Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062178C070421
Original file (2001062178C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 15 November 2001
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001062178


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Irene N. Wheelwright Chairperson
Mr. Stanley Kelley Member
Ms. Karen A. Heinz Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests in effect, that his current active duty commitment and service be accepted in lieu of repayment of his Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) debt.

3. The applicant makes no additional statement.

4. The applicant enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (ROTC Control Group) around September 1997. His Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract, DA Form 597-3, paragraph 7d states that if the cadet were disenrolled from the ROTC Program for any reason, the Secretary of the Army could order the cadet to reimburse the United States the dollar amount plus interest that bears the same ratio to the total cost of the scholarship financial assistance provided by the United States to the cadet as the unserved portion of active duty bears to the total period of active duty the cadet agreed to serve or was ordered to serve. In lieu or repayment, the cadet could be ordered to active duty for not more than four years.

5. Paragraph 8 of the applicant’s DA Form 597-3 states that if he were called to active duty for breach of contract under the provisions of paragraph 7, he would be ordered to active duty for one of the periods listed, based upon the year during which the breach occurs: Military Science II, 2 years; Military Science III, 3 years; Military Science IV, 4 years.

6. Paragraph 12 of the applicant’s DA Form 597-3 states that he understood and agreed that if he voluntarily or because of misconduct failed to begin or failed to complete any period of active duty that he may have incurred under the contract, he would be required to reimburse the United States an amount of money, plus interest, that bore the same ratio to the total cost of the financial assistance provided him as the unserved portion of such duty bore to the total period of such duty he was obligated to serve.

7. Paragraph 21 of the applicant’s DA For 597-3 states that the Department of the Army agreed to pay for a period of 3 academic years tuition and educational fees up to an annual amount of $16,000.00.

8. On 6 September 2000, the U. S. Army Cadet Command informed the applicant that he was disenrolled from ROTC based on undesirable character as evidenced by discreditable incidents with civil authorities. (Evidence in his Regular Army enlistment contract indicates he was removed from ROTC for a driving while under the influence incident.)


9. US Army Advanced Education Financial Assistance Record, DA Form 5315-E, shows that as of 1 August 2000, $33,739.00 Army ROTC scholarship benefits were paid to the applicant.

10. On 12 June 2001, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-4, for enlistment options training in military occupational specialty 92R (Parachute Rigger), airborne training, and $16,000.00 cash bonus, for 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. Although not provided for in his DA Form 597-3, the applicant’s 12 June 2001 enlistment in the Regular Army serves the same purpose as would have been served had he been ordered to active duty in the U. S. Army. The Department of the Army is still getting the benefits of his service for a period of 4 years. As a matter of equity it would be appropriate to consider his enlistment in the Regular Army to have met the active duty obligation required by his ROTC scholarship contract.

2. If the applicant fails to complete the period of enlisted service obligated as a result of his ROTC scholarship either voluntarily or because of misconduct, his ROTC debt would be required to be recouped on a pro-rated basis.

3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the applicant’s ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the service obligation under the original terms of the ROTC contract by enlisting in the Regular Army.

2. If the applicant fails to complete the period of enlisted service obligated as a result of his amended ROTC scholarship contract either voluntarily or because of misconduct, his ROTC debt would be required to be recouped on a pro-rated basis in accordance with paragraph 12 of his DA Form 597-3.


3. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

__inw___ __sk____ __kah___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION



                           Irene N. Wheelwright
                  ______________________
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2001062178
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20011115
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 128.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062761C070421

    Original file (2001062761C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his ROTC debt should be terminated due to the terms of the contract stating that if he completed 3 years of active duty in the U. S. Army his balance would be $0.00. Paragraph 8 of the applicant’s DA Form 597-3 states that if he were called to active duty for breach of contract under the provisions of paragraph 7, he would be ordered to active duty for one of the periods listed, based upon the year during which the breach occurs: Military Science II, 2 years;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088147C070403

    Original file (2003088147C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that as part of a scholarship enlistment in the ROTC, the applicant, on 9 November 1998, signed a DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship Cadet Contract), which is an agreement between the Army and a potential ROTC cadet. Paragraph 7d states that if the cadet were disenrolled from the ROTC Program for any reason, the Secretary of the Army could order the cadet to reimburse the United States the dollar amount plus...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018940

    Original file (20080018940.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As stated in the previous Record of Proceedings, the applicant's DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract) is not available. On 20 August 2005, the applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army for appointment as a commissioned or warrant officer. The applicant's contention that his service as an officer in the Regular Army should fulfill his obligation under his breached ROTC contract was considered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076953C070215

    Original file (2002076953C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The cadet command indicates that the applicant breached his contract in his third year, which would have resulted in a three-year period of obligated service. The Director of Personnel and Administration recommended that the applicant's service in the Marine Corps be accepted as satisfying his ROTC debt. Nevertheless, the Board considers that the Nation has received just benefit by the applicant's active Federal service in the Marine Corps and concludes justice would be served by allowing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006695

    Original file (20070006695.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his ROTC contract; an addendum to his ROTC contract; his RA enlistment contract; his Regular Army Data Report; a copy of the durable power of attorney; and the following supporting documents with this application: a. a copy of the applicant's United States Army Advanced Education Financial Assistance Record showing the applicant's education debt totals $38,600.69; b. a 22 June 2006 letter from the ROTC Battalion Commander initiating disenrollment action against him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010508C070208

    Original file (20040010508C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    That command stated that the applicant voluntarily breached the terms of her ROTC contract, and also voluntarily enlisted in the Army; however, her voluntary enlisted service in the Army was not an authorized remedy for debt repayment. If the applicant had chosen to enter active duty or been involuntarily ordered to active duty at the time she failed to continue her enrollment in the ROTC, she would have been assigned according to the needs of the Army and would not have had the opportunity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067945C070402

    Original file (2002067945C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In lieu of repayment, the cadet could be ordered to active duty for not more than four years. Had the applicant not had a service or repayment obligation, based on the ROTC program requirements, he would have been entitled to all of the enlistment incentives he received including the $13,000 cash bonus. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by: a. amending the applicant’s ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011743

    Original file (20080011743.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant has not contended that he was unaware of the conditions of his contract, the evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant understood the conditions of his ROTC contract, whereas he could elect to repay his scholarship debt in lieu of being involuntarily ordered to active duty in the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1 for a period not to exceed 4 years in the Army. If the applicant fails to complete the period of enlisted service he would have been obligated as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007220

    Original file (20150007220.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests suspension of the debt he incurred after he was disenrolled from the Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Program while he completes his active duty service obligation. His enlistment contract and/or DA Form 3286 (Regular Army Statement of Understanding) do not show he was granted an enlistment bonus. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending his ROTC Program scholarship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071051C070402

    Original file (2002071051C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the applicant had chosen to enter active duty or been involuntarily ordered to active duty, at the time he failed to continue his enrollment in the ROTC, he would have been assigned according to the needs of the Army and would not have had the opportunity to choose his training nor to receive the enlistment bonus. The applicant's ROTC contract states that if he disenrolled from the program he would be obligated to serve for a specific period on active duty or to repay the amount of...