Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04102401C070208
Original file (04102401C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:         07 OCTOBER 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR2004102401


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock             |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Walter Morrison               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Paul Smith                    |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Patrick McGann                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, Army
Commendation Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Georgia Army National
Guard medals, and medals that she earned during Operation Desert
Shield/Desert Storm – Bronze Star Medal, Presidential Unit Citation, and
Meritorious Unit Commendation.

2.  The applicant states that the awards were omitted from her records.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty), a copy of a letter from the
National Personnel Records Center concerning her records, a copy of a
reassignment order and the amendment thereto, and a copy of a discharge
order.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 31 March 1989.  The application submitted in this case is
dated       2 January 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant's complete official military personnel records (OMPF) are
not available.  The evidence in this case is essentially that submitted by
the applicant.

4.  The applicant enlisted in the Army for three years on 1 April 1986.
She was released from active duty on 31 March 1989 at Fort Myer, Virginia.
Her            DD Form 214 shows that she was a military police Soldier,
and that she had completed a 17-week law enforcement course in July 1986.
She was awarded the Army Service Ribbon and the Driver and Mechanic Badge.
She had no overseas service.

5.  On 1 April 1989 she enlisted in the Georgia Army National Guard for
five years.  On 3 May 1994 the applicant was discharged from the Army
Reserve.  She had completed her 8-year statutory military service
obligation.

6.  There is no evidence and the applicant has not submitted any, which
adequately reflects her military service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Because the applicant's complete record of military service is not
available, and because the applicant has not provided any adequate evidence
regarding her service, her entitlement to the requested awards cannot be
confirmed.  Consequently, her request for those awards cannot be granted.


2.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 31 March 1989; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on         30 March 1992.  However, the applicant did not file
within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling
explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice
to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___WM__  ___PS __  ___PM __  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  _____Walter Morrison_______
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004102401                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20041007                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03098272C070212

    Original file (03098272C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If his condition was severe enough for the VA to grant him a 30 percent disability rating, then he should have received a medical discharge from the Army. On 30 August 2000 the VA notified the applicant that his optic neuritis to his left eye was service connected with a 30 percent disability rating. The VA, which has neither the authority, nor the responsibility for determining physical fitness for military service, awards disability ratings to veterans for conditions that it determines...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011206

    Original file (20060011206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060011206 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (First Oak Leaf...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002861

    Original file (20080002861.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The DD Form 214 she was issued at the time shows she was honorably released from ADSW for completion of a period of active duty on 22 February 1990, by reason of self-terminating Orders 023-105, dated 12 October 1989. The evidence of record shows that the applicant entered active duty in ADT and/or ADSW status on 1 October 1989.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002772

    Original file (20140002772.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 29 August 1986 to show the same awards and decorations that are listed in item 9 (Awards, Decorations & Campaigns) of her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record). She contends she should have a final DD Form 214; however, USAR Soldiers not on active duty receive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003446

    Original file (20150003446.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending on 23 November 1982 to show she was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal and the National Defense Service Medal (2nd Award). Her record contains a memorandum, dated 23 February 1990, wherein her commander at the time requested the Commander, USAR Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) retroactively award her with the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 26...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064147C070421

    Original file (2001064147C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no documentation of the applicant’s official status for the period from 11 June 1986 through 27 August 1987 (1 year, 2 months, 17 days); however, it appears that the KSARNG had some type of information that showed that the applicant was in an inactive reserve status during this period. The Board finds that the orders awarding the applicant her 1983 and 1986 AAM are in error. While the actual orders for the applicant’s ARCOM have not been located, the Board concludes that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016285C071029

    Original file (20060016285C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Karmin S. Jenkins | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence of record to show she was disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding her the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 2 October 1986 through 3 January 1989; and b. amending her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020095

    Original file (20140020095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the following corrections to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 14 September 1989: * add a second award of the Army Achievement Medal * add 1 day of active duty she served while serving her reserve obligation 2. The applicant provides her DD Form 214 with a separation date of 14 September 1989. There is insufficient evidence to add a second award of the Army Achievement Medal to her DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091063C070212

    Original file (2003091063C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show six awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal, an award of the Bronze Star Medal, and an award of the Army Achievement Medal. The applicant's service subsequent to the ending period of his third award of the Army Good Conduct Medal was honorable and faithful, as indicated by his completion of BNCOC, his two awards of the Army Commendation Medal, and his award of the Army Achievement Medal. The applicant does not have the required 3...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001050C070208

    Original file (20040001050C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. There is no DD Form 214 in the record for this period of active service. The applicant's records do not support his request that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show award of the OSR.