Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090326C070212
Original file (2003090326C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 6 November 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003090326

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deyon D. Battle Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Stanley Kelley Chairperson
Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Member
Ms. Mae M. Bullock Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Certificate of Release or Discharge (DD Form 214) be corrected to show that he was assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of RE-1 instead of RE-3.

APPLICANT STATES: That his RE code was waived to allow him to enlist in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) and his DD Form 214 should be amended accordingly.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 16 April 1992, he enlisted in the Army for 5 years in the pay grade of E-2. He successfully completed his training as a fighting vehicle infantryman. He was promoted to the pay grade of E-3 on 16 January 1993 and to the pay grade of
E-4 on 27 January 1994.

He was honorably discharged with severance pay on 7 March 1997, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, chapter 4-24b, as a result of a disability (lower back pain). He had completed 4 years, 10 months and 22 days of total active service and he was furnished an RE-3 code.

Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.

Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214. It states, in pertinent part, a DD Form 214 will be issued to members for periods on active duty totaling 90 days or more. It further states that the information contained on the DD Form 214 will apply only to the period of service covered by the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The actions by the Army in this case were proper, and there is no doubt to be resolved in favor of the applicant.

2. The applicant was separated and assigned a reentry code in accordance with applicable regulation.


3. The Board has noted the applicant’s contention that his RE code was waived to allow him to enlist in the USAR. However, his DD Form 214 appropriately reflects the RE code that he was assigned for that period of service. Therefore, his DD Form 214 is correct as currently reflected.

4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__mb ___ __sk ____ __rjw ___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003090326
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/11/06
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 1021 100.0000/ADMINISTRATIVE MATTER
2. 4 100.0300/RE CODE CHANGE
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078234C070215

    Original file (2002078234C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He states that he had a RE code of 1 prior to his discharge and was told that the RE code issued to him would not allow him to enlist in the United States Army Reserve (USAR). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011558C070208

    Original file (20040011558C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his discharge from the RA shows the separation authority was chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, and the reason for his separation was completion of required active service. There is no evidence in the applicant's record which shows that he applied for a waiver of his RE Code to enter the U.S. Air Force and/or that his request was denied. Those individuals can best advise a prior service member as to the needs of the U.S. Air Force and are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057296C070420

    Original file (2001057296C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his reentry code (RE) code 3 be changed to RE 1. The applicant’s Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214), effective 16 March 1996, shows the narrative reason for separation as completion of required active service with a separation code of LBK, and a RE code 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057884C070420

    Original file (2001057884C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show his separation in pay grade E-4 and his reentry eligibility code as RE1. On 8 September 1996, he was honorably separated, in pay grade E-1, under Army Regulation 635-200, based on the completion of his term of service. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was separated in pay grade E-1 and assigned RE Code 3, based on his NJP of 10 July 1996.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085488C070212

    Original file (2003085488C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The applicant has submitted no evidence that these codes are in error or should be changed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069350C070402

    Original file (2002069350C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 April 1979, the applicant’s commander initiated separation action on the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-31, Expeditious Discharge Program. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. At the time, the pertinent paragraph in chapter 5 provided that members who completed at least 6 months but less than 36 months of continuous active service on their first enlistment and who demonstrated that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007037C070205

    Original file (20060007037C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    This document also shows, in pertinent part, that the separation authority was Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), Chapter 4, and the reason for his separation was completion of required active service. It identifies the SPD Code of LBK as the appropriate code to assign RA enlisted Soldiers who are separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 4, based upon completion of required active service. Those individuals can best advise a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080932C070215

    Original file (2002080932C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 30 December 1996, the applicant's commander requested that an elimination packet be prepared on the applicant based on his wrongful use of cocaine and numerous counseling statements. The applicant was discharged on 26 February 2002.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090183C070212

    Original file (2003090183C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board also carefully considered the supporting doctor’s letter provided by the applicant that indicates that he is now physically able to perform active duty service. In view of the circumstances in this case, the Board finds the RE-3 code was appropriately assigned based on the authority and reason for the applicant’s discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065404C070421

    Original file (2001065404C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s refusal to extend his enlistment placed him in a nonpromotable status, barred him from reenlisting, and denied him eligibility for separation pay. His DD Form 214 indicates he had 5 years, 9 months and 19 days of active service, and assigned the separation code of LBK, and the reentry code of 3. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for...