Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002738C070206
Original file (20050002738C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:          28 July 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050002738


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti            |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. William D. Powers             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Larry C. Bergquist            |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. James B. Gunlicks             |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that all of his Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA) rated disability for spinal disc condition be approved for Combat-
Related Special Compensation (CRSC).

2.  The applicant states that his spinal disc condition occurred on the
flight line during preflight for a mission when he was assigned to a unit
in Germany.  The unit was designated a combat unit and had conducted
numerous combat maneuvers in Europe and the Mediterranean.  His unit also
participated regularly in live fire missions in Europe.  He adds that he
also flew helicopters during a tour in Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides the denial of his CRSC application in support of
his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC), as established by Section
1413a, Title 10, United States Code, as amended, states that eligible
members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay
computation (or 20 years of service creditable for reserve retirement at
age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed
conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that
simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Such disabilities
must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10% disabling.  For
periods before 1 January 2004 (the date this statute was amended), members
had to have disabilities for which they have been awarded the Purple Heart
and are rated at least 10% disabled or who are rated at least 60% disabled
as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training
exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  CRSC
benefits are equal to the amount of VA disability compensation offset from
retired pay based on those disabilities determined to be combat-related.

2.  Concurrent Retirement and Disability Payment (CRDP), as established by
the Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA),
provides a 10-year phase-out of the offset to military retired pay due to
receipt of VA disability compensation for members whose combined disability
rating is 50% or greater.

3.  In the processing of similar cases, advisory opinions were obtained
from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD), Military
Personnel Policy.  The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order
for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of
the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation
of war.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  CRSC was passed into law as the first stage of an ongoing legislative
initiative to eliminate the prohibition of military retirees from receiving
VA disability benefits.  Due to cost constraints, while all military
retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability
compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred
in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous
duties), are eligible for CRSC.

2.  As stated above, the CRSC criteria is specifically for those military
retirees who have combat related disabilities.  Incurring disabilities
while in a theater of operations is not, in and of itself, sufficient to
grant a military retiree CRSC.  The military retiree must show that the
disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties
simulating combat conditions, or while performing specially hazardous
duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.

3.  While the applicant states that his back started hurting while he was
on the flight line, he does not state that he injured his back at that
time.  In addition, there is no indication that the applicant was
participating in a direct simulation of war at that time, such as an
airmobile assault, a beach landing, or an infiltration course.

4.  The denial of the applicant’s request does not mean he will not be
compensated for his service related disabilities.  The denial means that he
will not be compensated for his disabilities in the first group of military
retirees being given this compensation.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___lcb___  ___wdp _  ____jbg__  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.





            _________William D. Powers_________
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050002738                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050728                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |






-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002049C070206

    Original file (20050002049C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Laverne V. Berry | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application, and excerpts from his military records and VA medical records. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003005C070206

    Original file (20050003005C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Kenneth W. Lapin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous duties), are eligible for CRSC. However, medical records must establish that a military retiree was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001736C070206

    Original file (20050001736C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the denial of his request for reconsideration of his CRSC application, his VA disability ratings, and excerpts from his military records. The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees who are rated 50 percent or more disabled by the VA will...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001736C070206

    Original file (20050001736C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for condition of the nervous system be approved for Combat- Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The applicant provides the denial of his request for reconsideration of his CRSC application, his VA disability ratings, and excerpts from his military records. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees who are rated 50 percent or more disabled by the VA will eventually receive concurrent receipt of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002005C070206

    Original file (20050002005C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jeanette R. McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for spinal disc disorder be considered as being incurred while simulating war and, as a result, that he be approved for Combat- Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be considered combat related,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002123C070206

    Original file (20050002123C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the denial of her request to reconsider her CRSC application, her VA disability decision and rating, excerpts from her military medical records, and her separation documents. The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002759C070206

    Original file (20050002759C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the denial of his CRSC application, the denial of his request for reconsideration of his CRSC application, VA and military medical records, excerpts from his military records, after action reports from his unit in Vietnam, and his separation document. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001772 C070206

    Original file (20050001772 C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 10 January 2005, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch denied the applicant’s request for CRSC. While the applicant states that he hurt his back during a mortar attack, he has not submitted any evidence to substantiate his contention.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001772 C070206

    Original file (20050001772 C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 January 2005, the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch denied the applicant’s request for CRSC. Due to cost constraints, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous duties), are eligible for CRSC. While the applicant states that he hurt his back during a mortar attack, he has not submitted any evidence to substantiate his contention.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003826C070205

    Original file (20060003826C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ronald D. Gant | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities for tinnitus and spinal disc condition be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to...