Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100264C070208
Original file (2004100264C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:



      BOARD DATE:           1 July 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR2004100264


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. G. E. Vandenberg              |     |Analyst              |


  The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Lana E. McGlynn               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Linda D. Simmons              |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. John T. Meixell               |     |Member               |

      The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his date of discharge be changed to 22 or
23 December 1975 and that the money that was recouped from his retired pay
be repaid.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was previously unable to
provide documentation to show that he was not discharged October 1975 but
was still on active duty through 22 December 1975.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Report of
Separation), Headquarters 7th Army Special Orders Number 342, a DA Form 137
(Installation Clearance Record), a DD Form 1482 (Military Air Command (MAC)
Transportation Authorization), a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired
Army Personnel), and a 17 June 1977 notification of overpayment,

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 23 October 1975, the date of issuance of his DD Form 214.  The
application submitted in this case is dated 19 October 2003.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant's record shows he entered active duty on 20 June 1972,
completed training, and was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 35th Armored
Regiment in Germany.

4.  On 31 May 1974, the motorcycle he was driving was sideswiped by a car
resulting in significant injuries to the applicant.  The accident was
determined to have been in the line of duty.

5.  A Physical Evaluation Board found the applicant unfit for duty by
reason of a physical disability and placed him on the Temporary Disability
Retired List (TDRL) with a 40 percent disability evaluation.

6.  U. S. Army Military Personnel Center, Letter Orders Number D9-285,
dated 28 September 1975 states that the applicant would be released from
active duty on 23 October 1975 and placed on the TDRL effective 24 October
1975.
7.  Headquarters, United States Army, Europe and 7th Army, Heidelberg,
Germany, Special Orders Number 342, dated 8 December 1975, states that the
applicant was to report to the transfer point at Fort Dix, New Jersey on
20 December 1975 for separation processing.  It states that the applicant
was placed on the TDRL on 24 October 1975.  A copy of this order attached
to the applicant's medical record has an additional pen and ink notation
across the front stating "separated 23 October 1975".

8.  An undated DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record) states that the
applicant was to depart at 0600 hours, 22 December 1975 for Fort Dix, New
Jersey.  There are no dates to determine when the applicant cleared the
station.

9.  A DD Form 1482 (Military Air Command (MAC) Transportation
Authorization), issued 19 December 1975 authorized the applicant a military
flight departing 22 December 1975.

10.  A DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel), dated
23 December 1975, indicates that he applicant declined to participate in
the Survivor Benefits Plan.

11.  The applicant's DD Form 214 states that he was medically retired
effective 23 October 1975, with 3 years, 4 months, and 29 days of service.
The applicant signed the DD Form 214 and initialed that he requested a
copy.

12.  The applicant was removed from the TDRL and permanently retired
effective 1 June 1977.

13.  On 17 June 1977, the Chief of Pay Service, Army Finance And Accounting
Center (USAFAC), Indianapolis, Indiana, on a USAFAC Form 20-74 (Request for
Information), notified the applicant that he was not shown to have been on
active duty from 24 October 1975 through 30 December 1975.  The Chief
stated that the military pay voucher (MPV) for December 1975 was for 12 and
1/2 days of accrued leave, travel, and a Social Security tax adjustment.
The Chief noted that the applicant had been overpaid $456.58 and that this
amount would be recouped from his retired pay.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no documentation that the orders transferring the applicant to
the TDRL were modified to retain him on active duty through December 1975.

2.  The applicant has failed to provide any documentation to clearly show
he was on active duty for any period between 24 October 1975 and
23 December 1975.

3.  The fact that the 8 December 1975 7th Army Special Orders Number 342
show that he was released from active duty and placed on the TDRL effective
24 October 1975 indicates that the date on his DD Form 214 is correct.

4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or
injustice now under consideration on 23 October 1975; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on 22 October 1978.  However, the applicant did not file
within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling
explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice
to excuse failure to file in this case.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__LEM __  ___LDS__  __JTM__  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of the case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is insufficient
evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the
applicant’s failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.





            __   Lana E. McGlynn_______
                    CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004100264                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20040701                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |                                        |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |100.02                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018119

    Original file (20120018119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If the FSM elected spouse SBP at the time of his retirement and never changed it after his retirement, the applicant would not have been the spouse SBP beneficiary at the time of the FSM's death. The applicant could apply to the ABCMR to change the FSM's military records to show the FSM elected former spouse coverage and that she applied for the annuity upon the FSM's death. However, since the death certificate provided by the applicant is incomplete and the FSM's marital status at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016440

    Original file (20140016440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 February 1976, he was honorably released from active duty and he was placed on the TDRL effective 20 February 1976 with a 40-percent disability rating. The applicant provided: a. a memorandum from Headquarters, U.S. Walson Army Hospital, dated 11 February 1976, stating he was serving on "active duty for training" on 4 May 1975 when his injury occurred in the line of duty and he was hospitalized during the period 4 May 1975 through 13 November 1975; and b. a memorandum from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015384

    Original file (20060015384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her former spouse, a service member (SM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. This letter stated that the SM’s case was referred to that office by USAFAC and that the Department of the Army SBP Board met on 2 May 1975 and granted authority for the SM to make [or decline] an election under the plan. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059102C070421

    Original file (2001059102C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 92-425, the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), enacted on 21 September 1972, provides that military members on active duty can elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to a surviving spouse and/or dependent children. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011588

    Original file (20120011588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to show he retired in the rank of first lieutenant (O2) or warrant officer one (WO1). The applicant enlisted in Chicago, Illinois, on 26 June 1975, for a period of 3 years, assignment to Korea, and training as an artillery surveyor. He was advanced to pay grade E-4 on 1 October 1976 and on 6 December 1976, he was transferred to Headquarters, United Nations Command/United States Forces – Korea...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012684

    Original file (20060012684.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, to receive a refund of all remaining Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spouse premiums withheld from his military retired pay after the death of his first wife until SBP coverage was reactivated after his second marriage. The applicant's record contains a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel), dated 28 August 1980. The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations; however, based on the available evidence, it would be in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009770

    Original file (20090009770.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PDA concludes that if the applicant can provide current VA documentation confirming that the medical condition did not improve, the ABCMR may want to consider recognizing that the condition incurred in 1971 is still essentially unchanged and it would be an injustice not to correct his military records to reflect a 60 percent permanent military disability rating effective 2 July 1971. VA records further show that the applicant was without use of his right hand over three years after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016339

    Original file (20140016339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He argues that he did not discover the error until 1987 when he discussed the allotments with his father and was told that none of them had ever been received. He acknowledges that his father received a letter, dated 21 October 1988, from the U.S. Army Finance and Accounting Center (USAFAC) stating it had been determined that none of the checks had been cashed and had been replaced. The applicant contends, in effect, that his military records should be corrected to show entitlement to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00605

    Original file (BC-2009-00605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    HQ AFPC/DPAPP was not able to confirm the applicant served in Vietnam; therefore, the applicant is ineligible for Vietnam service awards. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. We note the applicant’s DD Form 214 will be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005952C070205

    Original file (20060005952C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 November 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060005952 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The DA Form 4240 indicates that the applicant was notified by letter on 15 October 1975 of the FSM’s declination of the SBP; however, a copy of the letter is not available. As a result, the Board recommends that: a....