Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011588
Original file (20120011588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  10 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120011588 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to show he retired in the rank of first lieutenant (O2) or warrant officer one (WO1).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he served as a green beret in special operations in about 55 missions and his discharge should reflect that he was retired in the rank of first lieutenant or WO1. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of his Department of Veterans Affairs Identification card, a page from his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), an order removing him from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL), and his Naturalization Certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in Chicago, Illinois, on 26 June 1975, for a period of 
3 years, assignment to Korea, and training as an artillery surveyor.  He completed basic training at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri and advanced individual training at Fort Sill, Oklahoma.

3.  He departed Fort Sill on 21 November 1975 and he was transferred to Korea on 14 December 1975.  He was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Battery (HHB), 6th Battalion, 37th Field Artillery Regiment, 2nd Infantry Division at Camp Essayons in Uijongbu, South Korea for duty as an instrument operator.

4.  He was advanced to pay grade E-4 on 1 October 1976 and on 6 December 1976, he was transferred to Headquarters, United Nations Command/United States Forces – Korea in Seoul, South Korea, where he remained until
23 February 1977, when he was transferred to Fort Bragg, North Carolina, for assignment to HHB, 1st Battalion, 39th Field Artillery Regiment, for duty as an artillery surveyor.

5.  He arrived at Fort Bragg on 24 March 1977 and on 31 March 1977 he was admitted to Womack Army Hospital with a diagnosis of acute psychosis.

6.  On 13 June 1977, a Physical Evaluation Board found the applicant unfit for duty and recommended that he be placed on the TDRL with a 30% disability rating for schizophrenia.

7.  On 13 July 1977, he was honorably retired and he was placed on the TDRL.  He had served 2 years and 17 days of total active service.  On 31 January 1981, he was removed from the TDRL and he was permanently retired by reason of physical disability with a 30% disability rating.

8.  A review of his official records fails to show that he was ever advanced beyond the pay grade of E-4 or that he met the qualifications for appointment as a commissioned or warrant officer. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that he was appointed as a commissioned or warrant officer. 

2.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, there appears to be no basis to grant the applicant’s request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011588



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120011588



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009507

    Original file (20080009507.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart and that he be awarded the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM), the United Nations Service Medal (UNSM), and the Parachutist Badge. However, the evidence of record shows that he is entitled to be awarded the KDSM for his service in Korea from December 1975 to February 1977. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding the award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091821C070212

    Original file (2003091821C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge. There is no credible evidence of record, or evidence provided by the applicant, to show that he was ever wounded as a result of enemy action and authorized an award of the Purple Heart or that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020416

    Original file (20090020416.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a. reconsideration of his previous application for correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and b. correction of his record to show award of the Distinguished Unit Citation [now known as the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC)]. In the absence of evidence showing he was assigned to HHB, 2d Infantry Division Artillery during the period for which the unit was awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016440

    Original file (20140016440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 February 1976, he was honorably released from active duty and he was placed on the TDRL effective 20 February 1976 with a 40-percent disability rating. The applicant provided: a. a memorandum from Headquarters, U.S. Walson Army Hospital, dated 11 February 1976, stating he was serving on "active duty for training" on 4 May 1975 when his injury occurred in the line of duty and he was hospitalized during the period 4 May 1975 through 13 November 1975; and b. a memorandum from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018428

    Original file (20080018428.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of the Board’s 21 October 2008 decision to deny his request to correct his records to show award of three Army Commendation Medals (Army Commendation Medal with second Oak Leaf Cluster), a second Army Good Conduct Medal, and qualification as an expert with the pistol, machinegun, and hand grenade. Documents associated with the applicant’s final award of the Army Commendation, which was originally recommended as a Meritorious Service Medal, is new...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010798

    Original file (20070010798.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was separated from active duty and issued a DD Form 214 showing that he was honorably retired on 5 July 1976 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40. He underwent a periodic physical evaluation, appeared before a formal PEB, was found fit, and was given the opportunity to reenlist and remain in the Army. He was subsequently removed from the TDRL on 30 June 1978 based on a re-evaluation of his medical condition which found him fit for duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001796

    Original file (20110001796.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110001796 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was medically retired by a reason other than schizophrenia. On 13 January 1976, a medical evaluation board (MEB) convened at WRAMC and after consideration of clinical records, laboratory findings, and physical examinations, the MEB found that the applicant was diagnosed as having the medical conditions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013569

    Original file (20060013569.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant on 10 September 1979 and was ordered to active duty on 11 February 1981, to attend the officer rotary wing aviator course (ORWAC) for a period of 34 weeks. Accordingly, his records should be corrected at this time to show that award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010020

    Original file (20140010020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he had a heart condition before entering the Army. f. A DA Form 199, dated 3 February 1977, which shows after consideration of all testimony offered by counsel and the applicant and the medical evidence presented the PEB found that the applicant was physically unfit to perform the duties of his grade by reason of physical disability which was EPTS and which had not been permanently aggravated by service. There is no evidence of record and he provided none showing his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006084

    Original file (20140006084.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It stated, in part, that the promotion of enlisted personnel, appointments, grade reductions, and grade restoration were announced in orders. It states, in part, that items 5a and 5b will show the active duty rank and pay grade at the time of the Soldier's separation; the rank is taken from the Soldier’s promotion/reduction orders; and item 6 shows the date of rank. The evidence of record shows that at the time of his separation, on 25 May 1973, the applicant held the rank/pay grade of PFC/E-3.