Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001250C070206
Original file (20050001250C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        14 December 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050001250


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Eric S. Moore                 |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John N. Slone                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Leonard G. Hassell            |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Michael J. Flynn              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he was wounded in the left (L) eye during a mortar
attack on 5 January 1971.  A mortar round blew something into his left eye
while he was running to the flight line to climb into a helicopter.  In
closing the applicant states that he feels the injury warrants the Purple
Heart.

3.  The applicant provides a statement, copies of a page labeled (symptoms,
diagnosis, treatment, treating organization), two pages of medical record
consultations, a page from his rating decision letter from the Veterans
Affairs, his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty), and a letter granting him combat related special compensation from
the Physical Disability Agency.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 31 August 1992, the date of his separation from active duty.
The application submitted in this case is dated 18 January 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. After having had prior enlisted service, the applicant was commissioned
and entered active duty.  He retired on 31 August 1992.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart in
item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons
Awarded or Authorized).

5.  There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded
the Purple Heart.  There are no medical records contained in the available
records.


6.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

7.  The applicant submitted a form showing that someone was treated on
       5 January 1971 at the 228th Flight Dispensary for being hit in L eye
by a small rock during mortar attack and that the small particle center of
cornea L eye was removed.

8.  The applicant submitted a medical record consultation sheet dated 11
June 1992, that has the entry for 25 June 1992 as "fragments in the OS (L
eye) from Vietnam".

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part,
that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of
hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that
the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must required
treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of
official record. This regulation also provides that there is no statute of
limitations on requests for award of the Purple Heart.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's claim of entitlement to the Purple Heart was carefully
considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this
contention.  By regulation, in order to award the Purple Heart it is
necessary to establish that a Soldier was wounded in action, that the wound
required treatment by a medical officer, and the treatment record must have
been made a matter of official record.

2.  The evidence provides no confirmation that the applicant was ever
wounded/injured in action.  It shows that the applicant received fragments
in his left eye; however, it does not show how or when the incident
occurred.  His record is void of any documentary evidence that shows he was
ever treated for a wound sustained in action, or awarded the Purple Heart.

3.  Further, the Purple Heart is not included in the list of authorized
awards listed on the applicant's DD Form 214, which he authenticated with
his signature.  His signature on the separation document indicates he
verified that the information it contained was correct.  Finally, his name
is not included on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, the official DA list of
Republic of Vietnam battle casualties.

4.  Although the veracity of the applicant's claim that he sustained his
injuries in the Republic of Vietnam is not in question, lacking any
corroborating evidence of record showing that he was treated for a
wound/injury that was the direct result of or caused by enemy action, the
regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart
has not been satisfied in this case.  As a result, his request for the
Purple Heart must be denied in the interest of all those who served in the
Republic of Vietnam and who faced similar circumstances.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 31 August 1992.  Therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of an error or injustice
expired on          30 August 1995.  Although the applicant did not file
within the ABCMR's statute of limitations, it is appropriate to waiver
failure to timely file in this case based on the fact there is no statute
of limitations on requests for award of the Purple Heart.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___mjf __  ___lgh __  ___jns____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  ______John N. Slone_________
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050001250                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051214                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          | DENY                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |MR CHUN                                 |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.0015                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001250C070206

    Original file (20050001250C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 31 August 1992, the date of his separation from active duty. There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. This regulation also provides that there is no statute of limitations on requests for award of the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088377C070403

    Original file (2003088377C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he served in Vietnam and was wounded in action on two different occasions. The applicant's service was marred by his AWOL in January 1969, for which he was reduced in grade. Heart with oak leaf cluster for wounds received as a result of hostile action on 12 May 1968 and 18 September 1968, the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001429C070205

    Original file (20060001429C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's second DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in the Republic of Vietnam on 6 November 1968 and the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062112C070421

    Original file (2001062112C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    An order published by 85 th Evacuation Hospital [in Vietnam] shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for the wounds that he received on 7 October 1967. There is no evidence, however, nor has the applicant provided any, to show that he was wounded on another occasion, either on 7 October 1967, or any other date. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Purple Heart, the Army Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003778

    Original file (20090003778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The rating decision states the applicant had been treated for a wound he sustained to his left knee in February 1969. The applicant was wounded a second time in the left knee, in February 1969. While the evidence shows he received treatment by medical personnel for a wound that he sustained to his left knee, there is no evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004810

    Original file (20130004810.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel states: * The applicant was in Korea and assigned to Company B, 6th Engineer CMB Battalion * He was wounded on or about 1 October 1952 in the mouth and face by an artillery shell explosion * He was treated in-country and he was told he would get a Purple Heart * On or about 31 October 1952, he received a wound caused by a hand grenade which blinded him in his left eye * These are two separate incidents * After treatment, he was sent back to the United States and discharged * In 2004,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005508C070206

    Original file (20050005508C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Gerald Purcell | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence confirms the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action and as such, is entitled to an award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by awarding him the Purple Heart wounds sustained on 24 June 1967 while in Vietnam; and b. by showing that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012613

    Original file (20090012613.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, there is no evidence that the grenade that caused his wound was being used at the time of his injury in the heat of battle. Absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action or as a result of "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle," that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record, there is insufficient basis for awarding him...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050000824C070206

    Original file (20050000824C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) shows that the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his military service record to show award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 2 November 1968; b. awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000824C070206

    Original file (20050000824C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service record contains a Standard Form 504 (Clinical Record) which shows the applicant received medical treatment for wounds sustained on 2 November 1968. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his military service record to show award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 2...