Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002996C070208
Original file (20040002996C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        15 MARCH 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040002996


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Deborah L. Brantley           |     |Senior Analyst       |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Raymond Wagner                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. John Meixell                  |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Jonathon Rost                 |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the separation date on his 2004 separation
document be corrected to show that he was released from active duty on 6
April 2004 vice 18 July 2004.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his separation orders indicate
that he was released from active duty on 6 April 2004.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his separation orders and a copy of
the orders which ordered him to active duty in 2003 in support of Operation
Enduring Freedom.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Documents available to the Board indicate that the applicant was a
member of the California Army National in July 2003 when he was ordered to
active duty for a period not to exceed 270 day in support of Operation
Enduring Freedom.  The order, issued by the Office of the Adjutant General,
State of California, on 2 July 2003, indicate that the applicant was
required to report to Fort McCoy, Wisconsin on 19 July 2003.  The
applicant’s separation document confirms that he did enter active duty on
that date.

2.  According to the applicant’s separation document, he was deployed to
Bosnia from 19 August 2003 until 22 February 2004 during which time he was
in a designated imminent danger pay area.  While deployed, the applicant
performed duties with the 634th Military Intelligence Battalion.

3.  Orders issued on 26 February 2004, by Headquarters, Fort McCoy,
indicate that the applicant was released from active duty on 6 April 2004
at Fort McCoy, and returned to his California Army National Guard
organization.

4.  Notwithstanding the information contained on the applicant’s separation
order, his separation document indicated in item 12b (separation date this
period) that he was released from active duty on 18 July 2004, and that his
“net active service this period” was 1 year.  The applicant authenticated
the separation document.




5.  The applicant’s initiated his application to this Board on 5 May 2004
and indicated that he discovered the error on his separation document on 1
March 2004.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant does not address the reason his separation document
was not corrected prior to his discharge, in spite of noting the error on 1
March 2004, more than a month prior to his April separation date, the
evidence supports a conclusion that the applicant was released from active
duty on 6 April 2004.  His separation orders which were issued at Fort
McCoy shortly after he returned to the United States following his
deployment to Bosnia supports this conclusion.

2.  Although the applicant may have authenticated his separation document,
the fact that he initiated his request to have the document corrected in
May 2004, more than 2 months prior to the July separation date reflected on
the separation document, supports a conclusion that the July 2004
separation was incorrect.

3.  Additionally, the orders which ordered the applicant to active duty in
2003 were for a period not to exceed 270 days.  Based on the information
contained on his separation document the applicant would have been on
active duty for 365 days, thereby exceeding the number of authorized active
duty days.  Separation on 6 April 2004, after approximately 260 days is
consistent with the information contained in his activation orders.

4.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate, and in the interest
of justice and equity, to correct the applicant’s separation document to
show that he was released from active duty on 6 April 2004 vice 18 July
2004, and that his period of active service was for 8 months and 18 days,
vice the 1 year currently recorded.

BOARD VOTE:

___RW__  ___JM___  __JR ___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
showing that he was released from active duty on 6 April 2004 vice 18 July
2004 and that he served a period of 8 months and 18 days of active service
vice the
1 year currently shown.




                                  ____ Raymond Wagner_____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040002996                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050315                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |110.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005554C070206

    Original file (20050005554C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that these awards are not reflected on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 12 April 2004. However, the applicant's DD Form 214 showed that she entered active duty on 22 July 2003. HRC Awards Branch personnel have advised that the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal has been awarded, and will continue to be awarded, to all Army personnel who serve on active duty for 30 consecutive days, or more,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024226

    Original file (20110024226.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * orders for deployment in February 2003 * Fort McCoy Military Personnel Division (MPD) Form 2543 (U.S. Army Reserve Active Guard and Reserve (AGR) End of Tour) * Certificate of Achievement * orders for deployment in August 2005 * three personal statements CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The Fort McCoy MPD Form 2543, provided by the applicant, shows he was deployed to Germany, Kuwait, and Iraq from 9 February 2003 to 3 February 2004. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011436

    Original file (20070011436.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    United States Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command, Fort Bragg, North Carolina Memorandum, dated 27 November 2006, shows that the G1 requested, in effect, the publishing of backdated COTTAD orders showing that the applicant was ordered to active duty as a member of his Reserve Component unit in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom under the provisions of 10 U.S.C 12301 for a period of 545 days commencing 28 February 2006. United States Army Civil Affairs and Psychological...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007293

    Original file (20100007293.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the following: * deployment dates to Iraq from 4 March 2003 to 1 June 2003 and from 22 July 2005 to 20 July 2006 * award of the Meritorious Service Medal 2. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * DD Form 214 * deployment orders, dated 7 June 2005 * letter of release memorandum for record, dated 28 June 2006 * individual/unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002421C070208

    Original file (20040002421C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Larry Olson | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. His request to correct is reentry code is not granted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009315

    Original file (20100009315.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Personnel Policy Guidance, in effect at the time of the applicant's mobilization, stated that the COTTAD policy applied to Soldiers in the following categories: Category 1: Applies to Soldiers preparing for mobilization who do not have sufficient partial mobilization authority under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12302 remaining to complete required BOG period with their units, and voluntarily request a COTTAD in order to complete 12 months BOG with their units (Outside...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012890

    Original file (20070012890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his records should be amended to show that he completed 730 days of involuntary mobilization under the provisions of section 12302 of Title 10 United States Code (10 U.S.C. The applicant's record shows that he retired from the United States Army Reserve effective 31 December 2007. Category 4: Applies to Soldiers mobilized under the provisions of section 12302 of Title 10 United States Code, partial mobilization, who are deployed OCONUS and who request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013833

    Original file (20080013833.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 with a separation date of 29 May 2004 documents 119 days of active duty. HRC-STL recommended the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period from 9 January 2005 to 15 March 2005 show active service in Operation Enduring Freedom. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. HRC-STL reviewing the applicant's records of service and amending items 12d and 12e of his DD Form 214 with a separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002871,

    Original file (20080002871,.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Director Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: Chairperson Member Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Evidence shows that the applicant was involuntarily mobilized for 904 days during the periods 11 February 2003 through 4 February 2004 and 14 January 2007 through 11 July 2008 under 12302 status. As a result it would be appropriate that the Defense Finance and Accounting Service pay the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021695

    Original file (20140021695.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, reinstatement in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in pay grade E-4 with no break in service, Reentry Code (RE) Code 1, retirement point credit retroactive to 5 October 2012, and all back pay and allowances. Thus, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records by revoking his USAR discharge orders, thereby effecting his reinstatement in the USAR effective 27 September 2012 (with no break in military service), and showing he has had continued active...