| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | Member | |
| Mr. William D. Powers | Member |
2. The applicant requests on behalf of her mother, in effect, that the records of her deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage.
3. The applicant states that the divorce decree awarded her mother the SBP. The FSM was in contempt of court when he withdrew from the SBP just 7 days after the decree was signed.
4. The FSM's military records show that he had prior service in the U. S. Air Force. He and the applicant’s mother married on 22 September 1956. He enlisted in the Regular Army in 1960. He retired on 1 April 1976. At that time he enrolled in the SBP for spouse coverage, reduced base amount ($300.00).
5. On 23 September 1988, the FSM and the applicant’s mother divorced. The divorce decree states in pertinent part “The Court further finds that, as a just and right division of the estate of the parties having due regard for the rights of the parties, such Survivor Benefit Package election should be continued and maintained in full force and effect and that same should not be altered or withdrawn by ___ during his lifetime. IT IS THEREFORE FURTHER ORDERED AND DECREED that ___ shall not, during his lifetime, revoke, modify, amend, withdraw, or in any other form alter the election to provide the Survivor Benefit Package… is permanently ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from revoking, withdrawing, amending, or in any other way modifying or altering such benefit package election.”
6. On or about 1 October 1988, the FSM provided the U. S. Army Finance and Accounting Center his divorce decree. The Finance and Accounting Center processed that portion of the decree dividing his retired pay and stopped his SBP coverage.
7. On 21 December 2000, the FSM died. He apparently did not remarry and no beneficiary is currently receiving the SBP.
8. Public Law 92-245, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.
9. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses for retiring members. This law also decreed that state courts could treat military retired pay as community property in divorce cases if they so chose. It established procedures by which a former spouse could receive all or a portion of that court settlement as a direct payment from the service finance center.
10. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).
11. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
12. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP. It permits a person who, incident to a proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse to make such an election. Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce. If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made. Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board concludes that there is no Government error in this case. It appears that the FSM may have failed to request, in writing as required by law, a change to his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage due to the strict wording of the court decree, i. e., that he would not, during his lifetime, revoke, modify, amend, withdraw, or in any other form alter the election to provide the SBP to the applicant’s mother. When he then submitted the divorce decree to the U. S. Army Finance and Accounting Center to start the division of his retired pay, that Center automatically stopped his SBP.
2. The law provides that if a person fails or refuses to make such an election for former spouse coverage, the former spouse concerned may make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made. There is no evidence that the applicant’s mother did so. The law permitting a former spouse to do so had only been in effect for two years and the applicant’s mother or her counsel may not have aware that she could have done so.
3. The Board concludes that as a matter of equity the applicant’s mother should be granted the SBP annuity. It was Congress’s intent in establishing the SBP to provide for those spouses who supported the military member for the majority of his or her military career. The applicant’s mother was married to the FSM for the majority of his military career. However, SBP premiums were not paid from 1988 until the FSM’s death in 2000. It would be appropriate to require that all due SBP premiums be paid before starting the SBP annuity.
4. In view of the foregoing, the FSM’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM requested, in writing, that his SBP coverage be changed to former spouse coverage, reduced base amount ($300.00) on 1 October 1988.
2. That the applicant be advised that the Defense Finance and Accounting Service will be instructed to collect any SBP costs due.
3. That the applicant’s mother be paid an annuity based upon the FSM’s changed SBP election retroactive to the date of his death.
BOARD VOTE:
__jns___ __mvt___ __wdp___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
John N. Slone
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001053722 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20010724 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.04 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003999
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. Therefore, it would...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004313C070205
There is no evidence of record that indicates the applicant submitted a written request for a deemed election for former spouse coverage. The FSM retired on 1 May 1986 and elected SBP spouse and dependent children coverage. It stated that “[FSM] shall not, during his lifetime, provide, modify, amend, withdraw, or in any other manner alter the election to name [applicant] beneficiary of the Armed Services Survivor Benefit Plan.” However, there is no evidence of record that shows the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016751
If the member fails to make such an election, the law also permits the former spouse concerned to request that a former spouse SBP coverage election be deemed to have been made, if the request is made within one year of the date of a court order of divorce. The evidence of record indicates that the FSM failed to elect SBP coverage for his former spouse at the time of his retirement on the DD Form 2656. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008753
The applicant, the former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse based on their divorce decree. The FSM's service record is void of evidence that indicates he made a voluntary election or the applicant made a deemed election to change his SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse coverage within 1 year of their divorce. Title 10, U.S. Code, section...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010612
The applicant requests that the records of her former spouse, a retired former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he timely filed a request with the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse in accordance with the Final Decree of Divorce granted by the 27th District Court of Lampasas County, Texas. Her request was denied on 28 March 1996 because it was not timely filed within one year of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058441C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 3 September 1986, the FSM and the applicant were divorced. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104787C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states that her mother (the FSM's former spouse) was married to the FSM for most of his military career. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016712
The applicant, as the former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse based on their divorce decree. His service record is void of evidence which indicates the FSM or the applicant made a deemed election to change his SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse coverage within 1 year of the divorce. Given a court of competent jurisdiction awarded SBP coverage to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057250C070420
Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses for retiring members. Since the divorce decree stated that the FSM abandoned the applicant’s mother, the FSM presumably intended to provide spouse coverage for his new spouse rather than former spouse coverage for the applicant’s mother. His new spouse pre-deceased him and he presumably terminated his SBP coverage in March 1999 because of her death.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091004C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election made by her deceased ex-spouse, a former service member (FSM), be changed to former spouse coverage. The record shows that neither the FSM nor the applicant took any action to request a change to the FSM’s SBP election to former spouse coverage within a year of the divorce decree being issued, as is required by law. The record shows that the FSM failed to make a former spouse coverage SBP election as was...