| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Nancy L. Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Luther L. Santiful | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Paula Mokulis | Member | ||
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) debt be forgiven.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he has returned to active duty as required by his ROTC contract.
4. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 October 1996 for 4 years. On 27 July 1999, he was released from active duty, in pay grade E-4, for the purpose of attending ROTC. On 28 July 1999, he enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (ROTC Control Group). His Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract, DA Form 597-3, paragraph 2h states that if he was discharged from the active Army to become a scholarship recipient that he could not voluntarily withdraw from the scholarship program after the first day of class without incurring an active duty and reimbursement obligation under this contract. If he was a freshman in the basic course and was disenrolled from the ROTC Program for any reason, he would be ordered to active duty for the time not served on his original active duty enlistment when he was separated to accept the ROTC scholarship provided at least one year remained on his original active duty enlistment contract and he was otherwise eligible for active duty.
5. Paragraph 12 of the applicant’s DA Form 597-3 states that if the cadet was disenrolled from the ROTC Program for any reason, the Secretary of the Army could order the cadet to reimburse the United States the dollar amount plus interest that bears the same ratio to the total cost of the scholarship financial assistance provided by the United States to the cadet as the unserved portion of active duty bears to the total period of active duty the cadet agreed to serve or was ordered to serve.
6. Paragraph 12 of the applicant’s DA Form 597-3 states that he understood and agreed that if he voluntarily or because of misconduct failed to begin or failed to complete any period of active duty that he may have incurred under the contract, he would be required to reimburse the United States an amount of money, plus interest, that bore the same ratio to the total cost of the financial assistance provided him as the unserved portion of such duty bore to the total period of such duty he was obligated to serve.
7. On 13 October 1999, the applicant requested permission to officially withdraw from his college due to personal and financial reasons. He acknowledged that withdrawal from the college could affect his ROTC benefits. An adjusted total of $5,763.30 in ROTC scholarship benefits was paid on his behalf in November 1999. On 3 November 1999, disenrollment action was initiated. On 17 November 1999, the applicant waived his right to a hearing and declined expeditious call to active duty. On 9 May 2000, he was disenrolled from ROTC. On 15 May 2000, he elected to repay the total ROTC scholarship benefit owed $5,763.30, in monthly installments.
8. On 31 October 2001, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years in pay grade E-4 for enlistment option assignment of choice.
9. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-1. That office opined that the applicant was disenrolled from ROTC for breach of contract, he was offered the option of expeditious call to active duty or repaying the amount owed and he elected to repay the debt in monthly installments. The debt was established at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and the applicant’s only recourse was this Board.
10. A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment or rebuttal. He did not respond within the given time frame.
11. Records at DFAS – Denver Center show the applicant has made a few payments of the interest only on this debt.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant had 1 year, 2 months, and 11 days remaining on his original enlistment contract when he was discharged to attend ROTC in July 1999. Although not provided for in his DA Form 597-3, his 31 October 2001 enlistment in the Regular Army served the same purpose as would have been served had he been ordered to active duty to complete his remaining obligation.
2. More than two years passed between the applicant’s request from withdrawal from the college and his enlistment in the Regular Army. More than one year passed between the time he agreed to repay the ROTC scholarship benefits and his enlistment in the Regular Army. Records at DFAS show he paid only some of the interest on this debt and none of the principal as he agreed to do. This was a valid debt and any payment made on it to the date of this Board action will not be refunded.
3. If the applicant fails to complete the period of enlisted service obligated as a result of his ROTC scholarship either voluntarily or because of misconduct, his ROTC debt would be required to be recouped on a pro-rated basis.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the applicant’s ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the service obligation under the original terms of the ROTC contract as a Regular Army enlisted soldier as a result of his 31 October 2001 enlistment.
2. If the applicant fails to complete the period of enlisted service obligated as a result of his amended ROTC scholarship contract either voluntarily or because of misconduct, his ROTC debt would be required to be recouped on a pro-rated basis in accordance with paragraph 12 of his DA Form 597-3.
3. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
___LLS__ __PM___ __DPH__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Luther L. Santiful _
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002070259 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/08/06 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | PARTIAL GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 128.100 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004141C070206
Jeannette McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states the debt was incurred from one year of an Army ROTC contract. That office noted the applicant's contract required her either to repay the debt monetarily or agree to be ordered to active duty through ROTC channels based on the needs of the Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067945C070402
In lieu of repayment, the cadet could be ordered to active duty for not more than four years. Had the applicant not had a service or repayment obligation, based on the ROTC program requirements, he would have been entitled to all of the enlistment incentives he received including the $13,000 cash bonus. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by: a. amending the applicant’s ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071051C070402
If the applicant had chosen to enter active duty or been involuntarily ordered to active duty, at the time he failed to continue his enrollment in the ROTC, he would have been assigned according to the needs of the Army and would not have had the opportunity to choose his training nor to receive the enlistment bonus. The applicant's ROTC contract states that if he disenrolled from the program he would be obligated to serve for a specific period on active duty or to repay the amount of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010508C070208
That command stated that the applicant voluntarily breached the terms of her ROTC contract, and also voluntarily enlisted in the Army; however, her voluntary enlisted service in the Army was not an authorized remedy for debt repayment. If the applicant had chosen to enter active duty or been involuntarily ordered to active duty at the time she failed to continue her enrollment in the ROTC, she would have been assigned according to the needs of the Army and would not have had the opportunity...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100455C070208
Instead of suspending the debt until he came off active duty and counting his active time against his debt, they have been taking two-thirds of his active duty pay since August 2003. If the applicant fails to complete a 3-year period of active duty obligated as a result of his ROTC scholarship either voluntarily, because of misconduct, or because he is released from active duty before completing 3 years of active duty, his ROTC debt would be required to be recouped on a pro-rated basis. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085920C070212
The applicant’s military records show that as part of a scholarship enlistment in the ROTC, the applicant, on 31 August 1992, signed a DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship Cadet Contract), which is an agreement between the Army and a potential ROTC cadet. d. Paragraph 12 requires acknowledgement that the cadet understood and agreed that if they voluntarily or because of misconduct fail to begin or fail to complete any period of active duty that they...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006695
The applicant provides his ROTC contract; an addendum to his ROTC contract; his RA enlistment contract; his Regular Army Data Report; a copy of the durable power of attorney; and the following supporting documents with this application: a. a copy of the applicant's United States Army Advanced Education Financial Assistance Record showing the applicant's education debt totals $38,600.69; b. a 22 June 2006 letter from the ROTC Battalion Commander initiating disenrollment action against him...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062761C070421
The applicant states that his ROTC debt should be terminated due to the terms of the contract stating that if he completed 3 years of active duty in the U. S. Army his balance would be $0.00. Paragraph 8 of the applicant’s DA Form 597-3 states that if he were called to active duty for breach of contract under the provisions of paragraph 7, he would be ordered to active duty for one of the periods listed, based upon the year during which the breach occurs: Military Science II, 2 years;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010515C070208
He rebutted that he was aware the terms presented to him for repayment were either immediate repayment or enlistment (emphasis added) into the Regular Army at the time of disenrollment from ROTC. When he was disenrolled, his disenrollment letter gave him three options, one of which was to request to be ordered to active duty. Instead, he enlisted in the Regular Army in May 2004 in pay grade E-4 and for two bonus options ($20,000 for the Cash Bonus alone) and for the Loan Repayment Program...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076953C070215
The cadet command indicates that the applicant breached his contract in his third year, which would have resulted in a three-year period of obligated service. The Director of Personnel and Administration recommended that the applicant's service in the Marine Corps be accepted as satisfying his ROTC debt. Nevertheless, the Board considers that the Nation has received just benefit by the applicant's active Federal service in the Marine Corps and concludes justice would be served by allowing...