Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010196
Original file (20140010196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 February 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140010196 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he received two awards of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he received two awards of the Purple Heart while serving in Vietnam but his DD Form 214 only documents one award.  He believes this error to be an administrative oversight.  

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and two letters, dated 20 April 2014 and 21 May 2014.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 1 November 1966.  He held military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) and attained the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 24 April 1967 to 18 April 1968 and he was assigned to Company B, 1st Battalion, 5th Infantry Regiment, 25th Infantry Division from 3 May 1967 to 15 April 1968.  

* Item 40 (Wounds) contains one entry showing he received a fragment wound to his left side and right leg on 19 May 1967
* Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) shows only one award of the Purple Heart 

4.  12th Evacuation Hospital General Order (GO) Number 104, dated 20 May 1967, awarded him the Purple Heart (1st Award) for wounds he sustained in action against a hostile enemy on 19 May 1967.  

5.  There are no subsequent GOs in his record that show he was awarded the Purple Heart (2nd Award).  

6.  His name was listed on the Vietnam casualty roster a single time.  This entry shows he was treated for wounds he received on 19 May 1967.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System – an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 and maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch – failed to reveal orders awarding him the Purple Heart (2nd Award).

8.  His record does not contain a Western Union telegram or medical records to show he was wounded in action a second time and/or treated for a second combat injury/wound incurred on a different date.

9.  He was honorably released from active duty on 28 August 1968.  His DD Form 214 lists one award of the Purple Heart. 

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  Not more than one award will be made for more than one wound or injury received at the same instant or from the same missile, force, explosion, or agent.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant received fragment wounds to his left side and his right leg on 19 May 1967.  His record does not contain and he has not provided any evidence that shows he was injured in combat prior to or after that date.

2.  The applicant received multiple fragments wounds on the same day.  However, only one award will be issued if the wounds were sustained at the same time as a result of the same explosive or hostile agent.  Additionally, there is no evidence and he has not provided evidence such as his medical records to show his injuries were caused by separate events in the same engagement.

3.  Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to grant the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010196



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140010196



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017314

    Original file (20100017314.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states the Purple Heart was awarded for an injury or wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The evidence of record also shows he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during his service in the Army, he attained the rank and pay grade of sergeant/E-5, served in Vietnam, and was wounded in action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081117C070215

    Original file (2002081117C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He contends that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) awarded him a second award of the Purple Heart for a separate bullet wound to his head on 14 February 1968. The applicant also provided an application for correction of his military records, dated 17 April 2003, which requests award of the Purple Heart for a right The applicant provided a second application for correction of his military records, dated 17 April 2003, which requests award of the Purple Heart for a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009925

    Original file (20130009925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * award of the Purple Heart for a combat wound in Vietnam in 1964 * award of the Purple Heart for a combat wound in Vietnam in 1969 * award of the Purple Heat for a punji stick combat injury in Vietnam * award of the Amphibious Landing Medal (i.e., the Arrowhead Device) 2. There are no medical records available. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062112C070421

    Original file (2001062112C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    An order published by 85 th Evacuation Hospital [in Vietnam] shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for the wounds that he received on 7 October 1967. There is no evidence, however, nor has the applicant provided any, to show that he was wounded on another occasion, either on 7 October 1967, or any other date. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Purple Heart, the Army Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014006

    Original file (20110014006.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His truck was hit and glass flew in his face. He served in Vietnam from on or about 3 November 1966 to on or about 6 August 1967. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and sincerity, in the absence of documentation that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012827

    Original file (20120012827.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Purple Heart requires: * a wound as a result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by military medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records 3. There is also no evidence in the available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of corroborating evidence of record showing he was injured and treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the health record provided by the applicant is not sufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000086

    Original file (20100000086.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (first award) for the period 7 September 1967 to 6 June 1969; b. deleting the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019403

    Original file (20100019403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This extract recounts the attack and lists the number of casualties, but makes no mention of the applicant by name. They each recall the attack that occurred on 3 December 1967. a. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have been treated by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000671

    Original file (20100000671.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or discharge) to show he was awarded the Purple Heart (Second Oak Leaf Cluster). The applicant states: * He received his first Purple Heart by itself on 25 March 1968 * His second and third Purple Hearts were issued very close together (on 12 April 1968 and 23 April 1968) so he was awarded the Purple Heart with Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster * He has three Purple Hearts, not two,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000591

    Original file (20140000591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant was involved in an ammunition dump explosion when he appears to have sustained his low back injury and later received treatment for this injury. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of additional official documentary evidence to corroborate the events...