Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091334C070212
Original file (2003091334C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 05 FEBRUARY 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003091334


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deborah L. Brantley Senior Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Mr. John P. Infante Member
Ms. Karen A. Heinz Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2. The applicant states he was wounded while on a transport escort detail and never received an award of the Purple Heart. He states that he was treated at an evacuation hospital and returned to duty. In January 1968 he states he was evacuated to Japan and then to the United States for another medical reason and believes his recommendation for award of the Purple Heart was either lost or misplaced.

3. The applicant states he should have been given this award because he earned it. He states he was told that he deserved an award of the Purple Heart and “maybe the Bronze Star.”

4. The applicant provides a medical record extract indicating removal of fragments from left leg and left forearm.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant is requesting correction of an injustice which occurred on
31 May 1984. The application submitted in this case is dated 9 May 2003.

2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant entered active duty on 9 April 1964 and served continuously until 31 May 1984 when he retired for length of service. At the time of his retirement he was serving in pay grade E-7. During his military career he performed duties as a duty Soldier, recruiter, communications terminal supervisor, infantryman, aircraft electrician, and administration clerk.

4. The applicant arrived in Vietnam in June 1967 where he was initially assigned duties as an aircraft electrician with the 330th Transportation Company. On
21 July 1967 he assumed duties as a “duty soldier” with the same organization.

5. The medical extract, submitted by the applicant in support of his request, contains no identification information. It notes, however, that on 25 January 1967 the individual had “fragments” removed from the left leg and left forearm. The next entry, on 17 January 1968 noted “bilateral pitting edema above boot tops” but there was no infection of the feet or legs. It also noted that the individual had been sitting a lot for the past 2 days.

6. According to the applicant’s Department of the Army Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) he was placed in a patient status on 31 January 1968 and ultimately evacuated to Walter Reed Army Medical Center. As noted in the applicant’s petition to the Board, his evacuation was related to a medical condition not associated with his claim of being wounded as a result of hostile action.

7. There is no indication the applicant was ever awarded the Purple Heart or inquired about his entitlement prior to his 1984 discharge. Item 40 (wounds) on his Department of the Army Form 20 is blank. The applicant last authenticated the information on the form in 1973. The applicant’s name is not among a list of individual’s reported as combat casualties during the Vietnam War.

8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides, in pertinent part, that the Bronze Star Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendation, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders is required. Recommendations must be made within 2 years of the event or period of service and the award must be made within 3 years.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. Unfortunately, not only does the medical document not identify the record as belonging to the applicant, it does not indicate the source of the fragments. There is no evidence confirming that the fragments resulted from hostile actions. In the absence of more compelling medical evidence that the applicant was wounded as result of hostile action, there is no basis for an award of the Purple Heart.

2. His contention that his recommendation might have been lost or misplaced is not supported by any evidence. The applicant remained in Vietnam for nearly 2 months after he states he was wounded. Additionally, he has offered no explanation why he did not pursue the award, for which he believed he qualified, until nearly 20 years after his retirement from active duty, and more than 30 years after the incident.
3. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, that he was recommended for or awarded the Bronze Star Medal while in Vietnam.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.

5. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 31 May 1984; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on
30 May 1987. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__FNE __ __JPI __ __KAH __ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law. Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                  ____Fred N. Eichon______
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003091334
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20040205
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018346

    Original file (20080018346.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Good Conduct Medal. Evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received as a result...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003239

    Original file (20070003239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Records show that the applicant participated in eight campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060063C070421

    Original file (2001060063C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that he received the Purple Heart for the one wound that he received on 5 March, and for the wounds that he received on 30 April and 4 May, but not for the other two wounds. However, a clinical record cover sheet indicates that the applicant was wounded in the left leg and the left shoulder, that he was admitted to the 36 th on 7 March 1967 and returned to duty on 12 March 1967. The 24 October 1967 report of medical history shows that the applicant indicated that he received a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007411

    Original file (20100007411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's military service records awarding him the Purple Heart. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. In the absence of military records which show the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds resulting from hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026430

    Original file (20100026430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    No combat injuries or wounds are recorded on his medical records; however, an entry "scar to left leg" was entered on his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination). In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 is not available for review, his service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his record is void of any official Army telegrams or Western Union telegrams, and there is no conclusive evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014863

    Original file (20090014863.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a direct result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received on 29 July 1967 and b. adding the following awards to item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214: (1) the Purple Heart, (2) the Valorous Unit Award, (3)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001212

    Original file (20080001212.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show that he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 6 April 1967 to 30 March 1968. The clinical record form also states that "the Purple Heart was awarded per General Orders 194, dated 11 December 1967, Headquarters, 24th Evacuation Hospital." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 10 December 1967,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000097

    Original file (20140000097.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is evidence of record that shows the applicant was twice wounded in Vietnam. However, there is no available evidence showing he received any additional awards of the Purple Heart. __________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010196

    Original file (20140010196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he received two awards of the Purple Heart. The applicant states he received two awards of the Purple Heart while serving in Vietnam but his DD Form 214 only documents one award. The evidence of record shows the applicant received fragment wounds to his left side and his right leg on 19 May 1967.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005987

    Original file (20140005987.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows the applicant sustained a fragment wound to his left leg during his service in the RVN and he provides his VA Rating Decision which shows he was granted a service-connected disability for a shrapnel wound to his right extremity. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...