Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007411
Original file (20100007411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100007411 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he was injured in combat in Vietnam in May 1968.  He states he was treated for his injury, but he was never awarded the Purple Heart.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* 37 pages from his service medical records
* his separation orders

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military personnel records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 22 August 1967.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  On 4 August 1968, he was awarded military occupational specialty 76P (Stock Control and Accounting Specialist).

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 13 February 1968 to 9 February 1969.

4.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not contain any entries indicating the applicant received any wounds.

5.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not show award of the Purple Heart.

6.  The applicant's service medical records show he received treatment for a wound on his left forearm and left leg on 7 May 1968.  The etiology of these wounds is not shown in the record.  On 11 May 1968, he was treated for a fragment in the palm of his left hand, but the fragment was unable to be located.  The etiology of this wound was not shown in the record.  The record shows he continued to receive treatment for these injuries through 27 June 1968.

7.  On 21 August 1969, the applicant was released from active duty.  He had completed 2 years of active service that was characterized as honorable.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart.

8.  There are no orders in the applicant's military service records awarding him the Purple Heart.

9.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty listing.

10.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart for the applicant.

11.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), then in effect, provided that the Purple Heart was awarded to any member of an Armed Force or any civilian national of the United States who while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services had been wounded, killed, or who had died as a result of a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should be awarded the Purple Heart for an injury he received in combat in Vietnam in May 1968.

2.  The applicant's service medical records show he received treatment for injuries to his left forearm and left leg on 7 May 1968 and for injuries to the palm of his left hand on 11 May 1968.  However, the records do not show he received these injuries as a result of enemy action.

3.  Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not list any wounds and he is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Listing.

4.  In the absence of military records which show the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds resulting from hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100007411



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                     

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003232

    Original file (20150003232.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * VA Rating Decision, dated 18 October 2007 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Combat Infantryman Badge 13. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017857

    Original file (20130017857.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was combat wounded in Vietnam * during a firefight in the jungles of Vietnam he sustained shrapnel wounds in the left forearm and left side of his head 3. The Purple Heart requires evidence to verify: * the wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records 3. In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was injured and treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014783

    Original file (20080014783.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's military service records awarding him the Purple Heart. Therefore, the undated letter submitted by the applicant from the VA is not sufficient evidence to show his wound to his left arm was received as a result of hostile action. In the absence of military records which show that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds resulting from hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003239

    Original file (20070003239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Records show that the applicant participated in eight campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020541

    Original file (20120020541.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. His available service medical records show he listed a shrapnel wound in December 1969 and the military medical doctor found evidence of a scar on his right forearm. In the absence of orders or other additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013271

    Original file (20090013271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and its addition to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 30 August 1967. Based on the evidence in this case, the applicant is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart and its addition to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018667

    Original file (20070018667.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board noted that there were no PH award orders on file in his record and no personnel service record entries that indicated that the applicant was ever wounded in action or awarded the PH. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action, or awarded the PH. The applicant was also provided a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to include these awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018346

    Original file (20080018346.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Good Conduct Medal. Evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received as a result...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006727

    Original file (20140006727.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. This is accepted as sufficient evidence to correct his DD Form 214 to show his DOB as 24 May 1946. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * amending his DD Form 214 by deleting the current DOB and adding the DOB as it is listed on his birth...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011942

    Original file (20080011942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show the second award of the Purple Heart (referred to as First Oak Leaf Cluster) for wounds he received on 23 September 1968, and the Bronze Star Medal. Therefore, the evidence presented is insufficient to award the Purple Heart (First Oak Leaf Cluster). Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned to award the...