Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091004C070212
Original file (2003091004C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 8 January 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003091004

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Kathleen A. Newman Chairperson
Mr. John T. Meixell Member
Ms. Linda M. Barker Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:


1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election made by her deceased ex-spouse, a former service member (FSM), be changed to former spouse coverage.

2. The applicant states, in effect, that at the time of the FSM’s death his SBP election was his current spouse; however, her divorce decree granted her entitlement to SBP and forbade any subsequent changes.

3. The applicant provides a copy of the FSM’s death certificate, their marriage certificate, and their divorce decree in support of her application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. On 31 December 1990, the FSM was released from active duty for the purpose of retirement after completing 20 years, 2 months, and 10 days of active military service. At the time, he held the rank and pay grade of sergeant first class/E-7 and he was placed on the Retired List in that rank and pay grade on
1 January 1991.

2. During his retirement processing, the FSM completed a Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel (DA Form 4240). In Part II (SBP Election) of this form, he elected spouse and dependent children full coverage.

3. The applicant and FSM were divorced on 29 July 1998. The division of marital property portion of the divorce decree stipulated that the applicant should be named beneficiary under the Uniform Services SBP and that the FSM’s election to provide SBP benefits to the applicant should be continued in full force and should not be altered or withdrawn by the FSM during his lifetime. It further stated that the FSM should immediately designate the applicant, his former spouse, beneficiary under the SBP and the applicant would continue to remain beneficiary as former spouse under that plan. The FSM was further ordered to immediately obtain, fully complete, sign, and return to the Army all SBP election documents, papers, and forms necessary to provide SBP benefits to the applicant as his former spouse and simultaneously provide the applicant copies of those documents, papers, and forms. It finally ordered that the applicant not modify, amend, withdraw, or in any other manner alter the election to name the applicant beneficiary of the SBP.

4. The record shows that neither the FSM nor the applicant took any action to request a change to the FSM’s SBP election to former spouse coverage within a year of the divorce decree being issued, as is required by law.

5. The FSM’s spouse SBP election remained in effect and on 15 October 1998, he remarried. He died on 25 Janaury 2003. His spouse at the time of his death is receiving the FSM’s SBP benefit based on the SBP election in force at the time of the FSM’s death.

6. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses.

7. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP. It permits a person who, incident to a proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse to make such an election. If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made. Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS :

1. The evidence shows that an injustice has occurred in this case; however, no Board corrective action will be taken because that action would cause another injustice by depriving the FSM’s spouse of property interest without due process.

2. The evidence of record confirms that the SBP election in force at the time of the FSM’s death was spouse coverage, and based on this election his wife at the time of his death is now receiving the SBP benefit.

3. The record shows that the FSM failed to make a former spouse coverage SBP election as was ordered by the applicant’s divorce decree. As a result, the law allowed the applicant one year to submit a written request that a former spouse coverage election be deemed to have been made. However, there is no evidence to show the applicant ever submitted such a request within the time prescribed, although she should have known that the FSM had not taken steps to comply with the court’s order.

4. The legal staff and Board has determined that the law prohibits granting the applicant’s requested relief at this time and absent the consent of the current spouse to change the FSM’s SBP election to former spouse coverage in lieu of spouse coverage, granting the requested relief is not possible in this case. The applicant’s only recourse at this time is to return to the courts for resolution.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_ KAN ___ __ LB ___ __ JM ____ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.





                  _Kathleen A. Newman
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003091004
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2004/01/08
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1990/12/31
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200
DISCHARGE REASON Retirement
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 346 137.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008753

    Original file (20140008753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse based on their divorce decree. The FSM's service record is void of evidence that indicates he made a voluntary election or the applicant made a deemed election to change his SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse coverage within 1 year of their divorce. Title 10, U.S. Code, section...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002035C070208

    Original file (20040002035C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides 4 pages of their divorce decree; an undated DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record under the Provisions of Title 10, U. S. Code, Section 1552) signed by the FSM; an Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage dated 23 May 2004 and signed by the applicant; and a Certificate of Appointment from the State of South Carolina, County of Richland Probate Court. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003999

    Original file (20070003999.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. Therefore, it would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004313C070205

    Original file (20060004313C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record that indicates the applicant submitted a written request for a deemed election for former spouse coverage. The FSM retired on 1 May 1986 and elected SBP spouse and dependent children coverage. It stated that “[FSM] shall not, during his lifetime, provide, modify, amend, withdraw, or in any other manner alter the election to name [applicant] beneficiary of the Armed Services Survivor Benefit Plan.” However, there is no evidence of record that shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010711

    Original file (20110010711.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, Mary, a former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The applicant states: * she and the FSM were married from January 1950 to June 1995 * when he retired in 1973, the FSM elected spouse only SBP coverage * the divorce decree directed the FSM to change his SBP election to former spouse coverage * neither she nor the FSM made a deemed election...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016751

    Original file (20110016751.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the member fails to make such an election, the law also permits the former spouse concerned to request that a former spouse SBP coverage election be deemed to have been made, if the request is made within one year of the date of a court order of divorce. The evidence of record indicates that the FSM failed to elect SBP coverage for his former spouse at the time of his retirement on the DD Form 2656. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000870

    Original file (20070000870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 July 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070000870 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053722C070420

    Original file (2001053722C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests on behalf of her mother, in effect, that the records of her deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. On 23 September 1988, the FSM and the applicant’s mother divorced. It appears that the FSM may have failed to request, in writing as required by law, a change to his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage due to the strict wording of the court decree, i. e., that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015805

    Original file (20060015805.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests that the records of the FSM be corrected to show the applicant made a timely request for a deemed election of his SBP. Counsel states, in effect, that the applicant and the FSM agreed to a Stipulated Military Qualifying Court Order, dated 23 August 2005, ordering the FSM to make the applicant the irrevocable beneficiary of the survivor benefit portion of the FSM's pension. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017318

    Original file (20130017318.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a letter dated 4 June 2012, DFAS advised the applicant that their records did not show that the FSM had ever requested to change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse. The applicant contends, in effect, that the records of the FSM should be corrected to show he changed his SBP election from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage and to pay her an SBP annuity. The applicant did not request an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made within one year of...