Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077015C070215
Original file (2002077015C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 19 September 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002077015

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. JoAnn H. Langston Chairperson
Ms. Melinda M. Darby Member
Mr. Ronald E. Blakely Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).

APPLICANT STATES: That she was never informed of this program prior to the FSM's retirement from the Army National Guard nor before his death in July 1993. Lack of retirement counseling hindered their knowledge of this program; therefore, she was never given the opportunity to elect an option. Supporting evidence is as listed on the 12 July 2002 letter from the Ohio Army National Guard accompanying her application.

COUNSEL CONTENDS: Counsel makes no additional comment.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The FSM's military records are not available. Information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.

The FSM was born on 27 August 1941. He and the applicant married on 6 March 1967.

The FSM's notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 16 April 1980. The letter says a Survivor Benefit Plan Summary was attached. He apparently did not complete a Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883, at that time. He apparently was discharged from the Army National Guard in 1989 in the rank of Chief Warrant Officer Three.

The FSM died on 6 July 1993 at age 51 of an acute myocardial infarction as a consequence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from which he had suffered for 10 years.

Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. A member must make the election within 90 days of receiving the notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60 or else wait until he/she applies for retired pay and elect to participate in the standard SBP.

Public Law 97-35, enacted 12 August 1981, established the second Open Season from 1 October 1981 through 30 September 1982. It required that enrollees live two years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity.

Public Law 101-189, enacted 29 November 1989, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 October 1991 through 30 September 1992. It required that enrollees live two years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity. Extensive publicity of this Open Season was given in Army Echoes, the Army bulletin published and mailed to retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army. (Army Echoes was mailed to gray area retirees (those eligible for retired pay but not yet age 60) beginning sometime in the 1980s.) Public Law 101-510, enacted 5 November 1990, delayed the start of the third Open Season to 1 April 1992 through 31 March 1993.

Public Law 106-398, enacted 30 October 2000, required written spousal consent for a Reserve service member to be able to delay making an RCSBP election until age 60. The law is applicable to cases where 20-year letters were made after 1 January 2001.

DISCUSSION
: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The FSM had an opportunity to enroll in the RCSBP when he received his 20-year letter. It appears that he did not take that opportunity. While the RCSBP is meant to provide protection to a member's family, at the time the decision to enroll or not was the member's, not the spouse's. The law which required spousal concurrence with a decision to delay making an SBP election until reaching age 60 was not enacted until 30 October 2000.

2. The FSM had a second opportunity to enroll in the RCSBP during the 1981 through 1982 Open Season. There is no evidence to show that he attempted to enroll during that period. It appears he was still active in the Army National Guard at this time and should have been aware of the Open Season.

3. The FSM had a third opportunity to enroll in the RCSBP during the 1992 through 1993 Open Season. By this time, Army Echoes was being mailed to gray area retirees. It contained extensive publicity on this Open Season. Although this Open Season required that enrollees live two years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity, had the FSM attempted to enroll during this period it would have been evidence of his intent to do so. However, there is no evidence that he attempted to enroll at that time.

4. Regrettably, in view of the foregoing there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__JHL__ __MMD__ ___REB__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002077015
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2002/09/19
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 137.04
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077517C070215

    Original file (2002077517C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 105-261, enacted 17 October 1998, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 March 1999 – 29 February 2000. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015598

    Original file (20130015598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656-9 (SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election), dated 25 January 2006, shows he elected spouse-only coverage. He provided a letter from DFAS, dated 12 July 2013, which states: * their records indicate he elected RCSBP child coverage on his DD Form 1883 on 7 February 1988 * at that time he was not married * on his original DD Form 2656 he elected SBP for his spouse and he indicated his marriage occurred on 19 May 1989 * there is a 1-year window of eligibility * notification, along...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013359

    Original file (20090013359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The evidence available to the Board indicates the FSM annotated on his October 1993 DD Form 1883 that he was not married at the time he elected to provide an annuity to his dependent son. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, that the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101899C070208

    Original file (2004101899C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since he had elected children only coverage, he had to elect either option B or option C. If he were married, he and his spouse had to sign the reverse of the DD Form 1883. The available evidence of record shows that the FSM was not married to the applicant in May 1989; therefore, he could not have elected spouse coverage at that time. The available evidence of record shows that the FSM and the applicant married in October 1989; therefore, by the time the March 1992 letter was sent out...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006415

    Original file (20080006415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 Memorandum, dated 17 November 1988. c. DD Form 1883, dated 7 January 1989. d. Certificate of Marriage, dated 2 August 2000. e. Miscellaneous letters and Designation of Beneficiary Forms from the New York State Police and Fire Retirement System. This letter notified the FSM that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. Even if the FSM had been able to enroll the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011056

    Original file (20080011056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of her earlier petition to the Board requesting the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage. However, the evidence of record gives no indication that the FSM ever submitted an SBP election form to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005326

    Original file (20070005326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the FSM's records be corrected to show that he completed an RCSBP (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan) election certificate and that she be granted a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60, to provide an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004957

    Original file (20130004957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's records to show he enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) with spouse coverage. She applied for the survivor annuity and was told that a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Certificate) was not on file in the FSM's military records. The applicant contends that the records of her deceased husband should be corrected to show he enrolled in the RCSBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020185

    Original file (20100020185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show he elected spouse Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. c. in Section XI (SBP Spouse Concurrence) (Required when member is married and elects children only coverage or does not elect full spouse coverage, or declines coverage), item 30 (I hereby concur with the SBP election made by my spouse. This form shows the FSM indicated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000812

    Original file (20090000812.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that she be designated as the annuitant of the FSM's Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The FSM's record contains a copy of a DA Form 1041 (Election of Options Under Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan) signed and witnessed on 4 March 1965, which shows in item 11 that he elected not to receive reduced retired pay in order to provide an annuity for his dependants. Extensive publicity was given in Army...