Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008753
Original file (20140008753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


		BOARD DATE:	  12 March 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140008753 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse based on their divorce decree.

2.  The applicant states she never got proper help to file for SBP benefits.  She didn't receive any forms or any other documents besides a letter of approval upon filing a "former spouse form."

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored letter, a Domestic Relations Order (Military Retirement), and a final divorce decree.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The FSM and the applicant were married on 26 April 1983.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 October 1989.

2.  The applicant provided the final divorce decree and Domestic Relations Order which shows the FSM and the applicant were divorced on 8 March 2007.  The Domestic Relations Order stated in part:

	a.  "The Court further finds that [applicant] is presently named a spouse beneficiary of [FSM]'s Armed Forces SBP (which is deemed to include the Reserve Component SBP) and that [FSM]'s election to provide the SBP benefits to [applicant] should be continued by [applicant]'s being designated as a former spouse beneficiary and that [applicant]'s designation as a former spouse beneficiary should not be modified, amended, withdrawn, reduced, or altered to [applicant]'s detriment by [FSM] during [applicant]'s lifetime, and IT IS SO ORDERED."

	b.  "IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that [FSM] shall immediately designate [applicant] as his former spouse beneficiary under the Armed Forces SBP as his former spouse and that [applicant] shall continue to remain beneficiary as former spouse under that plan."

	c.  "IT IS ORDERED that [FSM] shall immediately obtain, fully complete, sign, and return to the entity required to effect the Armed Forces SBP election all documents, papers, and forms necessary to provide the Armed Forces SBP benefits to [applicant's name] as [FSM]'s former spouse and shall immediately provide [applicant's name] copies of these documents, papers, and forms."

	d.  "IT IS ORDERED that [FSM] shall not during [applicant]'s lifetime modify, amend, withdraw, or in any other manner alter the election to name [applicant] as a former beneficiary of [FSM]'s Armed Forces SBP."

3.  The FSM's service record is void of evidence that indicates he made a voluntary election or the applicant made a deemed election to change his SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse coverage within 1 year of their divorce.

4.  The FSM married T____ D. on 16 September 2009.

5.  At the completion of 20 years of service, the FSM retired from active service on 31 October 2009.

6.  On 3 November 2009, the FSM completed a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) and elected SBP coverage for spouse only, full gross pay.  The FSM's spouse is listed as T____ D.

7.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving family members.  Elections are made by category, not by name.

8.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.

9.  Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members.

10.  Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still serving on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

11.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(b)(3), incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse.  Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within 1 year after the date of the decree of divorce.  The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.

12.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within 1 year of the date of the court order or filing involved.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions regarding being misinformed about her pending survivor benefits are acknowledged.  However, the evidence of record does not indicate an error or injustice exists in this case.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant and the FSM were divorced on 8 March 2007.

3.  The court ordered that the FSM should designate the applicant, his former spouse, as beneficiary under the SBP and continue to remain his beneficiary as former spouse under the plan.  However, there is no evidence which indicates the FSM or the applicant notified the Defense Finance and Accounting Service or any other appropriate agency of the conditions of the divorce related to SBP coverage within 1 year of their divorce as required by law.  Although he was not yet eligible to make an SBP election when they divorced, had the appropriate agency been notified in a timely manner, the matter would have remained pending until he retired.  

4.  The applicant retired on 31 October 2009 and he elected to participate in the SBP for spouse coverage.  He was married to his current spouse, T____ D., at that time.

5.  Since the lawful beneficiary of the FSM's SBP is his current spouse, and in the absence of a timely request for a deemed election, the ABCMR cannot take away the current spouse's right to the SBP without her knowing and voluntary consent or due process of law which may involve legal action in a court of competent jurisdiction with the FSM's current spouse joined as a party.  Therefore, the applicant's request cannot be granted at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ___X_____  __X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008753



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140008753



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000971

    Original file (20090000971.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Civil Action Order, dated 31 October 2008, states in part, that the FSM represented on 16 May 2008 that he was not currently married and that he could not name the applicant as the beneficiary on his SBP as previously ordered by the Court due to the fact that it was not done within one year of the divorce. The Civil Action Order furthers states, in part, that based upon the evidence in this matter and after a careful and thorough review of the same, the Court hereby orders, adjudges,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009572

    Original file (20080009572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 19 March 1993, the FSM and his spouse, the applicant were divorced. He did not do so, and although the applicant provided copies of letters that show she did make a request for a deemed election of the SBP for former spouse coverage within one year of the divorce as required by law, there is no indication that these letters were received by DFAS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015665C070206

    Original file (20050015665C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The DFAS letter provided by the applicant pertained to her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014731C070206

    Original file (20050014731C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    She included in the divorce decree that she would like the SBP as part of her divorce settlement for herself and her two children. The applicant submitted a written request, dated 25 May 2005, for a deemed election to DFAS to change the SBP coverage from spouse and children to former spouse and children coverage. Considering the applicant submitted a deemed election for former spouse and children coverage in a timely manner and provided documentation as evidence of her timely deemed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013171

    Original file (20100013171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her former spouse's records to show she made a deemed election under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) within 1 year of their divorce. d. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage without the member's agreement in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. f. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018165

    Original file (20120018165.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests the FSM’s record be corrected to show the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary for his SBP benefits. There are no SBP election documents in the record; however, his retirement approval memorandum indicates he elected full spouse coverage and the applicant was his spouse at the time. Although the applicant and FSM did not comply with the requirement to submit a former spouse election and the applicant failed to request a deemed election within 1 year of their divorce...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005569

    Original file (20120005569.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel argues that: * T____ was the beneficiary of the SBP when the FSM retired through the date of the divorce; she was never deleted as the SBP beneficiary * The FSM made contact with DFAS and OPM to change the SBP designation to former spouse coverage; OPM complied but DFAS did not * The FSM believed no additional documentation was needed and as such, continued to pay monthly premiums until he was paid up * The Board has previously granted relief, directly or indirectly, in multiple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002749C070206

    Original file (20050002749C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: Counsel states the FSM and the applicant were married for 25 years and divorced on 27 February 2001. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The separation agreement awarded the applicant 50 percent of the FSM's retired pay and stated she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001032

    Original file (20100001032.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected former spouse Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage in conjunction with their divorce. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003451

    Original file (20130003451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a retired and deceased former service member (FSM), requests payment of the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity based on his death. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The applicant and the FSM were divorced in 1995.