RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 21 July 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001733
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. John Infante | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Robert J. Osborn | |Member |
| |Ms. Brenda K. Koch | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. In effect, the applicant requests that all of his Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related
Special Compensation (CRSC).
2. The applicant states that he links all of his disabilities to the
wounds he received in combat in Germany in 1945.
3. The applicant provides the denial of his CRSC application and his
separation document.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section
1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, states that eligible
members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay
computation (or 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at
age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed
conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that
simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. Such disabilities
must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10% disabling. For
periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members
had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart
and are rated at least 10% disabled or who are rated at least 60% disabled
as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training
exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war. CRSC
benefits are equal to the amount of VA disability compensation offset from
retired pay based on those disabilities determined to be combat-related.
2. On 22 December 2004, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA)
Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch determined that the
applicant’s thigh muscle injury, forearm muscle injury, migraine headaches,
and flat foot condition were not combat related and denied his request for
CRSC.
3. In the processing of similar cases, advisory opinions were obtained
from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD), Military
Personnel Policy. The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order
for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of
the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation
of war.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The CRSC criteria is specifically for those military retirees who have
combat related disabilities. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of
operations is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree
CRSC. The military retiree must show that the disability was incurred
while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat
conditions, or while performing specially hazardous duties such as
parachuting or scuba diving.
2. While the applicant argues that he sustained his disabilities while in
combat in Germany in 1945, he has not submitted any evidence that any of
his VA rated disabilities were incurred while he was engaged in combat.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___bkk __ ___ji____ ____rjo__ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.
_________John Infante_____________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20050001733 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON |YYYYMMDD |
|DATE BOARDED |20050721 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |YYYYMMDD |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR . . . . . |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. | |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001733C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 July 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001733 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In effect, the applicant requests that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). While the applicant argues that he sustained his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002738C070206
James B. Gunlicks | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous duties), are eligible for CRSC. As stated above, the CRSC criteria is specifically for those...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009839C070206
Qawiy A. Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In effect, the applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities for hearing loss and tinnitus be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003512C070206
Carmen Duncan | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 21 January 2005, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch determined that the applicant’s lower leg muscle injury and knee condition were combat related and awarded him CRSC for those two VA ratings. The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be considered combat...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001536C070206
The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application, his VA rating decision and excerpts from his military records. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous duties), are eligible for CRSC. The applicant has not submitted any evidence which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001536C070206
Laverne V. Berry | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous duties), are eligible for CRSC. The applicant has not submitted any evidence which would show that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002049C070206
Laverne V. Berry | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application, and excerpts from his military records and VA medical records. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002742C070206
Laverne V. Berry | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011330C070206
Jeanette B. McPherson | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application, and VA medical records. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010856
The applicant requests, in effect, that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicants VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to...