was not an authorized remedy for debt repayment. If the applicant had chosen to enter active duty or been involuntarily ordered to active duty at the time she failed to continue her enrollment in the ROTC, she would have been assigned according to the needs of the Army and would not have had the opportunity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088147C070403

    Original file (2003088147C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that as part of a scholarship enlistment in the ROTC, the applicant, on 9 November 1998, signed a DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship Cadet Contract), which is an agreement between the Army and a potential ROTC cadet. Paragraph 7d states that if the cadet were disenrolled from the ROTC Program for any reason, the Secretary of the Army could order the cadet to reimburse the United States the dollar amount plus...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003500C070205

    Original file (20060003500C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Dennis Phillips | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The opinion stated that the terms of the scholarship contract required that a cadet repay the debt monetarily or agree to be ordered to active duty through ROTC channels based on the needs of the Army. The opinion stated that the applicant’s decision to breach the terms of his ROTC contract and his enlistment in the National Guard were voluntary actions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062178C070421

    Original file (2001062178C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    As a matter of equity it would be appropriate to consider his enlistment in the Regular Army to have met the active duty obligation required by his ROTC scholarship contract. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the applicant’s ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the service obligation under the original terms of the ROTC contract by enlisting in the Regular Army. If the applicant fails to complete the period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062761C070421

    Original file (2001062761C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his ROTC debt should be terminated due to the terms of the contract stating that if he completed 3 years of active duty in the U. S. Army his balance would be $0.00. Paragraph 8 of the applicant’s DA Form 597-3 states that if he were called to active duty for breach of contract under the provisions of paragraph 7, he would be ordered to active duty for one of the periods listed, based upon the year during which the breach occurs: Military Science II, 2 years;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004527

    Original file (20110004527.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 9 of his DA Form 597-3 states that if the cadet were disenrolled from the ROTC program for any reason or if he failed to accept a commission if offered he may, at the discretion of the Army, be directed, in lieu of being ordered to active duty as a private (E-1) for a period as specified in paragraph 8, to reimburse the U.S. through repayment of an amount of money, plus interest, equal to the entire amount of financial assistance paid by the U.S. for his advanced education from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067945C070402

    Original file (2002067945C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In lieu of repayment, the cadet could be ordered to active duty for not more than four years. Had the applicant not had a service or repayment obligation, based on the ROTC program requirements, he would have been entitled to all of the enlistment incentives he received including the $13,000 cash bonus. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by: a. amending the applicant’s ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070259C070402

    Original file (2002070259C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 17 November 1999, the applicant waived his right to a hearing and declined expeditious call to active duty. More than one year passed between the time he agreed to repay the ROTC scholarship benefits and his enlistment in the Regular Army. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the applicant’s ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the service obligation under the original terms of the ROTC contract as a Regular Army...