| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Gail J. Wire | Member | ||
| Mr. Antonio Uribe | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that her $6,585.74 debt to government be declared invalid.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that after learning that her chances for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC) were very low, she chose to resign from the United States Army Reserve (USAR). She states that her Personnel Management Officer (PMO) at the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) advised her that the simplest way to do this would be to revoke her USAR appointment orders. She took this advice and her appointment orders were revoked on 10 June 2002. Subsequent to this action, she received letters in November and December 2002 that indicated that she was still in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). In January 2003, she received a letter of indebtedness from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) that indicated that she owed the government $6,585.74 for funds paid to her for service she performed after her separation date.
4. The applicant states that she does not believe she should have to pay back the money she earned during the six months she served in the USAR. She states that her situation is a bit unusual in that she was discharged from the USAR on 30 November 1993, after seven years of active duty service and
14 years of service in the USAR. Although she had 17 years of commissioned service, at that time she only had 11 years of qualifying service for retired pay purposes. On 11 November 2001, she joined a Troop Program Unit (TPU) in the USAR and drilled with that unit from January 2002 through May 2002. She claims that it was not until June 2002 that she discussed her situation with her PMO and it was determined that it was not likely that she would ever complete the requirements necessary to be promoted to LTC. Further, this would prevent her from completing enough service for retirement and as a result, she decided to resign. She claims that it was her intent to resign and she did not realize that revoking her appointment would bring with it the burden of paying back money she already earned based on her service in the TPU.
5. The applicant states that when she last called her PMO he also did not realize the consequences of the action they had taken. She states that based on the facts and circumstances surrounding her separation, she does not believe she is at fault for the incorrect administrative action taken to revoke her appointment instead of processing a resignation. In support of her application, she provides letters from members of the chain of command that confirm she served and performed drills with a TPU during the period January through May 2002.
6. The applicant’s military records show that she served in various active and inactive statuses as a commissioned officer of the USAR between 23 August 1979 and 30 November 1993, at which time she was honorably discharged.
7. On 27 November 2001, she was appointed a major in the USAR and she was assigned to the 914th Combat Support Hospital (CSH), Blacklick, Ohio. She served in this TPU and met all drill and active duty for training requirements for the unit during this period. On 10 June 2002, orders were published that revoked the applicant’s appointment orders.
8. On 10 January 2003, the applicant was notified in a DFAS letter that she was indebted to the government in the amount of $6,585.74 as a result of receiving pay and allowances during periods past her official date of separation.
9. Letters from the former and current commander of the 914th CSH and the
Chief Nurse who supervised the applicant at the TPU were provided in support of her application. These letters all confirm that the applicant was assigned to the 914th CSH on 27 November 2001 and that she attended all required drills and annual training until being separated on 10 June 2002.
10. The ARPERSCOM PMO referred to by the applicant contacted a member of the Board staff and confirmed that he had incorrectly advised the applicant that the best way for her to end her military affiliation was to revoke her appointment orders and not to go through the resignation process. He admits that at the time he gave this advice he did not understand that it would result in the applicant being indebted to the government for the TPU service she actually performed. He also indicated that he attempted to resolve the problem administratively at his command, but could not. As a result, he recommended that the applicant apply to this Board for relief.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s claim that it is unjust for her to have to pay back money she earned while performing duties in her TPU has been carefully considered and it is found to have merit.
2. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was properly appointed in the USAR on 27 November 2001 and that she was an active member of a TPU between 27 November 2001 and 10 June 2002, and that she attended all required drills and annual training during this period.
3. The record also confirms that the applicant took the action that resulted in her indebtedness based on the advice of her PMO, who has subsequently admitted the advice was incorrect and should not have been given.
4. It is clear the applicant performed all the required duties and attended all drills and annual training required with her TPU during the period 27 November 2001 through 10 June 2002. Therefore, it would be inappropriate and unjust to require her to repay money she legitimately earned in good faith.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by:
a. reinstating the 27 November 2001 appointment in the USAR of the individual concerned by revoking Orders Number C-01-202337R, dated 10 June 2002;
b. showing that she was instead honorably discharged from the USAR on 10 June 2002, by reason of voluntary resignation;
c. showing that she was entitled to the pay and allowances she received during the period 27 November 2001 through 10 June 2002, for service she performed in the 914th CSH, Blacklick, Ohio.
2. That DFAS records be corrected to show that her $6,585.74 debt to the government was never valid and reimbursing her any portion of the debt that may have already been collected.
BOARD VOTE:
FE___ __GW___ __AU ___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Fred N. Eichorn
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003087155 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/11/ |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | N/A |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | N/A |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | N/A |
| DISCHARGE REASON | N/A |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 293 | 128.1000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084290C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that he be granted one year of Reserve service credit for the period 13 December 1982 through 13 December 1983. The commander accepted him into his unit as a company commander and the battalion administrative section was directed to submit the required paperwork to the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) in order to consummate this assignment. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was discharged from the Army on 31 July 1983, based on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003082299C070212
At the time the promotion was revoked, ARPERSCOM recommended that the applicant’s request for de facto status be granted in accordance with regulatory guidance. It states that when orders are published revoking an advancement or promotion, the soldier's service in the higher grade may be determined to have been de facto so as to allow the soldier to retain pay and allowances received in that status. In view of the facts of this case, and based on the de facto status determination and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071739C070403
The WOMT denied this request because the RDMS indicated that the applicant was assigned to the Retired Reserve as a LTC. In its earlier consideration of this case, the Board concluded that due to numerous errors in dates in the appointment process and transfers among the RC between June 1996 and February 1999, the applicant was effectively prevented from completing his RC warrant officer training requirements within the prescribed period, which by regulation was three years. The Board in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014517
The applicants unit commander prepared a Memorandum for Record, dated 5 August 2009, confirming the following: a. e. HRC-St. Louis should submit pay documents for the applicant and publish a discharge order effective after the date of her last drill. As a result, the Board recommends that DFAS waive the debt incurred by the applicant based on the erroneous payment of allowances for Reserve drills performed between 7 August and 5 November 2007 in the interest of equity.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074577C070403
The applicant’s military records show that on 7 December 1982, she was commissioned a second lieutenant (2LT) in the Army Nurse Corps (ANC) of the United States Army Reserve (USAR), and that she is currently assigned to the Retired Reserve and is receiving retired pay. By regulation, Retired Reserve members who were removed from active status are ineligible for consideration for promotion to the next higher grade. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was selected for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066210C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090726C070212
The applicant states that she made the promotion list for promotion to the rank of major in January 1998 while assigned to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve (IRR)); however, she had to have a current physical in order to be promoted. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with her application or the evidence of record that her promotion was unduly delayed through no fault of her own or that she in fact met the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003050
On 15 February 2012, the Office of the Army Reserve, MEDCOM, USARC, requested the applicants case be reopened based on her recent mandatory discharge for age with 17 years of qualifying service for retirement, and that the original recommendation provided in the 2010 USARC advisory opinion be considered by the Board. As confirmed by the 2010 USARC advisory opinion, the applicant was unjustly denied the opportunity to earn retirement points during the retirement years ending on 2001, 2002,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091194C070212
The applicant's military personnel records were not available to the Board. The ARPERSCOM advisory opinion points out that the applicant requested retirement point credit service performed between the effective date of his transfer to the Retired Reserve, 9 October 1996, and the date when his official orders transferring him to the Retired Reserve were actually published, 29 August 1997. At this time, the applicant was given the option of accepting separation pay or changing the effective...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003177C070206
The applicant requests correction of item 11 (Primary Specialty), to show the entry, "1 YR 0 MOS (1 year 0 months), instead of the entry, "0 YRS – 0 MOS"; item 12f (Foreign Service), to show the entry, "0000 07" (7 months), instead of the entry, "0000 00 00"; item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized [All periods of service]), to show the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (1st Oak Leaf Cluster), the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and the Combat...