Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089775C070403
Original file (2003089775C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


                  IN THE CASE OF:
        


                  BOARD DATE: 16 October 2003
                  DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003089775

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Deyon D. Battle Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. Hubert O. Fry Member
Ms. Mae M. Bullock Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and the Retired Service Member Family Protection Plan (RSFPP).

APPLICANT STATES: That at the time of her husband’s death, she was not listed as his surviving spouse. She states that the FSM failed to correct his military record to reflect their marriage and therefore, he did not enroll the family into the SBP. She further states that she should be afforded the opportunity to pay past premiums, which would allow her dependents and herself to receive a monthly annuity.

In support of her application, she submits a copy of the FSM’s Certificate of Release or Discharge (DD Form 214); a copy of his Certificate of Death; a copy a court certification of her marriage to the FSM; and copy of her Marriage Certificate, which reflects the FSM as her husband.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM’s military records show:

On 21 May 1959, he enlisted in the Air Force for 4 years, in the pay grade of E-1. At the time of his enlistment, the FSM indicated that his marital status was single. He successfully completed his training as a crypto repairman. He had completed 4 years of total active service when he was honorably discharged on 20 May 1963, at the expiration of his term of service. On 14 April 1964, the FSM enlisted in the Army for 3 years in the pay grade of E-2. He remained in the Army through a series of continuous reenlistments.

He completed his required service for retirement and on 30 November 1980 he was transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Retired). He had completed 20 years, 7 months and 17 days of total active honorable service.

Prior to his retirement, the FSM completed a Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel (DA Form 4240) that is contained in his Official Military Personnel File. Part IV of DA Form 4240 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election) indicates that at the time that he retired, he was unmarried and that he had no children. The DA Form 4240 shows that he declined enrollment in the SBP.

The FSM married on 24 January 1981 and he died on 31 July 2002.

Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, repealed the Retired Serviceman’s Family Protection Plan and established the SBP. The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. It declared a 12-month Open Season for those members who retired prior to enactment of the law.
Public Law 93-155, enacted 16 November 1973, extended that Open Season from 12 to 18 months (21 September 1972 through 20 March 1974).

Public Law 97-35, enacted 12 August 1981, established the second Open Season from 1 October 1981 through 30 September 1982. It required that enrollees live two years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity. Extensive publicity of this Open Season was given in Army Echoes, the Army bulletin published and mailed to retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army.

Public Law 101-189, enacted 29 November 1989, established an Open Season to be conducted from 1 October 1991 (but deferred to 1 April 1992) through 30 September 1992. It required that enrollees live two years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity. Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes.

Public Law 101-510, enacted 5 November 1990, delayed the start of the third Open Season to 1 April 1992 through 31 March 1993.

Public Law 105-261, enacted 17 October 1998, established an Open Season to be conducted from 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000. It required that enrollees live two years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity. Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. While empathetic with the applicant’s situation, the Board concludes that it would not be appropriate to correct the FSM’s records to reflect that he elected to participate in a program which he clearly declined.

2. The FSM married for the first time prior to the second SBP Open Season. Extensive publicity and information about the SBP was provided to all previously retired service members and he had several opportunities to enroll in the SBP. Extensive publicity for the two subsequent Open Seasons of 1992 through 1993, and 1999 through 2000 was given in Army Echoes, which is sent to all retirees.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.


4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__mb ___ ___hof __ ___ao___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003089775
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/10/16
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 346 137.0000/SBP
2. 350 137.0400/CHANGE IN ELECTION
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000812

    Original file (20090000812.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that she be designated as the annuitant of the FSM's Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The FSM's record contains a copy of a DA Form 1041 (Election of Options Under Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan) signed and witnessed on 4 March 1965, which shows in item 11 that he elected not to receive reduced retired pay in order to provide an annuity for his dependants. Extensive publicity was given in Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013792

    Original file (20070013792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Echoes also warned that for a retiree with a high number of years since first being able to enroll a beneficiary in the SBP and whose retired pay was fairly high, the enrollment premium alone could exceed $50,000. The available evidence shows that the FSM was eligible to enroll in the SBP for spouse coverage when it was established in 1972 or during any one of several subsequent Open Seasons. Even if the FSM had attempted to enroll in the SBP during the 1 October 2005 through 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077690C070215

    Original file (2002077690C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). An election to provide an annuity of one-half, one-quarter, or one-eighth of the member's retired pay had to be made before the end of the 18th year of service. Records at DFAS-CL show that he failed to enroll in the SBP when it was established in 1972 and there is no evidence to show he attempted to enroll during a subsequent Open...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028587

    Original file (20100028587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM’s military service record shows he reenlisted in the U.S. Army on 23 August 1978. Evidence of record shows the FSM elected to decline enrollment in the SBP program upon retirement and a letter of notification was sent to her since she was unavailable for counseling. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077015C070215

    Original file (2002077015C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The FSM had an opportunity to enroll in the RCSBP when he received his 20-year letter.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013175

    Original file (20060013175.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060013175 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Although the FSM retired in 1970, there is no evidence to show he enrolled in the SBP when it was established in 1972. Since the records at DFAS show the FSM did not make an SBP election prior...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068044C070402

    Original file (2002068044C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time they signed the Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel, DA Form 4240, they were not counseled about anything they were signing nor told deductions were to be taken out (if SBP were elected). The FSM retired on 1 September 1982. That the applicant be paid an annuity based upon the FSM’s election to participate in the SBP retroactive to 24 September 2001, the date of his death.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005326

    Original file (20070005326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the FSM's records be corrected to show that he completed an RCSBP (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan) election certificate and that she be granted a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60, to provide an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055925C070420

    Original file (2001055925C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Had the enrollment form used been accepted, the applicant would have been eligible for the SBP had the FSM survived for only three more weeks. The Board cannot change the date of the FSM’s death; however, the Board concludes that it would be appropriate to correct his records to show that he enrolled in the SBP on 12 June 1979. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM completed the DA Form 4240 on 12 June 1979 and enrolled in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070342C070402

    Original file (2002070342C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The DA Form 4240 indicates the applicant was not available for counseling but was informed by letter dated 29 December 1975 of the FSM’s decision. Retiring members and spouses were to be informed of the SBP options and effects.