Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078234C070215
Original file (2002078234C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 3 December 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002078234

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. William Blakely Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Mr. James E. Anderholm Member
Ms. Charmane Collins Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his reentry (RE) code be upgraded to RE-1.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he reviewed his Military Personnel Record Jacket (MPRJ) on numerous occasions and found nothing derogatory. He states that upon his return from the Gulf War, he discovered a bar to reenlistment was on file in his MPRJ. He states that he had a RE code of 1 prior to his discharge and was told that the RE code issued to him would not allow him to enlist in the United States Army Reserve (USAR). He states that he served honorably in both the Navy and the Army, and received good conduct and achievement awards. After all this honorable service, he was being told that he had to leave the Army, that he was being denied severance pay, and that he could not reenlist, which made him angry, bitter, and devastated. In support of his application he submits a copy of his separation document
(DD Form 214).

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

On 26 November 1985, after completing 4 years of prior honorable service in the Navy, he initially enlisted in the Army for 3 years. On 9 November 1988, he reenlisted for an additional 3 years. His record shows that the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was specialist/E-4 and that he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: Army Service Ribbon; Southwest Asia Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars; Army Good Conduct Medal; and National Defense Service Medal.

The applicant’s MPRJ contained a Declination of Continued Service Statement (DCSS), which confirmed that the applicant chose not to extend or reenlist to meet a service remaining requirement in order to comply with overseas permanent change of station (PCS) assignment orders. He executed the DCSS after being counseled on its effects, and acknowledging that among other things, he understood that signing the DCSS would place him in a non-promotable status and result in his being assigned an RE-3A code, which prohibited him from reenlisting without an approved waiver from Department of the Army (DA).

The DD Form 214 issued to and authenticated by the applicant with his signature on the date of his separation, 8 November 1991, confirms that he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of expiration of term of service (ETS). This document also shows that he was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JBK and an
RE code of 3A.


Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the United States Army Reserve (USAR). Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes. It shows, in pertinent part, that RE-3A applied to persons not qualified for continued active Army service, who declined to meet additional service through reenlistment or extension, but who were fully qualified for enlistment in the USAR.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The evidence of record confirms that on the date of his discharge, the applicant was ineligible for reenlistment in the RA as a result of signing a DCSS. By regulation, this mandated he be assigned an RE-3A code upon his discharge at ETS.

2. In view of these circumstances, the RE code of RE-3A assigned the applicant at discharge was and still is appropriate. However, this does not mean the applicant is not eligible for further service. At the time of his discharge, he was fully eligible to enter the USAR, and he was eligible to reenter the RA 93 days after his separation with an approved waiver from DA. The applicant is advised that if he is still interested in further service, he should contact a local recruiter to ascertain his eligibility for enlistment in the USAR or reenlistment in the RA under current enlistment standards.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__ FNE _ __JEA___ ___CC__ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002078234
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2002/12/03
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 100.0300
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072438C070403

    Original file (2002072438C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This records review revealed no evidence in regard to the applicant’s SPD code assignment upon his separation in 1989. The evidence of record indicates that at the completion of his first period of service on 24 January 1989, the applicant was assigned a SPD code of JBK and a corresponding RE code of RE-3A. However, based on a review of the applicant’s record for his period of active duty service that ended on 16 June 1991, the Board finds no indication that the applicant was barred from,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607302C070209

    Original file (9607302C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the assignment of an RE code of RE-3A was appropriate. He was informed at the time he signed the DCSS that he would be assigned an RE code of RE-3A. There is no evidence that the applicant attempted to comply with his service remaining requirement during the 87 days he was retained on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511111C070209

    Original file (9511111C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code of RE-3B be corrected to the RE code he should have been assigned. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. He was informed at the time he signed the DCSS that he would be assigned an RE code of RE-3A.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001251

    Original file (20090001251.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Table 2-3 of the SPD code regulation identifies the SPD codes applicable to enlisted personnel and lists the SPD code of MBK as being applicable to members separated under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of completion of required service and indicates note 6 is applicable. However, by regulation, an RE-3 is the proper code to assign members separated at the completion of their required active service when a DCSS is in force. The evidence of record confirms...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010267

    Original file (20090010267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It stipulates that the SPD code of MBK will be assigned to Soldiers separated under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of completion of required service, who have a DCSS in force and are REFRAD and transferred to the RC. However, by regulation, an RE-3 is the proper code to assign members REFRAD at the completion of their required active service when a DCSS is in force.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056093C070420

    Original file (2001056093C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. SPD code JBK is the appropriate code for members being discharged, under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of ETS who are ineligible for, barred from, or are otherwise denied reenlistment who are separated on completion of enlistment. The evidence of record confirms that on the date of his discharge, the applicant was ineligible for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014171C080407

    Original file (20070014171C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jeffrey C. Redmann | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code MBK is the appropriate code to assign to RA Soldiers who are eligible to reenlist with a Declination of Continued Service Statement (DCSS) in force who are REFRAD on completion of enlistment and transferred to the USAR to complete their military service obligation and are separated under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009755

    Original file (20120009755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He adds he made it clear to the retention office that if he could not get his choice in duty locations he would reenlist for the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). The SPD/RE Code Cross-Reference Table indicates the SPD code of MBK will have an RE code of 3 assigned when a Soldier's record contains a DCSS. As such, there is no error or injustice in either the SPD or RE codes he was assigned at the time of his release from the RA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003546

    Original file (20150003546 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty this period on 1 February 2005; was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 25 February 2011 in accordance with AR 635-200, chapter 4, based on completion of required active service; and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve) to complete his Reserve obligation. Records show the applicant signed a DCSS; therefore, he was ineligible for continued active service. The evidence of record shows RE code "4"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020942

    Original file (20110020942.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SPD code of "MBK" is the correct code for Soldiers REFRAD for completion of required active service under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200. This code is used for RA Soldiers eligible to reenlist or with a DCSS who are REFRAD on completion of enlistment and transferred to the Reserve components to complete military service obligation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item...