Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008598C070208
Original file (20040008598C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           28 July 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040008598


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Wanda L. Waller               |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. William Powers                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Larry Bergquist               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. James Gunlicks                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her discharge date from the U.S. Army
Reserve (USAR) be corrected to show 9 March 2000 instead of 8 January 2002.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that in March 2000 she received direct
orders from the operations noncommissioned officer not to attend/report to
any other required drill duties and to get out of the USAR due to her being
a split option Soldier that was not military occupational specialty
qualified with pregnancy complications.  She complied with his orders and
submitted a request for discharge from the USAR on 19 March 2000.  She
points out that after numerous and unsuccessful attempts to obtain her
discharge orders she received waiver forms in the mail in November/December
2001.  She contends that she was instructed to initial on "I waive all my
rights" so that her discharge orders could be expedited and she did so.
She received her discharge orders in February 2002 with an effective date
of discharge of 8 January 2002.  She further contends that her numerous
attempts to correct her discharge date to show 9 March 2000 were
unsuccessful.  In addition, she incurred a Servicemember's Group Life
Insurance (SGLI) debt to the Department of Defense because she was covered
by SGLI, regardless of whether or not she was performing duty, until her
discharge from the USAR on 8 January 2002.

3.  The applicant provides USAR discharge orders, dated 8 January 2002; a
request for discharge from the USAR, dated 19 March 2000; a notification of
pending discharge, dated 3 May 2000; documents pertaining to her pregnancy;
Leave and Earnings Statements; a letter, dated 17 April 2003, from the
Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in Kansas City, Missouri;
letters, dated 7 May 2003 and 29 July 2004, from a Member of Congress; and
copies of her service personnel records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 12 February 1999 for a period of
8 years.

2.  On 19 March 2000, the applicant submitted a request for discharge from
the USAR due to pregnancy.

3.  Records at DFAS show the applicant performed her last drills in June
2000.

4.  On 8 January 2002, the applicant was discharged from the USAR.

5.  A DFAS letter, dated 17 April 2003, shows the applicant incurred a debt
of $390.81 to the Department of Defense for SGLI coverage which terminated
at the time she was separated in January 2002.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a request for discharge
from the USAR on 19 March 2000 due to pregnancy.  Although the applicant
requests that her USAR discharge date be corrected to show 19 March 2000,
records at DFAS show she performed her last drills in June 2000.
Therefore, it would be equitable to correct her USAR discharge date to 1
July 2000.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

WP_____  LB_____  JG______  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board
recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual
concerned be corrected by amending her discharge date from the USAR to 1
July 2000.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
changing her discharge date to 9 March 2000.




            __William Powers______
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040008598                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050728                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |136.0100                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020934

    Original file (20130020934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for cancellation of a debt in the amount of $472.16 she incurred due to SGLI premiums that were paid on her behalf. Clearly, she was aware that she could make changes to her SGLI coverage prior to the period during which she incurred the SGLI debt.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009500C070208

    Original file (20040009500C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded retirement points for the period that he was denied the opportunity to serve and drill with his unit, back pay and allowance for all drills and service that he could have performed with his unit, consideration of promotion opportunities he missed while he was kept away from his unit, and a refund of payments made for coverage of SGLI (Service members Life Insurance) he was required to make after he was restored to duty with his unit. A...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006322

    Original file (20080006322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s records show that she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 23 January 2003 for a period of 8 years. Section III (Acknowledgement) of the applicant’s DA Form 5261-R (Selected Reserve Incentive Program-Enlistment Bonus Addendum) shows that in connection with her enlistment in the USAR, she elected “assignment to a unit (high priority) authorized by Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) for a bonus entitlement in a military occupational specialty (MOS) that is also...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074808C070403

    Original file (2002074808C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On the same date, he forwarded a memorandum to DFAS, Fort Knox and further recommended that the applicant's request for remission/ cancellation of indebtedness be approved. The applicant's commander also recommended that, if DFAS determined the applicant was responsible for part or all of the debt, repayment be made over a 24-month period. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant's debt to the US Government in the amount...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03098252C070212

    Original file (03098252C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Her orders for initial entry training were subsequently revoked and by August 2002 the applicant’s unit commander notified her that she was being considered for administrative separation as a result of the positive drug test. While the applicant has not submitted any evidence confirming her debt, based on the amount she claims ($260.00), she was covered by the SGLI for 13 months.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017538

    Original file (20080017538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show she enlisted in the Puerto Rico ARNG (PRARNG), in pay grade E-4, on 4 November 1998, for 8 years. The evidence of record shows that the applicant made an election to terminate SGLI coverage for her spouse in September 2003. With respect to her claim, there is no evidence in the record and the applicant did not provide any substantiating evidence that shows there is a debt for $4,500.00 or that this amount was deducted from her severance pay.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018271

    Original file (20080018271.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 April 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080018271 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); a letter, dated 7 May 2007, from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS); an account statement from DFAS; a letter, dated 21 March 2008, from the Deputy Director, Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Headquarters, USAR Command, Fort McPherson, Georgia; discharge orders, dated 20...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088905C070403

    Original file (2003088905C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the effective date of his transfer orders from an active status in a troop program unit (TPU) to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) be changed from May 2002 to August 2002. On 6 August 2002, the 99th RSC published orders assigning him to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) with an effective date of 21 May 2002. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075327C070403

    Original file (2002075327C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the debt she incurred as a result of her enlistment bonus being recouped be remitted. APPLICANT STATES : She was not aware that her enlistment bonus would be recouped if she were separated from her Army Reserve (USAR) unit due to the birth of her child.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087155C070212

    Original file (2003087155C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her application, she provides letters from members of the chain of command that confirm she served and performed drills with a TPU during the period January through May 2002. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was properly appointed in the USAR on 27 November 2001 and that she was an active member of a TPU between 27 November 2001 and 10 June 2002, and that she attended all required drills and annual training during this period. c. showing that she was...