Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
Mr. Luther L. Santiful | Chairperson | ||
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member | ||
Mr. Ronald J. Weaver | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his report of separation (DD Form 214) dated 7 August 1972 be corrected to reflect all of his awards and that he be awarded a second award of the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 does not reflect his awards of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, his Purple Heart, his Vietnamese Airborne Wings and his award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star (RVNGC w/Bronze Star). He further states that he was in a bar in Saigon on 5 September 1971 when he returned from the restroom and saw another American being attacked by seven or eight communists. He goes on to state that he went to the aid of the other service member and one of the communists pulled out a pistol and shot him in the right arm. As a result he has been paralyzed in the right arm. He continues by stating that he should have received the Purple Heart for saving another American from being killed by communists.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted on 9 October 1968 for a period of 3 years. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 11 September 1969. He was assigned to Company N, 173rd Airborne Brigade for duty as a light weapons infantryman.
5. On 13 November 1969, he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device for heroism in connection with ground operations against a hostile force. The citation indicates that he was wounded during the engagement. He was awarded a Purple Heart for multiple fragmentation wounds to the back and was also awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). He was evacuated to the United States for treatment and was reassigned to Fort Bragg, North Carolina on 7 January 1970.
6. On 9 July 1970, he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. He reenlisted on 10 July 1970, for a period of 6 years, assignment to Vietnam and a reenlistment bonus. He was reassigned to Vietnam on 3 September 1970 and was assigned to the Airborne Advisory Detachment, Military Assistance Command – Vietnam (MACV).
7. On 5 December 1970 he was awarded the Vietnamese Parachute Badge – Novice Class and on 11 March 1971, he was awarded the RVNGC w/ Bronze Star.
8. On 5 September 1971, while in a bar in Saigon, the applicant was shot in the arm during an altercation with local nationals. A Military Police Investigation conducted at the time indicates that the applicant and another soldier entered a bar in Saigon shortly after midnight and ordered drinks. They were informed at the time that the bar was closed. The applicant and the other soldier again ordered drinks and were again told that the bar was closed. At this time the other soldier went behind the bar and poured two drinks. When he attempted to take the drinks he was struck by three unknown Vietnamese and was knocked to the floor. He stated that while the scuffled ensued, he heard two or three gunshots and then the applicant hollered that he was hit. They exited the bar, flagged down a car and went to the 3rd Field Hospital.
9. The applicant was evacuated to a hospital in Okinawa and then to Fort Hood, Texas, where he was subsequently retired, by reason of temporary disability (70%) on 7 August 1972. On 29 February 1976, he was removed from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and was transferred to the Permanent Disability Retired List.
10. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on 7 August 1972 indicates that he was awarded the Parachutist Badge – Novice Level, two overseas bars, the Good Conduct Medal and that he participated in three campaigns.
11. A review of his records also shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with three bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM), the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL), and the Parachutist Badge.
12. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound/injury sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a result of hostile action, that the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
13. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) for service in Vietnam during the period the applicant was assigned.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. While the evidence of record establishes that the applicant was in fact wounded in Vietnam, there is no evidence to substantiate his claim that he was wounded in action against the enemy. Although the applicant claims that the individuals involved were enemies, there is no evidence to suggest that such was the case.
2. The Military Police Report contained in his records shows that the applicant and another soldier went into a bar and when told that the bar was closed, the soldier who accompanied the applicant decided to help himself. It appears that his actions to take what he wanted precipitated the ensuing altercation and resulted in the applicant being shot. While his intervention may very well have saved the other soldier's life, injuries that occur in bar fights are not the type of injuries that the Purple Heart is intended to recognize. Accordingly, the Board finds no basis to award him a second award of the Purple Heart.
3. However, the evidence of record does show that he is entitled to awards of the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and the RVNCAHM-FC Unit Citation.
4. Additionally, he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, the Purple Heart, the Parachutist Badge, the RVNGC w/Bronze Star, the VSM with three bronze service stars, the Vietnamese Parachutist Badge – Novice Level (depicted as Parachute Badge Novice Level on his DD Form 214), the NDSM, and the RVNCM that should be reflected on his DD Form 214.
5. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and RVNCAHM-FC and by showing on his DD Form 214 dated 7 August 1972, that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, the Purple Heart, the CIB, the Parachutist Badge, Vietnamese Parachutist Badge – Novice Class, the NDSM, and the VSM with three bronze service stars.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
___ls____ ___rw___ __clg ___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_____Luther L. Santiful_____
CHAIRPERSON
CASE ID | AR2003086676 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | YYYYMMDD |
DATE BOARDED | 2003/08/05 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | GRANT PARTIAL |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
ISSUES 1. 189 | 110.0000/corr 214 |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091247C070212
Although the evidence does not clearly establish the date the applicant was promoted to the pay grade of E-5, documents contained in his records that are dated as early as 16 August 1969 and all the way through the date of his REFRAD, indicate his rank as that of a sergeant. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 28 November 1967 through 13 August 1970. As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003984C070206
Allen L. Raub | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Although there are no orders present in the applicant’s records showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart, it is reasonable to presume, given all of the medical documentation surrounding the shrapnel wounds to his left hand, that he was in fact awarded the Purple Heart while in the 3rd Field Hospital and that the orders never caught up with his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019355
The applicant states that he was wounded in action in Cambodia in June 1970 and received the Purple Heart; however, it was not reflected on his records at the time of his release from active duty. However, there is no evidence in the available records to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding of the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star Medal with one oak leaf cluster,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083623C070212
A review of the available records fails to show any indication that the applicant was wounded or that he was recommended for award of the Purple Heart. The applicant participated in six campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. Although the standard evidentiary documentation required for awarding the Purple Heart is not present in this case, the Board finds that the statements submitted by three former members of the applicant's unit at the time, of which one was the first sergeant at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091209C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Although the available records do not contain evidence that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for his 19 June 1967 wound in Vietnam, the evidence of record clearly establishes his entitlement to that award. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087226C070212
The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart; however, an administrative oversight at the time of separation resulted in one award being omitted from his DD Form 214. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 21 March 1967 through 11 January 1970. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014533
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. A review of his official records shows no record of the applicant being awarded the Purple Heart. The applicants contention that he was awarded two awards of the Purple Heart has been noted; however, the applicant has not provided orders to show two awards of the Purple Heart and the evidence of record contains evidence of only one incident of his being wounded.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020485
The applicant requests that his deceased father be awarded two Silver Stars and two additional awards of the Bronze Star Medal; however, there are no orders or other evidence in his Official Military Personnel File authorizing these awards. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that during his service with the Heavy Mortar Company of the 180th Infantry Regiment in Korea, this unit was awarded the Distinguished Unit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000307C070205
John Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant sustained shrapnel wounds in Vietnam and that he was treated by medical personnel at the time; however, it appears that an administrative oversight resulted in his not being awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080587C070215
The applicant states that he believes that he should have been awarded the Purple Heart for a wound he received in Vietnam when a piece of shrapnel hit him in the inner left thigh. The Board finds that there is sufficient evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was in fact wounded in Vietnam and should have been awarded the Purple Heart for his wound. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the...