IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 20 October 2015
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003446
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending on 23 November 1982 to show she was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal and the National Defense Service Medal (2nd Award).
2. The applicant states, in effect, the retroactive awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 November 1980 to 23 November 1982 and the National Defense Service Medal for the periods 15 April 1989 through 18 April 1995 and 10 August 1999 to present have not been annotated in her records.
3. The applicant provides:
* DD Form 214
* Honorable Discharge Certificate - Army
* a memorandum, dated 23 February 1990
* Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter)
* Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 15 February 2015
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of
Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 November 1980.
3. She was honorably released from active duty on 23 November 1982 and transferred to U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training). Her DD Form 214 shows she was awarded or authorized the Army Service Ribbon and the Overseas Service Ribbon.
4. Her record does not contain any derogatory information that would indicate her commander intended to deny her the Army Good Conduct Medal.
5. She provided a chronological statement of retirement points showing the following periods of military service:
* Regular Army: 25 September 1980 - 23 November 1982
* USAR: 24 November 1982 - 25 November 1986
* Break in Service: 26 November 1986 - 25 June 1987
* U.S. Navy Reserve (USNR): 26 June 1987 - 14 April 1989
* USAR: 15 April 1989 - 18 April 1995
* Break in Service: 19 April 1995 - 9 August 1999
* Army National Guard (ARNG): 10 August 1999 - 9 August 2005
* USAR: 10 August 2005 - 9 August 2014 (it is presumed this service has continued to the present date)
6. Her record contains a memorandum, dated 23 February 1990, wherein her commander at the time requested the Commander, USAR Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) retroactively award her with the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 November 1980 to 23 November 1982. However, her record does not contain any evidence that indicates ARPERCEN took any action on this request.
7. Her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record Part II), which is part of her official military record, shows she was awarded the National Defense Service Medal (2nd Award).
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of active Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and
30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined. Second and subsequent awards of the National Defense Service Medal are denoted by a bronze service star affixed to the National Defense Service Medal.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant served on active duty from 26 November 1980 to 23 November 1982 and was honorably released from active duty. Her record does not contain any derogatory information that would indicate her commander intended to deny her this award. It appears she met the criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.
2. Her official military record does indicate she received two awards of the National Defense Service Medal. However, these awards are properly not listed on her DD Form 214 because the awards were for two periods that occurred after the period covered by her DD Form 214.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
____X___ ____X___ ____X___ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period
26 November 1980 to 23 November 1982; and
b. adding to her DD Form 214 for the period ending 23 November 1982 the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award).
2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding two awards of the National Defense Service Medal to her DD Form 214 for the period ending 23 November 1982.
_______ _ _X_____ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150003446
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150003446
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609487C070209
Also, he requests correction of his records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow enlistment. The U.S. Army Enlistment Eligibility Activity (USAEEA), in a comment, opined that the reentry code RE-3C is correct as shown on the applicants DD Form 214 in accordance with table 3-6, Army Regulation 601-210, dated 14 February 1990. The reentry code of RE-3C applies to persons who have completed more than 4 months service who do not meet the basic eligibility pay grade...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026044
The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of her earlier request for correction to item 18 (Remarks) on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending 11 June 1982 where it states, "1 day excess leave from 4 October 1981 to 5 October 1981." As new issues, she requests: a. in effect, correction of item 26 (Separation Code) of her 1982 DD Form 214 and award of a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) incentive under the Student Loan Repayment Program...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000112
The applicant requests correction of her records as follows: a. award of military occupational specialty (MOS) 94B1O (Cook); b. award and issue of the following medals: * Army Achievement Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Southwest Asia Service Medal * Kuwait Liberation Medal * Cold War Certificate c. correction of section VII (Current and Previous Assignments) of her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record (PQR)) to show all her assignments. The DD Form...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015148
The applicant requests that her military records be corrected to show her service in the Regular Army (RA). b. USAR - 9 August 1982 to 8 August 1986 - honorable service. Her official military records show: a. USAR - 4 August 1980 to 3 August 1986 with active duty for training from 8 August to 8 November 1980, and she was issued an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016175C070206
It states, in pertinent part, that the information contained on the DD Form 214 will apply only to the period of service covered by the DD Form 214, unless otherwise specified, and that only those specialties that have been awarded in accordance with Army Regulation 611- 201 and that have been held for at least 1 year, are authorized for entry on the DD Form 214. In accordance with the applicable regulation, the USAR service that was completed after the period covered should not be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101066C070208
He also asks for removal of all documents or any references to fraudulent enlistment or fraudulent documents from all military records, including those held by the CAARNG and the Defense Security Service; and other relief the Board deems appropriate. These include the following: Exhibit 1 – 6 October 1997 CAARNG Orders 279-531 discharging the applicant from the ARNG and as a Reserve of the Army with a general discharge under the provisions of National Guard Regulation 600-200, paragraph...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608092C070209
Army Regulation 635-5, the regulation governing the preparation of DD Form 214, pertinently provides that the purpose of the DD Form 214 is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of active military service and to furnish a record for interested government agencies which assist the individual in obtaining the rights and benefits which may accrue as the result of such service. The RE code alone is not sufficient to effect a reenlistment. There is no reason, therefore, to change...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607996C070209
The applicant requests correction of her military records to show that she was assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of RE-2 instead of RE-3. Her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) indicates that she was honorably released from active duty on 6 September 1994, in pay grade E-2, under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 8 (pregnancy); that she was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Annual), ARPERCEN; that she had not been awarded an MOS; that she had...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010331
The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of her application: a. DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 31 December 1992. b. U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (now known as HRC), St. Louis, Missouri, Memorandum, dated 31 December 1992, appointing her as a Reserve commissioned officer. e. Page 1 of Standard Form 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 26 October 2000. f. Headquarters, 75th Division (Training Support),...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021686
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the: * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) * Army Good Conduct Medal * Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal * Meritorious Service Medal 2. Although his conduct and efficiency ratings can't be determined from the available evidence, given his honorable service, foreign service tour completion, attainment of the rank/grade...