Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089348C070403
Original file (2003089348C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF
        

         BOARD DATE: November 25, 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003089348

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor Chairperson
Ms. Lana E. McGlynn Member
Ms. Yolanda Maldonado Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).



THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Purple Heart.

2. The applicant states that while serving in Vietnam as an infantryman, his bunker suffered a direct mortar hit and due to the concussion blast, he bled from both ears. He contends that he is entitled to awards of the Purple Heart and the CIB.

3. The applicant provides a copy of an order awarding him the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for meritorious service, a copy of his report of separation (DD Form 214), and a copy of his separation orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on 1 February 1971. The application submitted in this case is dated 3 February 2003.

2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. The applicant's records, though somewhat incomplete, show that he enlisted in Sacramento, California, on 2 February 1968, for a period of 3 years.

4. He was transferred to Vietnam on 2 August 1969 and was assigned to II Corps Advisory Team 38, for duty as a light weapons infantryman. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 and served there until 28 July 1970, when he was transferred to Fort Hood, Texas.

5. On 1 February 1971, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) in the pay grade of E-2, due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS). He had served 3 years of total active service and was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.

6. The orders provided by the applicant show that he was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service during the period of August 1969 to July 1970 by Military Assistance Command – Vietnam (MAC-V) orders 3764, dated 13 July 1970. This award was never entered on his DD Form 214.

7. In 1987, the Army Reserve Personnel Center authorized the issuance of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation; however, it was never added to his DD Form 214.

8. A review of the available records as well as the Vietnam Casualty Listing failed to show any evidence that the applicant was wounded, treated for any such wounds or injuries, or that he was reported as a casualty.

9. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, established the criteria for award of the CIB. It states, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for the CIB, an individual must be an infantryman with an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS) and must perform duty as an infantryman, as a member of an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size, during any period in which that unit was engaged in ground combat. Battle participation credit alone is not sufficient.

10. That regulation also provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound/injury sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a result of hostile action, that the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that he performed the duties of an infantryman assigned to an infantry unit that was engaged in ground combat while in Vietnam. Accordingly, there is no basis to award him the CIB.

2. The applicant has also failed to show that he sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action in Vietnam or that he was treated for any such wounds or injuries. Accordingly, there is no basis to award him the Purple Heart at this time.

3. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 1 February 1971; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 1 February 1974. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.
4. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, administrative correction of the applicant's records will be accomplished by the Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) Support Division, St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined by the Board in paragraph 2 of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

YM__ __LEM___ __RO____ DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested, and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.

2. The Board also determined that administrative error in the records of the individual should be corrected. Therefore, the Board requests that the ARBA Support Division-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show awards of the ARCOM and the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation.




                  Raymond V. O’Connor
                  CHAIRPERSON






INDEX

CASE ID AR2003089348
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/11/25
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1971/02/01
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.107.0020 66/ARCOM
2.107.0111 157/CIB
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066176C070421

    Original file (2001066176C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant’s records fails to show any indication that the applicant was ever wounded/injured or ever treated for any such wounds/injuries while on active duty. The available evidence of record found in this case fails to indicate that the applicant was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action, that he was treated by medical personnel, and that such treatment was made a matter of official record. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080587C070215

    Original file (2002080587C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he believes that he should have been awarded the Purple Heart for a wound he received in Vietnam when a piece of shrapnel hit him in the inner left thigh. The Board finds that there is sufficient evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was in fact wounded in Vietnam and should have been awarded the Purple Heart for his wound. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061140C070421

    Original file (2001061140C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. He had served 1 year, 9 months and 29 days of total active service and was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. Although the applicant has provided evidence to show that he was treated for cellulitis of the right hand, he contends that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068947C070402

    Original file (2002068947C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Although his records contain no evidence that he was awarded the Purple Heart for his wound, the certificate provided by the applicant shows that he was awarded the Purple Heart by the hospital commander on 23 January 1969, for wounds received in action on 13 December 1968. After carefully examining the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086688C070212

    Original file (2003086688C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, his records do show that he was awarded a temporary physical profile for temporary duty restrictions due to multiple fragment wounds – (L) Hand and Wrist: contusion of left median nerve. Although the applicant's medical records are not available for the Board to review, the Board finds it reasonable to presume that he was in fact wounded in action against the enemy on 19 June 1970, the date he was evacuated. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072407C070403

    Original file (2002072407C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There is sufficient evidence to show that the applicant was wounded on 31 October 1969, while serving as an infantryman in Vietnam, that he was treated by medical personnel and that he was awarded the Purple Heart for his wounds. The evidence of record also shows that he was awarded the ARCOM with “V” device...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068800C070402

    Original file (2002068800C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart and that he be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). He further states that when he departed Vietnam he was told that he was being recommended for awards of the BSM and CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100203C070208

    Original file (2004100203C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 19 February 1971. The evidence of record as well as the evidence submitted by the applicant with his application fails to show that the applicant was wounded in action against the enemy on or about 10 July 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the period of 20 February 1969 to 19 February 1971, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086676C070212

    Original file (2003086676C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) for service in Vietnam during the period the applicant was assigned. The Military Police Report contained in his records shows that the applicant and another soldier went into a bar and when told that the bar was closed, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089268C070403

    Original file (2003089268C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant is requesting that the error of failing to award him the PH he earned during his tenure on active duty, which ended on 26 September 1968, be corrected. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that show he was ever wounded or injured in...