Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001343C070206
Original file (20050001343C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            04 OCTOBER 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR20050001343


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Ronald DeNoia                 |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Mark Manning                  |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Larry Bergquist               |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Carmen Duncan                 |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his medical records be changed to show that
he injured his left knee instead of his right knee.

2.  The applicant states that it was his left knee that was injured and "he
should know what knee it was".

3.  The applicant provides a Department of Veterans' Services letter, a
doctor's letter, two SF 519A (Radiographic Report), and an SF 89 (Report of
Medical History).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 13 May 1955.  The application submitted in this case is dated
18 January 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant indicated on his SF 89 that he injured his knee while
playing softball on 12 June 1954 in Landstuhl, Germany.

4.  The letter from the Department of Veterans' Services is dated 18
January 2005 and states that the applicant's "right knee was not fractured,
it was his left knee".

5.  The letter from the doctor states that the applicant is his patient and
"he has been seen for left knee pain, which is the result of a service
related injury".  This letter is dated 21 October 2002.

6.  The radiographic reports submitted by the applicant are dated 15 June
1954 and 8 July 1954.  These reports show that the applicant's right knee
was treated for fracture of the patella.

7.  The applicant's records contain another Radiographic Report, dated 22
July 1954.  This report refers to the applicant's right patella fracture.

8.  The applicant's records contain two DA Forms 8-24 (Unnamed Form).
These forms are stamped "Outpatient Service, US Army Hospital Landstuhl,
Germany". The first form is dated 15 June 1954.  It contains the
handwritten notes: "Had a sore right knee for about 2 weeks.  Last night
hurt knee playing ball.  X-ray right knee".  The second DA Form 8-24 is
dated 8 July and contains the handwritten notes: "fracture of rt patella".

9.  An SF 88 (Report of Medical Examination, undated, given for the purpose
of transfer, shows in item 73, "Jun '54 Fractured right knee cap" and shows
the applicant was treated at 2nd General Hospital, Landstuhl, Germany.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2.  The letters from the Department of Veteran Services and the applicant's
personal doctor state that his left knee cap was injured.  Since the injury
occurred over 40 years ago and the letters were written relatively recently
(less than 3 years ago), they do not provide first hand information.

3.  This injury occurred in 1954.  Hospital records originated at the time
show that it was the right patella that was fractured.  The right patella
fracture was treated on separate occasions by at least three Army doctors,
one of whom examined the applicant twice, and is referenced in notes
presumably written by attending medical personnel.  It is highly unlikely
that all these doctors and trained medical personnel misdiagnosed and
treated the wrong knee.

4.  In the absence of evidence that shows the applicant's left knee was
injured, while in the service, there is no basis to grant relief in this
case.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 13 May 1955; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on 12 May 1958.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year
statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or
evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
failure to timely file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___MM__  ____LB__  ___CD __  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  _____Mark Manning______
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050001343                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051004                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |124.0100.0000                           |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001343C070206

    Original file (20050001343C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 04 OCTOBER 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001343 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. In the absence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005682

    Original file (20120005682.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He adds: * the first time he submitted his claim it was lost and he had to resubmit it after waiting 3 months * the original claim clearly listed the Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and the length of time * on 25 September 2005, while performing his duties during a route clearance, they were hit with an IED; he felt a tingling sensation all over his shoulder and leg * he was evaluated by a medical team an hour later and after X-rays were taken there was no evidence of any broken bones * he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004402C070206

    Original file (20050004402C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service record shows that he enlisted in the U.S. Army on 27 January 1965. However, the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) was reviewed and found to contain documentation relating to the applicant's U.S. Army enlistment and separation medical examinations, which are, in pertinent part, discussed below. The evidence of record shows that there is only one (dated) entry on each SF 600 by the doctor in question (i.e., on 24 March 1965 and 17 June 1965).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066211C070421

    Original file (2001066211C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that some of his military medical records are not correct. A W.D., AGO Form 8-24 (medical form), dated 7 June 1954 from Madigan Army Hospital states that the applicant sprained the ligaments of the left ankle on 5 May 1954 while running at Yakima Firing Center, Yakima, Washington. There is no evidence of record to show that the applicant sustained a second injury on 17 May 1954 when thrown from a tank at the Yakima Firing Center, Yakima, Washington.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00296

    Original file (PD2012-00296.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the left knee condition as unfitting, rated 20% with application of the Veterans’ Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 6040.44 (4.a) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; and, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008449

    Original file (20140008449.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 May 2013, the approving authority reviewed the case and stated that in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-4 (LOD Policy, Procedures, and Investigations), chapter 2-6, paragraph 6(c), "Line of Duty Determinations must be supported by substantial evidence and by a greater weight of evidence than supports any different conclusion. Paragraph 4-8(e) states information from the medical records will be used to support a determination that an EPTS condition was or was not aggravated by...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00222

    Original file (PD-2013-00222.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : “I was put on NON deployment status and required to take physical therapy for my knees. Pre-SeparationConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Chondromalacia Patella5299-500320%Right Knee Chondromalacia Patella5099-50190%20031021Left Knee Chondromalacia Patella5099-50190%20031021Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 1/NSC x 320031021 Combined: 20%Combined: 0%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20031230 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). BOARD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011447

    Original file (20110011447.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military service records to show he sustained a service-connected spinal injury. A Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 13 July 1971, completed for the purpose of the applicant's Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) shows in the Clinical Evaluation section that the physician evaluated the applicant's lower extremities as abnormal and his spine, other musculoskeletal [groups] as normal. (2) In the Examining Physician section, item 4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000951

    Original file (20150000951.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It essentially states: * symptomatic flat feet; wearing corrective shoes for year * injured right knee in 10th grade; had torn ligament and was told should have an operation but did not follow recommendation * his knee occasionally gives way, but there was no locking or swelling * feet, severe pes planus with tenderness over ankles * impression: * symptomatic pes planus * internal derangement of the right knee by history; chondromalacia (inflammation of the underside of the patella) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010710

    Original file (20060010710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR), in pay grade E-1, on 11 August 1998, for 8 years. Army Regulation 40-501, Chapter 3 (Medical Fitness Standards for Retention and Separation, Including Retirement), gives the various medical conditions and physical defects which may render a Soldier unfit for further military service. It is a fact finding board to investigate the nature, cause, degree of severity, and probable permanency of the...